Preview

RJDT_Task_1_-_Memo_1_-_USA_Toy_Company

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1674 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
RJDT_Task_1_-_Memo_1_-_USA_Toy_Company
USA Toy Company
Memo
To: Company CEO
From: Elementary Division Manager
CC: Company Attorney
Date: 4/14/2012
Re: Companies Response to an Ex-Employee’s Claim of Constructive Discharge and the Federal Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Law
How is Constructive Discharge Relevant to this Situation?
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 makes it illegal to discriminate against someone on the basis of their race, color, religion, national origin, or sex . This law provides legal recourse for employees to seek Constructive Discharge for discrimination of their legal rights if they believe a change to a policy or procedure has violated their rights (Shaker, n.d.). The law specific to religious beliefs applies to this situation that has occurred within the company.
On November 1, 2011, the Human Resource (HR) Department provided training to the each of the division managers regarding a change to the employee work shift schedule to begin on January 1, 2012. This change was a direct result of the company’s increase in growth and production demand. Following the meeting, each division manager scheduled a date and time that week for their employees to receive comparable training from the HR Department. The HR personnel also relayed to the employees that the change in work shift schedule was a necessary response to the company’s increase in growth and production demand. Employees were given the same opportunity as the division managers to ask questions, receive feedback, and allow the employee time to approach their department manager with any concerns as noted in company policy and procedure. Following the meetings, both employees and division managers signed an acknowledgement of the training which was then placed in their personnel file.
The first of this week I was notified by the HR Department that a former employee who resigned on, January 23, 2012, has filed a claim against our company under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 alleging

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Jdt2 Task 1

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages

    References: innegan, S. (2013). Constructive Dishcarge Under Tittl VII and the ADEA. The University of Chicago Law Review, 561-562.Grace Liebermann V. Genesis Health Care - Franklin Woods Center, CCB-11-2770 (District Court of Maryland 2013).Johnson V. Lacaster-Lebabib Intermediate Unit 13, 11-cv-01598 (District Court for the Eastren District of Pennsyvania 2012).Pennsylvania State Police V. Suders, 542 US 129 (Supreme Court 2004).Religious Discrimination. (2013, 03 24). Retrieved from U.S. Equal EMployment Opportunity Commision: http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/religion.cfm…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tanglewood Case 3

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ms. Riyadh believes she is being discriminated against for religious beliefs and gender discrimination. In this Title VII discrimination case Ms. Riyadh will have to establish a Prima Facie Case proving religious and gender or sex discrimination. The company (ABC) will have the burden of proof of proving their failure to promote Ms. Riyadh to a higher position is not related to her religion or her sex. Ms. Riyadh has to prove she was intentionally discriminated against due to said reasons.…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    MU1 CWTI Memo

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mitigate using control technique ie. Establish strong internal controls regarding the requirement to clear and replant and ensure to measure controls.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    JDT2 Task 1

    • 1672 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees from workplace discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex and national origin. When an employer engages in practices that create a hostile work environment for any of these protected groups, making conditions so intolerable that an employee feels compelled to resign, it is known as constructive discharge Former employee Andy Anderson now alleges that our company engaged in religious discrimination when our production schedule changes went into effect at the first of the year. The changes required all production employees to occasionally work on a religious holy day, and Mr. Anderson has submitted a constructive discharge claim with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).…

    • 1672 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ‘ makes it an unlawful employment practice for an employer.. To discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex or national origin” (204). The language of the law makes it clear that discrimination is considered unlawful, regardless if a firm’s stance on the issue or whether it states it does not want its employees to be harassed since under Title VII, firms are accountable for workplace behavior. Furthermore, firms under Title VII have a legal responsibility to monitor their employees’ behavior to ensure discrimination is not occurring in the workplace. Therefore, an employee cannot be “ acting on their own,” because he is a representative of the firm he / she works at and as a result his actions make the firm legally…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The law specifically addresses discrimination in the workplace. The case presented relates specifically to section 703 which states it is unlawful to discriminate against an individuals race, color, religion, sex, or national origin ("Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964",2013). The employee is claiming the company was in violation of this section by scheduling him to work on his religious holy day. Yet, the question remains as to whether the company intentionally violated the employee 's religious rights by changing shifts, or was it in response to business growth and…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jdt2

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mr. Bernard has filed a claim against the company under the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, constructive discharge claiming that he was required to work on religious holy days and was therefore discriminated against based on religious reasons.…

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1) speaks about discrimination on the basis of religious beliefs.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Wgu Human Resources Task 1

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    At the beginning of the year the toy Company instituted a work schedule change to keep up with the growth of production of the company. The schedule change consisted of 12 hour shifts with 4 days of work and 4 days off. This change means that some of the work days would fall on a religious holy day. All of the production employees will immediately begin working this new schedule. Due to this new work schedule, a claim has been filed against the toy Company under the Title Vii of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The employee is alleging that the toy Company’s enforcement of the new schedule policy on shift work is discriminatory because the policy requires the employee to work on their religious holy day. Constructive discharge occurs when working conditions are so intolerable the employee feels forced to resign from their employment. (Glazer, 2009, p. 1). Constructive discharge is part of the Title VII Civil Rights Act of 1964 that prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin and religion. ("Title VII," “n.d.”, p. 4). Religion is the…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The EEOC also presented evidence that Travis was told the inventory supervisor position would not be filled, but the man who was selected to fill the post was told by a human resources employee that he could have the job if he kept it a secret. The EEOC said that Exel eventually required Travis to train the man who was appointed to the post because he had…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil Rights Act of 1964

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VII provides guidance to the definition of discrimination. The Act provides protection for employees from unlawful employment practices. One of these is the discrimination on basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. In this case the employee is being forced to work on their religious holy day. The other case here has to do with singling out a particular job class for change in shift policy. The production team is the only team to change their shift schedule to work on weekends while the office staff maintains their schedule of Monday to Friday employment. Here the employee is not only discriminated on religion but is also segregated by the job classification to change their shift schedule.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a federal law that protects individuals from discrimination based on religion. Religious discrimination is treating a person differently because of their religious believes. In this case Elaine Mobley, a member of the nonsectarian Unitarian Universalist Church, can file a legal sue under religious discrimination or the Civil Rights Act of 1964, because she was discriminated by employees and her supervisor. They said that she would be “making efforts repeatedly to “save the soul” of a fellow employee” (Neill, 2014, Web). A proven wrongful dismissal will tend to lead to two main remedies: reinstatement of the dismissed employee, and/or monetary compensation for the wrongfully dismissed. In this case the court should look on how Elaine Mobley told her supervisor that she was feeling harassed by her employees, and shortly after that she was fired. In this case the judge should rule in favor of Elaine Mobley, because of what we have of the case it seems that she was being harassed and told her director of division and did nothing but fire her. The employer did in fact discriminate unlawfully, because you cannot force someone to become one of your same religion. It is especially unlawful to leave messages in her desk stating “How can you speak of God and Reject me? I love you and know all about you” as the book stated (Nkomo, Fottler, McAfee, 7 edition, p. 56).…

    • 2010 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is unlawful for any employer to discriminate by refusing to hire or discharge any person and or discriminate any person relating to wages, terms and conditions, or privileges of employment due to race, color, creed or national origin. It is unlawful to segregate or classify any employee and deprive them of equal employment opportunities and cause due harm which will affect their status as an employee based on their race, color, creed or national origin. [Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 200e-2(a).]…

    • 2573 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Discussion on the process of selecting decision alternatives for the whistle issue of the toy company, evaluating the advantages, disadvantages, legal, financial and ethical considerations involved in the various alternatives.…

    • 2154 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Toy World, Inc.

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    company produced a wide range of designs, colors, and sizes. Dol1ar sales of a particular…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays