Preview

Constrast and Comparison of Gandhi, Malcolm X, and Martin Luther King on the Topic of Violence

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1049 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Constrast and Comparison of Gandhi, Malcolm X, and Martin Luther King on the Topic of Violence
Violence/Nonviolence

Violence is an unjust and unwarranted exertion of force or power. It is a tactic to abuse or violate another being. Many people have thought this notion wrong and used nonviolent methods to go against their oppressor and successfully overcome them. Some of these individuals are Gandhi, M.L. King, and Malcolm X.
Mohandas Gandhi was such a pious individual and used only nonviolence (ahimsa) to gain recognition and defeat his usurpers. His first concept was known as the law of love, "the force of nonviolence is infinitely more wonderful and subtle than the material forces of nature, like, for instance, electricity" (Pg. 626, 2nd paragraph on column 2). Gandhi explains that spiritual love runs like electricity. Instead of physically hurting someone, a person can resist and use a nonviolent approach. An individual must be in harmony with his/her mind, body, and speech. His second concept is the law of suffering where an individual should endure great suffering to progress in his nonviolent actions. Gandhi talks about a "pure" suffering and uses Christ as an example, "hence did the sacrifice of Jesus suffice to free a sorrowing world" (Pg. 624, Lines 8-9). The last two concepts of Gandhi intertwine with each other, cycle of violence and means/ends theory. He explains that violence breeds violence and this cycle continues. If two individuals keep using brutal force against each other, the cycle will go on and on until the end when they both go down in defeat. An individual should use good means to get good ends because "the means may be likened to a seed, the end to a tree" (Pg.621, 2nd paragraph of column 1). Martin Luther king had also used nonviolent methods which he extracted from Gandhi. His first concept is Agape, "understanding, creative, redemptive goodwill toward all men" (Pg. 629, last paragraph). An individual should have mutual love for all human beings, if not "like" which is an emotional affection. King's second theory is the



Bibliography: Presbey, M. Gail, Struhl, J. Karsten, & Olsen, E. Richard. (2000). The philosophical Quest: a cross-cultural reader (2nd Edition).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The best to illustrate the courage in terms of the quality of mind or spirit without violence is Mohanads Karmachand Ghandi is often referred to as Mahatma or the "Great Soul", was the pre-eminent political and ideological leader of India during the Indian independence movement. A pioneer of satyagraha, or resistance to tyranny through mass civil disobedience—a philosophy firmly founded upon ahimsa, or total nonviolence, he was quoted as saying: An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.", "There are many causes that I am prepared to die for but no causes that I am prepared to kill for." Ghandi led India to independence and inspired movements for civil rights and freedom across the world. He achieved the independence for his country through the courage of his mind and his spirit without violence (Mohanads, 1949).…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The times Malcolm and Gandhi lived in where during civil revolutions and huge movements in the country's life. They were in different countries but it was all the same. Inspirational men and were really good at bringing a large groups of their people together.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All it takes is one act of courage and act of caring. There is no important thing in life that people can achieve overnight. Gandhi explains that the force is destructive: “Violence like water, when it has an outlet, rushes forward furiously with an overwhelming force.” Violence leads people to more violence and destroys the moral laws of human beings. Violence leads people to commend the murder, injury, and other crimes which are against humanity. It is also the main cause of conflict within families, societies, and whole nations. Therefore, Gandhi’s writing on non- violence is only the path to change the violent into peaceful and progressive human beings.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King was the most influential civil rights speaker all the way up until his assassination. Martin Luther’s main philosophy was non violence. Martin Luther King used the many teachings of Ghandi’s non violent resistance. King used Ghandi’s teachings because out of the many people that he studied no other teaching appealed to him more than what Ghandi taught. To King the most useful and effective way of helping African Americans get peace was to use non violence resistance. Instead of using force to get his points across and end up getting sent back to jail against King decided that he would use his words to express to the whites that blacks were people to and everyone should be treated with equal rights. He settled down in Birmingham, Alabama and put everything that he learned from Ghandi about non violence to great use.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. believed the way to set the oppressed free was through a moral code that strictly prohibited any form of violence. He believed there was three prominent ways to go about responding to oppression; one being acquiescence; when the oppressed do nothing to help themselves and are sentenced to their doom, physical violence or corroding hatred, and nonviolent resistance.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Martin Luther King led his followers, he taught them protest with respect and dignity. Martin Luther King once said, in regard to his nonviolent approach, “Violence, as a way of achieving racial justice, is both impractical and immoral. It is impractical because it is a descending spiral ending in destruction for all. It is immoral because it seeks to humiliate the opponent rather than win his understanding; it seeks to annihilate rather than convert. Violence is immoral because it thrives on hatred rather than love.”(Cassutto, 2008). Martin Luther King grew up in a religious family. He comes from educated parents that taught him to be…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    These differences in the upbringing are largely responsible for the separate approaches in how they responded to the issue of racism. Martin Luther King was to many calm and idealistic. Non-violence and encouragement was key in his philosophy of integration. "King urged blacks to win their rightful place in society by gaining self-respect, high moral standards, hard work and leadership. He also urged blacks to do this in a non-violent way." Christianity, community and the radical pacifist views of Mahatma Gandhi…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    King’s notion of non violence had six key principles. He believed that nonviolence was the sole solution that “cured society’s evil and create a just society.” He was not necessarily against the whites, unlike Malcolm, but rather wanted to unify the population. His first principle was that one can resist evil without resorting to violence. According to King, the passion of a nonviolent protester is equivalent to the passion of a violent protester.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Martin Luther King Jr.’s essay, “The Ways of Meeting Oppression”, King addresses various ways to address and deal with problems such as acquiescence, physical violence, and non-violent resistance. While civil disobedience and non-violent resistance may not have results as quickly as other means to face oppression or generate change, I agree with King. I believe that non-violent approaches are the most effective ways to generate change and should be used whenever possible. “Violence often brings about momentary results… violence never brings permanent peace… It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers” (King 493).…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He was known for using non-violent tactics, the method he learned from the Indian leader Mohandas Gandhi. King believed that using these non-violent methods would help others states to witness the violence toward the black community, and to show the reason why blacks can't succeed the way they want to. For example of one…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Jr Non Violence

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The third way that Martin Luther King Jr. proved that he pushed for non violent change was by saying that it was either nonviolence or nonexistence. According to the excerpts from “I have been to the mountain top”, “It is not longer a choice between violence or nonviolence in this world. It’s nonviolence or nonexistence, that’s where we are today. This quote shows how he pushed for nonviolence, because he doesn’t want any violence because in the end madness would break out, and there would be nothing left.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. King and following activist used nonviolent methods to end segregation in America. He used nonviolent methods such as sit-ins, bus boycott, marching, and…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Final Draft

    • 1567 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Since Dr. Martin Luther King was heavily influenced by Gandhi’s philosophies, many similarities exist between their theories concerning nonviolence. Gandhi claimed that violence rarely achieved lasting results and that, if used, people would become convinced this was the only way to solve their issues 1. King agreed in his own context, saying that if African Americans used violent means as a way of bringing forth social change, they would eventually be misled to believe that there was no alternative to violence 2. Instead, both Gandhi and Dr. King passionately advocated for nonviolence in their respective countries. In his “Letter from Birmingham City Jail,” King stated that “nonviolence seeks to create such a crisis and establish such creative tension that a community that has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue.” 3 He echoed the attitude of Gandhi by rhetorically asking, “Are you able to accept blows without retaliating? Are you able to endure the ordeals of jail?” 4.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King has been known for using peace to help him get equality among all people but especially African-Americans. He was not the type of leader that resorted to violence in order to get the equality that he fought for. King has been known for moving people by the use of his speeches like King’s I Have a Dream and I’ve Been to the Mountaintop speeches. King shows through these speeches that even though he was determined to get equal rights for every African-American, he was only going to stick to subtle, nonviolent ways like court cases, protest, and boycotts. This philosophy is the exact opposite to Malcolm X, another Civil Rights Leader, who thought that African American should not waste their time on protest and boycotts (Document 7). Malcolm, like King, was not in favor of violence but believe that African Americans should by all means use violence to protect themselves when they “attacked by racists” (Document 9). But, Martin Luther King’s philosophy was more beneficial for the African-American community then Malcolm X’s because the effort that he put into his nonviolent philosophy made gaining rights more successful and more meaningful.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Resisting Oppression

    • 298 Words
    • 1 Page

    Resisting Oppression In specific situations, I believe that people can and will use violence to resist oppression. If a group of people are being oppressed because of their race, religion, color, etc. and their lives have been altered significantly or become endangered because of being oppressed. Then, you must either take action(violently or non-violently) or remain in your current situation. When you first try to talk it out or take legal action against the oppressors and nothing works you began to think forcefully. You try to force your way out of the situation, violently. Sometimes the violence is unnecessary, but it can be the only solution.…

    • 298 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays