Preview

Consequentialism Research Paper

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
466 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Consequentialism Research Paper
Consequentialism
By Jeremy Ciolli
University of the People

For this paper I choose the topic of consequentialism. Consequentialism is the subject of this study that I felt I most related to and was true for me. In this paper I will explain what it is, why I relate to it, and why I feel it is incomplete. Consequentialism is the subject in morality of weighing the consequences of your actions by the outcomes it will effect. You tally up the consequences and if they are more right or good than not, then it is moral (Fieser, section c). Per James Fieser in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, this subject breaks down into three main sub-headings:
• “Ethical Egoism: an action is morally right if the consequences of that action are more favorable than unfavorable only to the agent performing the action.
• Ethical Altruism: an action is morally right if the consequences of that action are more favorable than unfavorable to everyone except the agent.
• Utilitarianism: an action is morally right if the consequences of that action are more favorable than unfavorable to everyone.”
In this paper, I would like to spend the most time on utilitarianism. I find that this most closely relates to my own thoughts. From utilitarianism is where we have heard the phrase “greatest good for the greatest number,” which came from James Bentham,
…show more content…
We are considering everyone and everything. As humans, we are not super-separate from everything else. We don’t live in a box. Thus, we must consider how our actions affect others. This is why I relate mostly to this concept and feel is deserves the greatest weight. What I feel it doesn’t explain is a method for tallying the consequences and what departments of life we should tally. “Greatest good for the greatest number,” but what does this include? Does it just include other people? Should it include plants and animals? The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Acct3563 Individual Report

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Consequentialism conveys that the rightness and wrongness of an action depend entirely on its consequence and outcome. Stakeholders that may be vulnerable to our company’s income smoothing practices include:…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Consequentialists believe that whether an act is right or wrong depends only on the overall consequence of that act, where punishment should serve to promote good, contributing to crime prevention or societal welfare.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism theories hold that the moral worth of actions or practices is determined by their consequences. An action or practice is right if it leads to the best possible balance of good consequences over bad consequences for all affected parties. (Arnold, pp 17)…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Act consequentialism is a form of consequentialism that influences peoples’ decisions by ranking consequences of an act from best to worst, ultimately cultivating the moral rightness of one's decision. An act consequentialist would apply policy 1, as their focus is narrowed on the (alleged) set of consequences: a reduction…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eth 316 Week One Essay

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The utilitarianism theory of ethics focuses on weighing options for actions and the choice made depends on the course of action that has the best consequences for the individual. This approach gives little consideration to the morals as long as the outcome benefits one’s self, even at the expense of some individuals. Morality issues receive consideration if the action taken is a moral one. For example, a person may not personally believe in war, but a soldier will serve when called because he or she believes in serving his or her country (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2011).…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Act-consequentialists believe that the moral rightness of an act depends entirely on whether the act’s consequences are at least as good as that of any alternative act.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While I do believe that consequentialism is the right way to set the standards of whether or not an action is moral, there is a major concern about it that sets it back. The set back that I am talking about is, sometimes the consequence that we want does not happen at all, and it turns into something that is completely opposite. Basically a mismatch happens in this situation. This is a problem in our ability to judge an action or person correctly. It is wrong to claim that a person’s action was immoral or even moral because the consequences turned out unexpectedly, but if we were to set our moral standards based on the idea of consequentialism this is what could happen.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Consequentialist theory is if the consequences are good, the action is right, if they are bad, the action is wrong and it base on the outcome of the action it is maximise happiness and minimise pain and it will depend of the consequences of the action it will get the greatest number even if the action is immoral but it can get a greatest number of happiness.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Consequentialism is the belief that the right action is the action that results in the best consequences. A morally right action is one that produces a good outcome or result, and the consequences of an action or rule generally outweigh all other considerations. A consequentialist would say “do whatever has the best consequences.” An example of consequentialism in medical ethics is euthanasia.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Williams’ main critique of consequentialism is that it is too demanding. Moreover, Williams thinks that consequentialism is self-defeating, since its “teleological maximizing structure actually destroys a primary source of value in rational human life” (Powerpoint). This is because in consequentialism, we care only about maximizing the good and minimizing the bad, and not about how this is accomplished. And because of this, argues Williams, consequentialism destroys personal integrity, which plays a fundamental role in human happiness. Furthermore, since integrity plays a fundamental role in human happiness, and given the intrinsic conflict between consequentialism and personal integrity, it follows that consequentialism destroys the very thing…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Rule Utilitarian Model

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages

    These moral agents consist of any autonomous person, and excludes inanimate objects and animals. In this approach every person, or every moral agent, is regarded equally and is considered a basic requirement for justice. This differs from the Utilitarian approach because protecting individuals has priority over maximizing the welfare of the majority. The “Respect for Persons” model prioritizes people, and does not allow an action if people are to be killed, deceived, denied their freedom, or otherwise violated simply to bring about a greater total amount of utility. The first approach to this model is the golden rule approach. This approach relies on the concepts of universalizability and reversibility. Universalizability is grounded in the idea that if we think we are acting in a morally acceptable fashion, then we should find it morally acceptable for others to perform similar actions in similar circumstances. Reversibility applies universalizability and is the definition of the golden rule, treating others as one would want to be treated. Under the golden rule approach, a person is expected to make decisions that other people are likely to also make, if placed in a similar situation. Next, in the self-defeating approach, universalizability is applied to ask, if everyone else did what I am doing, would this undermine my ability to do the same thing? And if…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Im Stupid

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. Punishment of a criminal causes pain, a consequentialist can hold that a world with both the crime and the punishment is better than a world with the crime but not the punishment, perhaps because the former contains more justice. Similarly, a world might seem better when people do not get pleasures that they do not deserve.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Is Consequentialism

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Consequentialism is a hypothesis of regulating morals. It holds that a demonstration is just good or moral in the event that it results in a decent conclusion. This is rather than deontology, which shows profound quality depends on obligation; goodness morals, which holds that ethical quality depends on a decent character; and moral relativism, which declares ethical quality depends on whatever you need it to be founded on.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question to explore consequentialism, an approach to morality which, as the name suggests, judges the rightness or wrongness of an action based solely on its outcomes.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    business in context

    • 790 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Understandings: Utilitarianism support that the right action is one that produces the most utility and minimizing the negatives, and the utility that produced by the action is not only for the person performing the action but also for all person involved in the action.…

    • 790 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays