Preview

Contents Lists Available at Sciverse Sciencedirect

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
10277 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Contents Lists Available at Sciverse Sciencedirect
EMEMAR-00307; No of Pages 15
Emerging Markets Review xxx (2012) xxx–xxx

Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect

Emerging Markets Review journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/emr

Corporate governance and investment-cash flow sensitivity: Evidence from emerging markets
Bill Francis a, Iftekhar Hasan b,⁎, Liang Song c, 1, Maya Waisman d, 2 a Lally School of Management, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110, 8th Street, Troy, NY 12180-3590, United States Fordham University and Bank of Finland, 1790 Broadway, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10019, United States c Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Drive Houghton, MI 49931, United States d Fordham University, 1790 Broadway, 13th Floor, New York, NY 10019, United States b a r t i c l e
Available online xxxx JEL classification: G20 G30 G31 G38

i n f o

a b s t r a c t
Controlling for country-level governance, we investigate how firms ' corporate governance influences financing constraints. Using firm-level corporate governance rankings across 14 emerging markets, we find that better corporate governance lowers the dependence of emerging market firms on internally generated cash flows, and reduces financing constraints that would otherwise distort efficient allocation of investment and destroy firm value. Additionally and more importantly, firm-level corporate governance matters more significantly in countries with weaker country-level governance. This suggests substitutability between firm-specific and country-level governance in determining a firm 's investment sensitivity to internal cash flows. © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Corporate governance Emerging markets Investment–cash flow sensitivity

1. Introduction How firms make investment decisions in the face of financing constraints is one of the most fundamental questions in contemporary finance research (Almeida and Campello, 2007). This is the case because financing constraints can distort the efficient allocation of



References: Please cite this article as: Francis, B., et al., Corporate governance and investment-cash flow sensitivity: Evidence from..., Emerging Markets Review (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2012.08.002 B. Francis et al. / Emerging Markets Review xxx (2012) xxx–xxx 15 Almeida, H., Campello, M., 2007. Financial constraints, asset tangibility, and corporate investment. Review of Financial Studies 20, 1429–1460. Almeida, H., Campello, M., Weisbach, M.S., 2004. The cash flow sensitivity of cash. Journal of Finance 59, 1777–1804. Alti, A., 2003. How sensitive is investment to cash flow when financing is frictionless? Journal of Finance 58, 707–722. Bae, K., Goyal, V.K., 2009. Creditor rights, enforcement, and bank loans. Journal of Finance 84, 823–860. Berkowitz, D., Pistor, K., Richard, J., 2003. Economic development, legality, and the transplant effect. European Economic Review 47, 165–195. Brown, J.R., Petersen, B.C., 2009. Why has the investment–cash flow sensitivity declined so sharply? Rising R&D and Equity Market Developments. Journal of Banking and Finance 33, 971–984. Chen, H.F., Chen, S.J., 2012. Investment–cash flow sensitivity cannot be a good measure of financial constraints: evidence from the time series. Journal of Financial Economics 103, 393–410. Chen, K.C.W., Chen, Z.H., Wei, J.K.C., 2009. Legal protection of investors, corporate governance, and the cost of equity capital. Journal of Corporate Finance 15, 273–289. Cho, M.H., 1998. Ownership structure, investment, and the corporate value: an empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 47, 103–121. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Lang, L.H.P., 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 58, 81–112. Degryse, H., De Jong, A., 2006. Investment and internal finance: asymmetric information or managerial discretion? International Journal of Industrial Organization 24, 125–147. Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., 2008. The law and economics of self-dealing. Journal of Financial Economics 88, 430–465. Doidge, C., Karolyi, G.A., Stulz, R.M., 2004. Why are foreign firms listed in the U.S. worth more? Journal of Financial Economics 71, 205–238. Doidge, C., Karolyi, G.A., Stulz, R.M., 2007. Why do countries matter so much for corporate governance? Journal of Financial Economics 86, 1–39. Durnev, A., Kim, E., 2005. To steal or not to steal: firm attributes, legal environment, and valuation. Journal of Finance 60, 1461–1493. Fazzari, S.M., Hubbard, R.G., Petersen, B.C., Blinder, A.S., Poterba, J.M., 1988. Financing constraints and corporate investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1, 141–206. Goergen, M., Renneboog, L., 2001. Investment policy, internal financing and ownership concentration in the UK. Journal of Corporate Finance 7, 257–284. Greenwald, B., Stiglitz, J.E., Weiss, A., 1984. Informational imperfections in the capital market and macroeconomic fluctuations. American Economic Review 74, 194–199. Hadlock, C.J., 1998. Ownership, liquidity, and investment. The RAND Journal of Economics 29, 487–508. Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A., Scharfstein, D., 1991. Corporate structure, liquidity, and investment: evidence from Japanese industrial groups. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 33–60. Hovakimian, G., 2009. Determinants of investment cash flow sensitivity. Financial Management 38, 161–183. Hubbard, R.G., 1998. Capital market imperfections and investment. Journal of Economic Literature 36, 193–225. International Country Risk Guide, 2000. http://www.countrydata.com/datasets/. Jensen, M.C., 1986. Agency cost of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review 76, 323–329. Joh, S.W., 2003. Corporate governance and firm profitability: evidence from Korea before the economic crisis. Journal of Financial Economics 68, 287–322. Kaplan, S., Zingales, L., 1997. Do financing constraints explain why investment is correlated with cash flow? Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 169–215. Kathuria, R., Mueller, D.C., 1995. Investment and cash flow: asymmetric information or managerial discretion. Empirica 22, 211–234. Klapper, L.F., Love, I., 2004. Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets. Journal of Corporate Finance 10, 703–728. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy 106, 1113–1155. Lamont, O., 1997. Cash flow and investment: evidence from internal capital markets. Journal of Finance 52, 83–109. Lins, K.V., Strickland, D., Zenner, M., 2005. Do non-U.S. firms issue equity on U.S. stock exchanges to relax capital constraints? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 40, 109–133. Love, I., 2003. Financial development and financing constraints: international evidence from the structural investment model. Review of Financial Studies 16, 765–791. Mitton, T., 2004. Corporate governance and dividend policy in emerging markets. Emerging Markets Review 5, 409–426. Myers, S.C., Majluf, N.S., 1984. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics 13, 187–221. Nenova, T., 2003. The value of corporate voting rights and control: a cross-country analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 68, 325–351. Schaller, H., 1993. Asymmetric information, liquidity constraints, and Canadian investment. Canadian Journal of Economics 26, 552–574. Scharfstein, D., Stein, J., 2000. The dark side of internal capital markets: divisional rent seeking and inefficient investment. Journal of Finance 55, 2537–2564. Shin, H.H., Park, Y.S., 1999. Financing constraints and internal capital markets: evidence from Korean Chaebols. Journal of Corporate Finance 5, 169–191. Shin, H.H., Stulz, R., 1998. Are internal capital markets efficient? Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, 531–552. Stein, J., 2003. Agency, Information, and Corporate Investment. Handbook of the Economics of Finance. Elsevier, North Holland. Stulz, R., 1990. Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies. Journal of Financial Economics 26, 3–27. Vogt, S., 1994. The cash flow/investment relationship: evidence from U.S. manufacturing firms. Financial Management 23, 3–20. Please cite this article as: Francis, B., et al., Corporate governance and investment-cash flow sensitivity: Evidence from..., Emerging Markets Review (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2012.08.002

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Eagles Electronics Case

    • 3249 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Chava, S. & Michael, R. (2008) How does financing impact investment: the role of debt covenants. Journal of finance, 63, pp. 2085-2121…

    • 3249 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Coke Financial Structure

    • 2217 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Kale, J. R., Noe, T. H., & Ramirez, G. G. (Dec., 1991). The Effect of Business Risk on Corporate Capital Structure: Theory and Evidence. The Journal of Finance , 1693-1715.…

    • 2217 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Different countries have different types of ownership. Capital provided by banks is very significant, as are small family member in Germany, France and Italy which they are also similar in using the Codifies Roman Law as their legal system. In the other hands, in the United States and United Kingdom there are large number of companies that rely on millions of private shareholder for finance, including Malaysia. This difference has the important effect that lead to differences in financial reporting. La Porta et al. (1997) find a statistical connection between common law countries and strong equity markets. In his findings, he notes that common law countries such as United States have stronger legal protection of investor than Roman law countries do.…

    • 573 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ms Emily Mcivor

    • 3372 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The Odd One Out is a definite complex concept that communicates volumes about human relationships. Initially, a variety of the concepts include the odd one out being racially different therefore communicating the stereotype of them being an odd one out. In addition another volume that derives the certain odd one out concept is the fact that there is always someone trying to help the odd one out, identifying the relationships of humans whom overcome fear and highlight sympathy. Finally another factor proving that the odd one out is a complex concept is the idea that the person helping the odd one out has mores and values that influence those around them and slowly society is also changed. These factors are shown in To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee published by William Heinemann in 1960; Strange Fruits sung by Billie Holiday written by Abel Meeropel, and Only Ten written by Allan Ballie.…

    • 3372 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: 1. Adrienn, H. (2014). SUMMARY OF THEORIES IN CAPITAL STRUCTURE DECISIONS. Annals Of The University Of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 23(1), 912-918.…

    • 2752 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Corporate Investment and Financing Decisions The Role of the Financial Manager and the Opportunity Cost of Capital Goals of the Corporation Agency Problems and Corporate Governance…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: 1. Berle, A.A. and Means, G.C. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. The Macmillan Company, New York, NY. 2. Dolmat-Connell, J. (2002). Carrots and Sticks. Forbes, p.42. 3. Jensen, M. (1986). Agency cost of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 4. Jensen, M. (1989). Eclipse of public corporation. Harvard Business Review 5. Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, pp.305-360. 6. Jensen, M. and Ruback, R. (1983). The market for corporate control: The Scientific Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 11, pp. 5-50. 7. Lang, L., Stulz, R. and Walking, R. (1991). A test of the free cash flow hypothesis. Journal of Financial Economics, 27.…

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dittmar, Amy, Jan Mahrt-Smith, and Henri Servaes, 2003, International corporate governance and corporate cash holdings, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 38, 111– 133. Fama, Eugene F., and Kenneth R. French, 1993, Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds, Journal of Financial Economics 33, 3–56. Fama, Eugene F., and Kenneth R. French, 1998, Taxes, financing decisions, and firm value, Journal of Finance 53, 819–843. Faulkender, Michael, 2004, Cash holdings among small businesses, Working paper, Washington University. Faulkender, Michael, and Mitchell A. Petersen, 2006, Does the source of capital affect capital structure? Review of Financial Studies 19, 45–79. Fazzari, Steven M., R. Glenn Hubbard, and Bruce Petersen, 1988, Financing constraints and corporate investment, Brooking Papers on Economic Activity 1, 141–195. Gilchrist, Simon, and Charles Himmelberg, 1995, Evidence on the role of cash f low for investment, Journal of Monetary Economics 36, 541–572. Grinblatt, Mark, and Tobias J. Moskowitz, 2004, Predicting stock price movements from past returns: The role of consistency and tax-loss selling, Journal of Financial Economics 71, 541– 579. Grullon, Gustavo, and Roni Michaely, 2002, Dividends, share repurchases and the substitution hypothesis, Journal of Finance 57, 1649–1684. Hanson, Robert C., 1992, Tender offers and free cash f low: An empirical analysis, The Financial Review 27, 185–209. Harford, Jarrard, 1999, Corporate cash reserves and acquisitions, Journal of Finance 54, 1969– 1997. Hartzell, Jay C., Sheridan Titman, and Garry Twite, 2005, Why do firms hold so much cash? A tax-based explanation, Working paper, University of Texas at Austin. Hennessy, Christopher A., and Toni M. Whited, 2005, Debt dynamics, Journal of Finance 60, 1129– 1165.…

    • 18371 Words
    • 74 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Corporate cash policy has become a topic of signicant interest recently. The investigation of determinants of corporate cash holdings is an important research area contributing to the understanding of how much cash a rm will hold. The added value of this paper is that it gives a comprehensive discussion of which theories underlie corporate cash holdings. Next to that, it investigates rm specic characteristics as well as industry characteristics that can inuence the level of corporate cash holdings based on a dataset of 1078 US rms listed on the NYSE for the period 1990 to 2007. This paper proceeds as follows. We rst examine the theoretical background concerning the determinants of corporate cash holdings. Theories that are discussed are the trade o theory, the pecking order theory and the free cash ow theory. Second, we discuss the research which already have been done concerning the relevant determinants. Investment opportunities, leverage, rm size, cash ows, dividends and industries will be discussed. In the third part, data and methodology will be discussed. Fourth, the…

    • 5716 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    of Continental European countries such as Germany, the term refers to all the stakeholders of a firm while for Anglo-American countries corporate governance focuses on generating a fair return for investors (see Goergen, Manjon and Renneboog, 2005). The corporate governance devices utilized to ensure economic efficiency include among others shareholder monitoring, creditor monitoring, executive remuneration contracts, dividend policy and the regulatory framework of the corporate law regime and the stock exchanges.…

    • 1247 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is why private equity investors are very skeptical while investing in frontier market like Nepal...... This article has spot-on identified issues related to corporate hygiene................…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Corporate governance has emerged as a major policy concern for many developing countries following the financial crisis in Asia, Russia, and Latin America. The collapse of Enron suggests that even the highly industrialized countries such as the U.S. are not immune to the disastrous effects of bad corporate governance. Studies have shown that low corporate governance standards raise the cost of capital, lower the operating performance of industry, and impede the flow of investment. Following the corporate scandals of Enron, WorldCom, and Tyco, more and more countries have embarked on corporate governance reforms to better protect the interests of investors.…

    • 5841 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Governance Problem in Saccos

    • 8371 Words
    • 34 Pages

    Good governance is now accepted as vital to achieving the Millennium Development Goals and as a pre-condition for sustainable economic growth. Ensuring better governance of corporations, financial institutions and markets is increasingly recognized for developing countries despite of the limited number of firms there with widely traded shares. For developing countries, significant benefits can be linked to higher corporate governance standards in the private sector. These include better access to external finance, lower costs of capital and better firm performance (Claessens 2003).…

    • 8371 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The views expressed herein are those of the consultant and do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s…

    • 13424 Words
    • 54 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. Introduction Information asymmetry between managers and outside capital suppliers can affect how firms finance capital investments. A growing body of evidence indicates that better accounting quality can reduce information asymmetry costs and reduce financing constraints. Consistent with this possibility, Biddle and Hilary (2006) document that higher accounting quality reduces the sensitivity of firms’ investment to their internally generated cash flows. Verdi (2006) and Biddle, Hillary, and Verdi (2009) find that accounting quality is positively correlated with investment for firms prone to underinvest and is negatively correlated with investment for firms prone to overinvest. The importance of accounting quality on investment inefficiency may be mitigated when outside capital suppliers have private information or can directly monitor managers. By accessing private information and controlling managerial actions, outside capital suppliers can directly affect a firm’s investments, reducing the importance of accounting quality. Consistent with this idea, Biddle and Hilary (2006) compare the influence of accounting quality on investment efficiency across countries. They find that accounting quality influences investment efficiency in the United States, but not in Japan. They suggest that one potential explanation for this cross-country difference is the mix of debt and equity in the capital structures of U.S. versus Japanese firms. We extend this research by examining how different sources of financing affect the importance of accounting quality on firms’ investment–cash flow sensitivity. Directly testing how different sources of financing influence the…

    • 13401 Words
    • 54 Pages
    Powerful Essays