Preview

Rjdt Task-1

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1591 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rjdt Task-1
JDT-2, Task-1,
Kenneth B. Davis
Student #000166146

A. The Concept of Constructive Discharge.

Constructive discharge is legally defined as a given set of working conditions that are so intolerable that a reasonable employee would be compelled to resign even though the employer has not issued a formal termination notice ("Constructive discharge law,").

Given that the employee has resigned as a result of being required to work on a religious holy day, the following Supreme Court case law applies: In Trans World Airlines Inc. v. Hardinson, (1977), the United States Supreme Court ruled that as long as the plaintiff (Hardinson) held legitimate religious beliefs concerning the performance of labor on a religious holy day and providing that the plaintiff had made a documentable effort to bring this conflict to the attention of his employer, the employer was required to accommodate the religious beliefs of the employee. The Court further held that requiring the employee to work on a religious holy day did in fact amount to constructive discharge as the employer had not made any reasonable efforts to accommodate the religious beliefs of the employee.

In the given scenario it appears that the employee in question has resigned as a result of being required to work on a religious holy day and although not stated in the scenario it is assumed that the employee did bring this conflict to the attention of his/her supervisor and that an accommodation reasonable to both employer and employee was not reached, thus resulting in an intolerable work conditions requiring the employee to resign based upon his/her religious beliefs. If the above assumptions prove to be true then the situation would more probably than not amount to constructive discharge under Title VII of the civil rights act and the company may be liable to the employee for resulting damages in addition to fines that may be imposed by the EEOC. A further review by legal counsel is urgently recommended.



References: Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody, 422 U.S. 405 (1975). Ansonia Bd. Of Educ. v. Philbrook, 479 U.S. 60, 68 (1986). Constructive discharge law and legal definition. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://definitions.uslegal.com/c/constructive-discharge/ Guidelines on discrimination because of religion, 29, C.F.R., 14, 1605, (2011). Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq. 45 FR 72612, (Oct. 31, 1980). Trans World Airlines v. Hardison, 432 U.S. 63, 84 (1977).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rjdt Task 2a

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The situation of determining how to handle the recently discovered high lead content in the large whistles order is a difficult one that will in some way affect the company. Three alternatives have been made to allow options for this decision.…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jdt2 Task 1

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages

    | Per your request to investigate and recommend Toy Company’s position regarding Claim #1-2013; this report was generated. The initial research has been finalized and recommendations determined. I will refer to the claim by its number #1-2013 and the claimant as AA23 to keep the confidentiality of the claimant. First this report will provide a summary of the claim and the history associated with it. Second it will discuss the definition of Constructive Discharge and its relevance to this claim. Third it will provide the specific areas under the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Fourth it will offer recommendations and supporting legal references. Fifth it will recommend proactive steps to avoid future legal issues in relationship to the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. And finally any references used in this research will be provided. A. Definition of Constructive DischargeSummary of Claim and history:In January 1, 2013 a new policy was implemented to support exponential company growth. This policy impacted all production employees. The impacted employees were notified of the changes two months in advance of the January 2013 implementation to allow for assimilation and training on the new shifts schedules and there impacts. Production employee schedules were shifted from a Monday through Friday schedule, 8 hour shift to a Monday through Sunday schedule, 12 hour shift, four working days can occur any day of the week. This schedule requires all production employees to work on holy days regardless of religious affiliation as the production now runs seven days a week.Office staff members were not impacted by this policy change.AA23 quit on January 2, 2013 after new policy was in effect.…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tanglewood Case 3

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ms. Riyadh could argue this is a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Ms. Riyadh could also argue that she was promised she would be promoted in 2 years provided she did a good job. I’m sure the company was aware of her religious beliefs was when she started. Ms. Riyadh received outstanding evaluations and outperformed her male counterparts. She has also won three national awards. According to the Glass Ceiling Commission it is recommended that businesses commit to…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Constructive discharge occurs when the employer's conduct effectively forces an employee to resign. Although the employee may say, "I quit," the employment relationship is actually severed involuntarily by the employer's acts, against the employee's will. As a result, a constructive discharge is legally regarded as a firing rather than a resignation. An employee cannot simply "quit and sue," claiming he or she was constructively discharged. The conditions giving rise to the resignation must be sufficiently extraordinary and…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Memo for Task 1

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    References: Barrett, D. (2012, December 29). Christians have no rights to refuse to work on Sundays, says Judge. The Telegraph. [Co.]. p.1 Civil Rights Act (1964). Retrieved from www.ourdocuments.gov on April 23, 2013. Constructive Discharge. Retrieved from www.tislaw.com on April 20, 2013. Digest of EEO Law. Retrieved from www.eeoc.gov on April 20, 2013. Employment Law. Retrieved from www.about.com on April 20, 2013. Mesritz, George D. (Spring 1996; 21,4; ABI/INFORM). Employee Relations Law Journal p.9 Martin Tepper v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General. (6th Circuit Court, 2007). David A. Goldmeier and Terry C. Goldmeier v. Allstate Insurance Company. (6th Circuit Court, 2003). Constructive Discharge. Retrieved from US Legal at www.uslegal.com on April 19, 2013.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 makes it illegal to discriminate against someone on the basis of their race, color, religion, national origin, or sex . This law provides legal recourse for employees to seek Constructive Discharge for discrimination of their legal rights if they believe a change to a policy or procedure has violated their rights (Shaker, n.d.). The law specific to religious beliefs applies to this situation that has occurred within the company.…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term constructive discharge is by definition when an employee feels they are forced to resign their job because the employer has made working conditions unbearable (Doyle,2013). In the circumstance presented, the employee felt compelled to resign because the work schedule was changed and would require him to work on his religious holy day. The business changed the production team schedule to accommodate growth and expansion, changing the schedule from 8:00am-5:00pm, Monday thru Friday, to four twelve hour shifts. The employees would rotate four days on and four…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    B. United Steelworkers of America vs. Weber (1979) Weber worked for kaiser aluminum who was under united steelworkers of merica-set up special training program for minorities-weber wanted to get in but couldn't filed using 1964 Civil Rights Act title 7-ruled in favor of court because making up for past…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    X that we are willing to work with him to find an acceptable solution and to inform him we are aware of the Code of Federal Regulations (Guidelines on discrimination because of religion, 2009). Several accommodations could be discussed if he would come back to work for the organization, such as, voluntary shift substitutions or flexible scheduling. The organization will need to clear with Mr. X that every effort will be made to resolve the situation.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Wgu Human Resources Task 1

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The employee is stating they were discriminated on because of religion because they now have to work on religious holy days due to the new work schedule. According to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, religion is defined as all aspects of religious observance and practice, as well as belief, unless an employer demonstrates that he is unable to reasonably accommodate to an employee’s or prospective employee’s religious observance or practice without undue hardship on the conduct of the employer’s business. ("Title VII," “n.d.”, p. 2). The employee claims that the toy Company did indeed create an intolerable working condition due to the requirement to work on a religious holy…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I feel this may be the key argument in dealing with this issue since there is no record of her complaint and time to adjust adequately to her complaint before she resigned. Her complaint is that the policy requires workers to work 4 days on then off did not allow her to have off the holy day. While the policy on the face does not allow that the employee is off every “holy day” the company has defense in that the work day may not entirely interfere. Additionally, the company does have the defense of company necessity as a strong justification to the policy. Finally, her lack of contacting the supervisor to see if a resolution could be reached undermines her argument of Constructive…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Whether the trial court properly denied the motion to suppress cocaine obtained from Mr. Garza during a traffic stop, which was reasonably delayed through the time of the search, while Mr. Clements called for backup and had probable cause based upon (1) the suspects’ location in a high crime area; (2) the odor of burnt marijuana emanating from that vehicle; and (3) Mr. Garza’s nervousness, sweating, and deferential behavior to a suspected drug dealer.…

    • 3462 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a federal law that protects individuals from discrimination based on religion. Religious discrimination is treating a person differently because of their religious believes. In this case Elaine Mobley, a member of the nonsectarian Unitarian Universalist Church, can file a legal sue under religious discrimination or the Civil Rights Act of 1964, because she was discriminated by employees and her supervisor. They said that she would be “making efforts repeatedly to “save the soul” of a fellow employee” (Neill, 2014, Web). A proven wrongful dismissal will tend to lead to two main remedies: reinstatement of the dismissed employee, and/or monetary compensation for the wrongfully dismissed. In this case the court should look on how Elaine Mobley told her supervisor that she was feeling harassed by her employees, and shortly after that she was fired. In this case the judge should rule in favor of Elaine Mobley, because of what we have of the case it seems that she was being harassed and told her director of division and did nothing but fire her. The employer did in fact discriminate unlawfully, because you cannot force someone to become one of your same religion. It is especially unlawful to leave messages in her desk stating “How can you speak of God and Reject me? I love you and know all about you” as the book stated (Nkomo, Fottler, McAfee, 7 edition, p. 56).…

    • 2010 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constructive Discharge Research The following research will summarize the concept of constructive discharge as it relates to the claim against the company. In addition, information from Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 will be discussed. The details will include areas Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 relevant to the claim. Finally, the document will include three legal references supporting the recommendations related to the research. Defining constructive discharge A general definition of constructive discharge is “when working conditions are so intolerable as to amount to a firing, despite a lack of a formal termination notice” (USLegal, Inc., 2001). With the court cases involved in this area of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the courts have created two tests to determine if the case has evidence of constructive discharge. These tests are the reasonable person test and the specific intent test. Test 1: The reasonable person test The reasonable person test states, “an employee has been constructively discharged if an employer's discriminatory acts result in working conditions so intolerable that a reasonable person in the employee's position would feel compelled to resign” (Finnegan, 1986, p. 563). An example of this test applied in a case is the Young v. Southwestern Savings & Loan Association (1975) where the employer deliberately made an employee's working conditions so intolerable that the employee was forced into an involuntary resignation.…

    • 3899 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The former employee of the toy company was a religious person who quit his work after the new policy on shift work was enforced. S/he considered it to be discriminatory because the policy required employees to work on a religious holy day. The change of the policy affected all employees, however they did not resign. The “holy” day for the former employee was not a “holy” day for all employees because they represented different religious and had different believes. Therefore the former employee does not fit the definition of “reasonable person” and the company should plead “not guilty.” In addition, there is no evidence that the change of the policy was led by malice employer’s…

    • 1703 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays