Preview

Constructive Discharge Analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1703 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Constructive Discharge Analysis
Legal and Regulatory Requirements
By
Boriana Helmick
Western Governors University
Human Resources - RJDT Task 1
Jimmy Jewell
January 27, 2013

A. Constructive Discharge Constructive discharge is a legal term that occurs when an employer creates unbearable working conditions for an employee, so s/he has no other option but to resign. Typical conditions are cut in wages, refusal of holiday, changes in duty, verbal abuse, lack of support and demotion. Although constructive discharge is clearly defined as forcing an employee to resign by making the work environment so difficult, unpleasant, or intolerable that a reasonable person in the aggrieved person 's position would feel compelled to resign, proving it is fairly complicated.
…show more content…
Title VII is a section of the Civil Rights Act that applies to employment decisions and mandates that they cannot be based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin. (Gomez-Mejia, Balkin, & Cardy, 2010) Discrimination is present when the employee is treated unfavorably because of their different appearance, believes or background. For example religious discrimination involves treating an employee or a job candidate unfair because of his/her religious believes. “Religion” is very broadly defined in the law to include all religious observances, practices and beliefs. Not only traditional and familiar churches of Christianity, Judaism or Islam can be considered religion, but also a small spiritual or ritual group of people with new and uncommon …show more content…
Company Response According to Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) law constructive discharge is present when the employer is forcing an employee to resign by making the work environment so intolerable that a reasonable person would not be able to stay. As a legal term “reasonable person” is a hypothetical person in society who exercises average care, skill, and judgment in conduct. (Farlex, Inc., 2013) The former employee of the toy company was a religious person who quit his work after the new policy on shift work was enforced. S/he considered it to be discriminatory because the policy required employees to work on a religious holy day. The change of the policy affected all employees, however they did not resign. The “holy” day for the former employee was not a “holy” day for all employees because they represented different religious and had different believes. Therefore the former employee does not fit the definition of “reasonable person” and the company should plead “not guilty.” In addition, there is no evidence that the change of the policy was led by malice employer’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    (2) if it is determined by the division that the individual has been discharged for misconduct connected with the individual's employment; or…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ms. Granbury can claim illegal discharge through citing breach of an implied contract. The handbook lists a number of grounds on which an employees’ employment may be terminated. It…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jdt2 Task 1

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages

    | Per your request to investigate and recommend Toy Company’s position regarding Claim #1-2013; this report was generated. The initial research has been finalized and recommendations determined. I will refer to the claim by its number #1-2013 and the claimant as AA23 to keep the confidentiality of the claimant. First this report will provide a summary of the claim and the history associated with it. Second it will discuss the definition of Constructive Discharge and its relevance to this claim. Third it will provide the specific areas under the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Fourth it will offer recommendations and supporting legal references. Fifth it will recommend proactive steps to avoid future legal issues in relationship to the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. And finally any references used in this research will be provided. A. Definition of Constructive DischargeSummary of Claim and history:In January 1, 2013 a new policy was implemented to support exponential company growth. This policy impacted all production employees. The impacted employees were notified of the changes two months in advance of the January 2013 implementation to allow for assimilation and training on the new shifts schedules and there impacts. Production employee schedules were shifted from a Monday through Friday schedule, 8 hour shift to a Monday through Sunday schedule, 12 hour shift, four working days can occur any day of the week. This schedule requires all production employees to work on holy days regardless of religious affiliation as the production now runs seven days a week.Office staff members were not impacted by this policy change.AA23 quit on January 2, 2013 after new policy was in effect.…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Constructive discharge occurs when the employer's conduct effectively forces an employee to resign. Although the employee may say, "I quit," the employment relationship is actually severed involuntarily by the employer's acts, against the employee's will. As a result, a constructive discharge is legally regarded as a firing rather than a resignation. An employee cannot simply "quit and sue," claiming he or she was constructively discharged. The conditions giving rise to the resignation must be sufficiently extraordinary and…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Studies

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Rules: Boynton Cab Co. v. Neubeck, 237 Wis. 249, 259-60, 296 N.W. 636, 640 (1941) “. . . ‘misconduct’ . . . is limited to conduct evincing such willful or wanton disregard of an employer’s interests as is found in deliberate violations or disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has the right to expect of his employee, or in carelessness or negligence of such degree or recurrence as to manifest equal culpability, wrongful intent or evil design or to show an intentional and substantial disregard of the employer’s interests or of the employee’s duties and obligations to his employer. On the other hand mere inefficiency, unsatisfactory conduct, failure in good performance as the result of inability or incapacity, inadvertencies…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    JDT2 Task 1

    • 1672 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to an article in the University of Chicago Law Review, courts generally apply two tests when deciding if constructive discharge has occurred. The first is the reasonable person test, meaning that the working conditions are so intolerable that a reasonable person would conclude that resigning is the only recourse. The second is the specific intent test. The plaintiff must show that the employer “created those conditions with the specific intent to cause the employee to resign” (Finnegan, 1986). Mr. Anderson’s case is unlikely to pass either test. According to the production manager, no other employees have resigned or come forward with complaints about the new schedule. Also, the new schedule was implemented solely as a response to increased production demand. It was enforced across the board among all production staff. Meeting minutes and administrative emails prior to the scheduling change do not indicate any intent to make Mr. Anderson or any…

    • 1672 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rjdt Task-1

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Constructive discharge is legally defined as a given set of working conditions that are so intolerable that a reasonable employee would be compelled to resign even though the employer has not issued a formal termination notice ("Constructive discharge law,").…

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Memo for Task 1

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A. According to US Legal Constructive Discharge is generally when working conditions are so intolerable to amount to a firing, despite a lack of a formal termination notice. Most of the time unemployment benefits are not payable unless a Constructive Discharge can be proven. However, it can be established by one of the following: evidence of difficult/unpleasant working conditions so bad that a reasonable person would not remain or evidence of poor conduct by the employer or its agent such as sexual harassment, assault or harassment. Before this can be proven the employee should have notified the employer in writing about the condition and allowed the employer 15 days to respond to see if a reasonable agreement can be made. In the referenced scenario Constructive Discharge does not apply because of these factors: the shift change was due to company growth and the entire production department was affected not one single person therefore no misconduct was shown to employee; the employee failed to notify the employer of the intent to cease working due to the shift change and the employer was not given the appropriate amount of time (15 days) to respond to see if an alternative could be reached such as allowing the employee to move to a different department that was not affected by the shift change; to prove a Constructive Discharge claim the plaintiff would need to prove that it violated his/her religious beliefs and that the employer made the working conditions intolerable. The employee in the referenced scenario felt that the employer was purposefully changing the work week to make conditions intolerable but in fact the employer made these changes to accommodate for the increase in growth and to avoid undue hardship on the company made the decision to change regardless of working on holy days. Because the employer…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    fails or refuses to hire an individual, discharges an individual, or discriminates in any other manner against an individual in connection with compensation or the terms, conditions, or privileges of employment; or…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 makes it illegal to discriminate against someone on the basis of their race, color, religion, national origin, or sex . This law provides legal recourse for employees to seek Constructive Discharge for discrimination of their legal rights if they believe a change to a policy or procedure has violated their rights (Shaker, n.d.). The law specific to religious beliefs applies to this situation that has occurred within the company.…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term constructive discharge is by definition when an employee feels they are forced to resign their job because the employer has made working conditions unbearable (Doyle,2013). In the circumstance presented, the employee felt compelled to resign because the work schedule was changed and would require him to work on his religious holy day. The business changed the production team schedule to accommodate growth and expansion, changing the schedule from 8:00am-5:00pm, Monday thru Friday, to four twelve hour shifts. The employees would rotate four days on and four…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Human Resources Task 1 V2

    • 3137 Words
    • 13 Pages

    When litigating a case of this type, courts have developed two different types of tests to help determine when an employee has been constructively discharged. The courts look at…

    • 3137 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A constructive discharge arises when a wage earner maintains the organization forced him/her to step down because working environments were made unbearable. The claim of constructive discharge under the Title VII Civil Rights Act of 1964 by Mr. X, is unjustified. The employee notifying the company that he was upset with the scheduling change in the production area never filed a complaint. Furthermore, Mr. X did not allow the organization the opportunity to respond to the claim. Thus, the organization was not aware the production schedule change created an unbearable working environment.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil Rights Act of 1964

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In constructive discharge an employee resigns when they have been subjected to unlawful discrimination. The employee in this case was employed before the change in policy in shift work. Before the policy change, the production shifts were Monday to Friday. With the new policy the production team works a rotating shift schedule where at times the schedule rotates to work on Saturday and Sunday. The policy then discriminates against this employee because he is required to work on a religious holy day. The other issue at hand is that there are positions with the office staff that continue to work Monday to Friday. The production staff is being singled out to change their shift work when others still maintain the Monday to Friday schedule. This is intolerable to the employee since they do have the right to not be discriminated on basis of religion. Not everyone in the company has had their schedule changed and due to the change the employee left the company right after the change in policy.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a federal law that protects individuals from discrimination based on religion. Religious discrimination is treating a person differently because of their religious believes. In this case Elaine Mobley, a member of the nonsectarian Unitarian Universalist Church, can file a legal sue under religious discrimination or the Civil Rights Act of 1964, because she was discriminated by employees and her supervisor. They said that she would be “making efforts repeatedly to “save the soul” of a fellow employee” (Neill, 2014, Web). A proven wrongful dismissal will tend to lead to two main remedies: reinstatement of the dismissed employee, and/or monetary compensation for the wrongfully dismissed. In this case the court should look on how Elaine Mobley told her supervisor that she was feeling harassed by her employees, and shortly after that she was fired. In this case the judge should rule in favor of Elaine Mobley, because of what we have of the case it seems that she was being harassed and told her director of division and did nothing but fire her. The employer did in fact discriminate unlawfully, because you cannot force someone to become one of your same religion. It is especially unlawful to leave messages in her desk stating “How can you speak of God and Reject me? I love you and know all about you” as the book stated (Nkomo, Fottler, McAfee, 7 edition, p. 56).…

    • 2010 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays