Preview

Constructive Discharge

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1061 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Constructive Discharge
Memo
To: CEO
From: Elementary Division Manager
Date: 12/07/2012
Re: Constructive Discharge, Employee ID - 4022
Message:
With respect to the case filed by our former employee against the company under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, constructive discharge, I would like to draw your attention towards the legalities of constructive discharge.
Constructive discharge occurs when employees resign because their employer 's behavior has become so intolerable or heinous or made life so difficult that the employee has no choice but to resign (Constructive Discharge). The employee has charged the company with constructive discharge and same if proved can create problems. According to our new work schedule the employee needs to work on his religious holiday which has not been taken well by him. Since the employee is required to work on his religious holiday and same has been mentioned as the sole reason for discontinuing his employment with the company so constructive discharge as a legal concept is valid to the scenario.
It is unlawful if an employer discriminates against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. (Title VII of The Civil Rights Act, 1964). Title VII clearly states that “an employer has a duty to reasonably accommodate its employee’s religious beliefs as long as the accommodation is not an undue hardship.” "Accommodations" include allowing employees to have flexible schedules for religious holidays; however it also says that an employer has the right to refuse accommodation if doing so would pose an unnecessary burden on the employer.
Here, the employee has raised case of constructive discharge after change in the work schedule policy change. All the issue can be sorted out if we offer accommodation to the concerned employee by changing the days on which he is required to work which will take care of his



References: 88 F. 3d 506 - Vitug v. Multistate Tax Commission R, No. 94-3092. (United States Court of Appeals, 7 8, 1996). Constructive Discharge. (n.d.). Retrieved 02 05, 2012, from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructive_dismissal EEOC v. Dresser Rand Co., 04-CV-6300 (U.S. District Court September 2004). Justice Department Settles Religious Discrimination Lawsuit Against Berkeley School District in Illinois. (2011, 10 13). Retrieved 2 5, 2012, from The United States Department of Justice : http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2011/October/11-crt-1362.html Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. (n.d.). Retrieved 2 5, 2012, from U.S. Equal Employment: http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/titlevii.cfm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    (2) if it is determined by the division that the individual has been discharged for misconduct connected with the individual's employment; or…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ms. Granbury can claim illegal discharge through citing breach of an implied contract. The handbook lists a number of grounds on which an employees’ employment may be terminated. It…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Constructive discharge occurs when the employer's conduct effectively forces an employee to resign. Although the employee may say, "I quit," the employment relationship is actually severed involuntarily by the employer's acts, against the employee's will. As a result, a constructive discharge is legally regarded as a firing rather than a resignation. An employee cannot simply "quit and sue," claiming he or she was constructively discharged. The conditions giving rise to the resignation must be sufficiently extraordinary and…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jdt2 Task 1

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Civil Rights Act of 1964 – CRA – title VII – Equal Employment Opportunities – 42 US Code Chapter 21. (2008) Retrieved August 17, 2012, from Find US Law: http://finduslaw.com/civil_rights_act_of_1964_cra_title_vii_equal_employment_opp ortunities_42_us_code_chapter_21 29CFR1605.2. (2006, July 1). Title 29 – Labor. Retrieved August 18, 2012, from GPO.GOV:http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2006/julqtr/29cfr1605.2htm Chrysler Corp. V. Mann, No 76-1196 (United States Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit September 14, 1977). Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hardison, 432 U.S. 63 (1977) Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Elizabeth McDonough v. The Catholic University of America 83 F.3d 455 (US Court of Appeals, DC Circuit 1996)…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rjdt Task-1

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq.…

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    is also propositioned,but considers the workingenvironmentso intolerable that she resigns before any adverse action is taken…

    • 9192 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. Defines constructive discharge as meaning an employer’s discriminatory practices made working conditions so intolerable that any reasonable person would have resigned (EEOC, Prohibited Employment Policies/Practices).…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term constructive discharge is by definition when an employee feels they are forced to resign their job because the employer has made working conditions unbearable (Doyle,2013). In the circumstance presented, the employee felt compelled to resign because the work schedule was changed and would require him to work on his religious holy day. The business changed the production team schedule to accommodate growth and expansion, changing the schedule from 8:00am-5:00pm, Monday thru Friday, to four twelve hour shifts. The employees would rotate four days on and four…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (n.d.). Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Retrieved from United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission: http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/titlevii.cfm…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    JDT2-Task 1

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The following are my findings regarding the constructive discharge from the employee that has left our company after our policy change.…

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In reference to the pending lawsuit against our company, I have done some research and compiled some information that may help us in evaluating the best course of action in dealing with this problem. “Constructive discharge is generally when working conditions are so intolerable as to amount to a firing, despite a lack of a formal termination notice.” ("Constructive discharge law," 2012). the former employee is using this idea for her decision to leave our company as equivalent to being unfairly fired. She alleges the requirement to work on the “Holy Day” put her in positions that left her choice to quit. For her to access constructive discharge a number of different items must hold true.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a federal law that protects individuals from discrimination based on religion. Religious discrimination is treating a person differently because of their religious believes. In this case Elaine Mobley, a member of the nonsectarian Unitarian Universalist Church, can file a legal sue under religious discrimination or the Civil Rights Act of 1964, because she was discriminated by employees and her supervisor. They said that she would be “making efforts repeatedly to “save the soul” of a fellow employee” (Neill, 2014, Web). A proven wrongful dismissal will tend to lead to two main remedies: reinstatement of the dismissed employee, and/or monetary compensation for the wrongfully dismissed. In this case the court should look on how Elaine Mobley told her supervisor that she was feeling harassed by her employees, and shortly after that she was fired. In this case the judge should rule in favor of Elaine Mobley, because of what we have of the case it seems that she was being harassed and told her director of division and did nothing but fire her. The employer did in fact discriminate unlawfully, because you cannot force someone to become one of your same religion. It is especially unlawful to leave messages in her desk stating “How can you speak of God and Reject me? I love you and know all about you” as the book stated (Nkomo, Fottler, McAfee, 7 edition, p. 56).…

    • 2010 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    "Vernonia Sch. Dist. 47J V. Acton (94-590), 515 U.S. 646 (1995)." Legal Information Institute. 23 Oct. 2006 .…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Constructive Discharge

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1964 Congress passed a Civil Rights law that outlawed major forms for discrimination against African Americans and women. One of the major features of this law was Title VII which prohibits discrimination by employers on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of l964 prohibits employers from discriminating against individuals because of their religion in hiring, firing, and other terms and conditions of employment. The basics of Title VII are that employers may not treat employees more or less favorably because of their religion and employees cannot be required to participate or refrain from participating in a religious activity as a condition of employment.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    An employee denied statutory rights merely because remedy of reinstatement is no longer expedient or otherwise may seek the common law remedy of wrongful dismissal. However an employee’s remedies at common law is limited to the requirements of notice which had either been agreed upon by the contracting parties before or at the time of concluding the contract or if there no such agreement, then what is reasonable notice having regard to the length of service, seniority and so on. The remedies of an employee wrongfully dismissed at common law had been concisely noted in the Sibu Steel’s case where the Industrial Course observed…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays