Preview

Consistency in Dr. Stockmann

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
743 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Consistency in Dr. Stockmann
Consistency in Dr. Tom Stockmann In Arthur Miller’s adaptation of Henrik Ibsen’s play An Enemy of the People, Dr. Stockmann is first introduced as an intelligent doctor and scientist who appears to live in constant high spirits. Miller describes him as “the eternal amateur- a lover of things, of people, of sheer living, a man for whom the days are too short, and the future fabulous with discoverable joys” (Miller, 6). Upon receiving his results from the university regarding the condition of the water, Dr. Stockmann is faced with lies and corruption, which test the consistency of his integrity and conviction. Proving to be a man of value and truth, Dr. Stockmann does not betray his beliefs to maintain the false image of his town nor does he compromise the truth to restore social peace. He remains faithful to the safety and health of his town regardless of the obstacles. Miller immediately mentions Dr. Tom Stockmann’s sense of integrity in his first description of the doctor. He concludes this short description by explaining how “he [Dr. Stockmann] will not compromise for less than God’s own share of the world while they have settled for less than Man’s”(6). Miller purposely includes this concise yet effective observation to emphasize Dr. Stockmann’s self-assured headstrong character. It is then most certainly re-enforced when Peter Stockmann, Tom’s brother and the mayor, confronts Dr. Stockmann the first time concerning the report explaining the poisoned water. Peter Stockmann orders his brother to deny any danger in the condition of the water to prevent economical depression. Dr. Stockmann refuses to condone this lie and explains how his “convictions will change when the water changes, and for no other reason” (32). Even after Peter calls him a traitor to his town and threatens to fire Tom from the institute, Tom still maintains his strength and integrity. He responds with ferocity and anger explaining how he will stick to his truth until the end.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Although Arthur Miller’s play, The Crucible, focuses primarily on other characters, Giles Corey presents an interesting view of how circumstances can force a man to examine his own views and step into becoming a staunch advocate for the truth and a role model for others.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason Miller writes the play is to magnify the foolish actions of modern day society and how it fails to learn from history's mistakes--in this case, how people are found suspicious because of their individualism. The play…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In The Crucible, the author, Arthur Miller, demonstrates many examples of the complexity of “good” and “evil” in his characters. He does this through many characters, seen and unseen. Perhaps the most lucid representations of these two ideas are achieved through the acts of manipulation, anger, hate, and pureness that a few characters consistently provide.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cannery Row Analysis

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Over the years Doc has become prone to throw white lies, becoming somewhat of a master in deception. Maybe with lack of trust or embarrassment Doc lies to cover his identity. While Doc takes a trip to La Jolla he ponders what a Beer milkshake might taste like, and after finally mustering up enough courage to order Doc reassures the waitress by saying, “I’m supposed to drink a beer milk shake. Doctors orders…It’s not so bad when you get used to it,…Ive been drinking it for seventeen years”(102). This is significant not for the drink but for the lies that lead to it. To provide credibility Doc claims that he must drink the beer milkshake. Whats surprising is how casual and real this lie came about, an indication on Doc’s moral health. Without a sense of trust in the world Doc has become accustomed to bending the truth. He bends words to hide his true figure, altering himself for the better. Also seen while Doc explains his cross-country exhibition, instead of telling the truth that he is walking just to walk, Doc decides that it is easier to say it was a “bet”. Of course many people liked him more because of this lie, but really the only thing that matters is how it affected Doc. He is crushed by life and its adversity, pondering if his falsity could ever be true. After so many small and inappropriate lies Doc is brittle in morality, finding it difficult to distinguish fallacy from…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this particular story, the protagonist - Willy Loman - is on the surface elevated no higher than a psychotic liar who often manipulates even those he loves the most. However, when looked upon through a harsher lens, the only thing that truly becomes obvious is that Willy himself is the archetype of a tragic hero. Lying to his family in friends, while in part cowardly, also questions the way in which a family could be defined as successful. Willy’s affair with another woman, while gross and unforgivable, allow others in the story to demonstrate the perseverance of love. In fact, it is throughout the entirety of Death of a Salesman that Arthur Miller uses his characters to question society, and then demonstrate their unwillingness to fall to adversity. Willy Loman, while indeed a pathetic man, falls through no weakness of his own…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many parallels that can be found between Henrik Ibsen’s An Enemy of the People and Steven Spielberg’s Jaws. Both follow respected men who go against authority and majority opinion to save the lives of the people around them. These productions are iconic in their field, but it is not because of their story but because of their message: Tyranny of the Majority and Dangers of Ignorance. In An Enemy of the People there is pollution in the water, in Jaws, Spielberg chooses to poison the water with sharks. Before the realization of the poisons in the water, both of their jobs had been relatively calm and nothing tragic had happened in either towns. In both of these works there is political satire that caused the immediate hatred of both productions, now they are regarded as ingenious pieces…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play, Death of a Salesman by Arthur Miller, Willy Loman suffers a death of an average man. This story comprises of a whole family of unsuccessful men who use backdoors to accomplish a triumph. As the main focus of the play,Willy’s personality traits are gained through involvement with other characters.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miller, Arthur. "Tragedy of the Common Man." The New York Times 27 Feb. 1949. 12…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The crucible essay

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How does Arthur Miller use a specific character to portray how people solve or fail to solve moral problems?…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: "Tragedy and the Common Man by Arthur Miller." Home Page of TheLiteraryLink, Dr. Janice Patten. Web. 02 Dec. 2009. .…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miller constructs the identity of Willy Loman as one that largely comprises of him being “the Salesman”. The entire dialogue in the passage was dedicated to work, although they were placed in a homely setting, showing that it is hard to separate the private self with the public working self.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “The Company Man”, Ellen Goodman narrates the death of her character Phil and the aftermath of the event. As a metaphor for the typical, non-descript “company man” of the 20th century, Goodman conveys her indifferent sentiments for Phil, who worked himself to death, through a variety of rhetorical devices.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is the real hell in Tomorrow, When the War Began; the new world or the descent of Satan’s steps?…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Life of Arthur Miller

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Clark, A. and Hamadey, G. (2000, October 27). A Conversation with Arthur Miller. The Michigan Daily. Retrieved November 07, 2008, from http://www.pub.umich.edu…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within The Crucible and Death of a Salesman, Arthur Miller’s most famous plays, are two important protagonists that accompany a similar role in society. In The Crucible, John Proctor is a highly respected and strong man in society, but his few weaknesses bring him to a screeching halt and to his own death. Willy Loman, the protagonist in Death of a Salesman, is a vital father figure that again accompanies many weaknesses leading to his unhappy death. Both characters have exceptionally similar but also different lives.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays