Due Process
Perspective on Due Process
Looking into the different perspectives on justice I would have to say I agree with the due process perspective. After reading different types of justice on how criminals and noncriminals should be treated I believe this process is the fairest at handling all types of cases. The reason I agree with this process is that the main idea is all about fairness and it allows those that do not have means or resources to defend themselves are given access to receive qualified help. This process prevents any person from being discriminated against due to their race or religion.
I would like to think that if a person is innocent the truth will come out on it’s own.
Unfortunately this is a very unrealistic fact but thanks to due process more often than not the truth does come out through scrutinized investigation and litigation.
Even though this process cannot prove innocence or guilt it is a better way to gather evidence and facts for each person circumstance. However during this process some people who are innocent do fall through the cracks of the justice system. But, this is not the end of due process. Each person has the right to an appeal. Yet it is a fact that innocent people are sent to prison and even death we can still continue the fight to always persue fair justice in due process. On the flip of this I feel the worst part of our justice system is that guilty people can be set free and unless there is more time to delegate to prosecuting criminals some will also slip through the cracks.
Generally speaking the due process list is exhaustive. But without this right a person wouldn’t get a fair and public trial. They wouldn’t have the right to be present and hear his or her accuser. They wouldn’t receive an impartial or non-biased jury. In other words each person could be sent to prison just because there assumed guilty and if you’re in another country these laws don’t seem to exist at all. Thank goodness we are a
Looking into the different perspectives on justice I would have to say I agree with the due process perspective. After reading different types of justice on how criminals and noncriminals should be treated I believe this process is the fairest at handling all types of cases. The reason I agree with this process is that the main idea is all about fairness and it allows those that do not have means or resources to defend themselves are given access to receive qualified help. This process prevents any person from being discriminated against due to their race or religion.
I would like to think that if a person is innocent the truth will come out on it’s own.
Unfortunately this is a very unrealistic fact but thanks to due process more often than not the truth does come out through scrutinized investigation and litigation.
Even though this process cannot prove innocence or guilt it is a better way to gather evidence and facts for each person circumstance. However during this process some people who are innocent do fall through the cracks of the justice system. But, this is not the end of due process. Each person has the right to an appeal. Yet it is a fact that innocent people are sent to prison and even death we can still continue the fight to always persue fair justice in due process. On the flip of this I feel the worst part of our justice system is that guilty people can be set free and unless there is more time to delegate to prosecuting criminals some will also slip through the cracks.
Generally speaking the due process list is exhaustive. But without this right a person wouldn’t get a fair and public trial. They wouldn’t have the right to be present and hear his or her accuser. They wouldn’t receive an impartial or non-biased jury. In other words each person could be sent to prison just because there assumed guilty and if you’re in another country these laws don’t seem to exist at all. Thank goodness we are a