Preview

Difference Between Deontology And Consequentialism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
433 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Difference Between Deontology And Consequentialism
In this section we will look at deontology and consequentialism
A Consequentialist theory is if the consequences are good, the action is right, if they are bad, the action is wrong and it base on the outcome of the action it is maximise happiness and minimise pain and it will depend of the consequences of the action it will get the greatest number even if the action is immoral but it can get a greatest number of happiness.

Go back to AWB scandal in this case nothing forces them to do that they can choose to not take that action. Example there is a theft breaks into your house because he thinks no one home but unfortunately there is your wife and your son in the house. They saw his face and he have to kill two of them. And you just arrived

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moral Reasoning Quiz Paper

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages

    | |[pic] |[pic]B)[pic|Virtue ethics is a moral theory that focuses mainly on one's intentions. |…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apol 104 Quiz 6

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    | These theories specifically focus on the results/end of an act to determine the morality of that act.Answer…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Utilitarianism or the greatest happiness principle, is mainly characterized by happiness and consequentialism. The measure of good and evil is balanced between individual 's happiness and the happiness of the community. (Sommers & Sommers, 2013) If you treat others how you wish to be treated, you are acting in the greater good for the most amounts of people, and in doing so, you are acting with morals. To act selfishly, you are acting morally wrong. This theory relies on producing the greatest amount of happiness. (Sommers & Sommers, 2013)…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    These theories specifically focus on the results/end of an act to determine the morality of that act.…

    • 628 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Consequentialists believe that whether an act is right or wrong depends only on the overall consequence of that act, where punishment should serve to promote good, contributing to crime prevention or societal welfare.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Deontology: A nonconsequentialist ethical theory that claims an act is to be evaluated in terms ofits accordance with a specified set of rules. (Mosser, 2013)Virtue Ethics: An ethical theory that focuses on the character of the agent in evaluating moral behavior, in contrast to utilitarianism or deontology; often associated with Aristotle. (Mosser, 2013)Utilitarianism: A consequentialist ethical theory that evaluates moral claims in terms of their outcomes and to the extent these outcomes generate the greatest benefit for the greatest number. (Mosser, 2013)I was at the grocery store checking out in the self checkout lane, and I noticed that A single mom and her 3 kids were having to take out items because she had reached her limit, I noticed…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Act consequentialism is a form of consequentialism that influences peoples’ decisions by ranking consequences of an act from best to worst, ultimately cultivating the moral rightness of one's decision. An act consequentialist would apply policy 1, as their focus is narrowed on the (alleged) set of consequences: a reduction…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Doctrine of Double Effect states that it is a morally relevant difference between those bad consequences we aim and intend to bring about, and those that we do not intend but still foresee as a likely outcome of our actions. Under certain circumstances, it is morally acceptable to risk certain outcomes that would not be acceptable to intend. Though it is always wrong to kill innocents deliberately, this doctrine says, it is sometimes permissible to allow certain actions to occur understanding that some side effects will be negative. Considering that some side effects involve death, we need to consider the question of whether it is ever morally permissible to use people as a means to one 's end. Warren Quinn attempts to present a deontological way of viewing the Doctrine of Double Effect. The configuration of Doctrine of Double Effect prepared by Quinn makes distinctions on moral assessments. In proportion to consequentialist moral theory, the distinction the Doctrine of Double Effect comprises between intended and merely foreseen consequences does not matter for moral evaluation with the exception of factors that are consequential for production of better outcomes.…

    • 2787 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    trolley problem

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I believe the theory which makes most sense is Jeremy Bentham’s theory of the hedonic calculus. However due to many decisions and actions having to be made in a matter of seconds, I can’t see it being practical in everyday life. The process of the hedonic calculus can take a matter of hours let alone minuets, and by following the process step-by step the decision that had to be made may have already passed. In relation to John mills theory of maximum pleasure and minimal pain, I strongly disagree that this is the correct answer for many ethical situations. Everyone’s pleasures are different and individual, for you to make a decision this can become a hindrance as it’s hard to define how to receive the maximum happiness from every individual. Using this theory in just a situation when it’s just your happiness involved however is a simple process, as you will know your preferences and what makes you happy. However when using this theory in a situation with more than one person it becomes a very complicated situation.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Prison Models

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Theory: Classical, belief that humans operate under free will and an offender makes a choice to engage in criminal behavior believing benefits outweigh the costs.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Deontology is an ethical theory whose name is derived from the Greek word “deon,” meaning duty or obligation. Most ethical theories are concerned with what is right or good, and they often attempt to find this by applying a rule or several rules that seem to fit with outcomes that we most commonly find are "good". Deontology is a non-consequentialist moral theory. While consequentialists, such as a utilitarian, believe the end will always justify the means, a deontologist will assert that the rightness of an action lays in the intent. It is the inherent nature of the act alone that determines its ethical standing. Deontology implies that certain actions are…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The hedonist would argue that pleasure is the only intrinsic good in life, that joy and suffering are the only distinguishing marks of things beneficial or harmful to the human being. To the hedonist, life is like the common balance scale with suffering on one side and pleasure on the other. With pleasure being inversely related to suffering, in order to maximize the good of life, the hedonist strives to minimize suffering, thereby maximizing net pleasure (pleasure minus suffering).…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Even though Deontology and Consequentialism can be extremely similar, both contain key factors that make each idea unique and very different. Sometimes, it may appear that both these theories simply arrive at the same conclusion by way of different paths. While this is sometimes true, it is important to understand how these theories differ. Each of these braches of Ethics deals with morals, actions, ethical decisions and judgments. Beyond the surface though, each of these Ethical ideas begin to differ greatly. Deontology is the theory and/or idea that judges the morality of an action based on the action’s adherence to the overall rules. Consequentialism is the theory and/or idea that the morality should be judged on the action’s overall outcome or consequences. Both theories judge morality. However, Deontology judges morality based on the actions themselves, while Consequentialism judges morality based on the end reaction. Out of these two ethical theories I believe Consequentialism to be least likely to be false.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Police Brutality Research

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages

    be punished. Many people are victims and are affected by police brutality. People in authority…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Utilitarianism

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” –John Stuart Mill. Utilitarianism is based on doing what makes a person happier or provides more pleasure to that person and decreasing the things that makes you unhappy. Happiness and the absence of pain are considered the most desirable things to a person. According to utilitarianism, no matter what a person does, if it increases that person happiness, it is perfectly fine, and “wrong” if it decreases their happiness.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays