Known from three fragmentary copies, from the 19th–25th Dynasties (1295-656 B.C.), this text also probably originated earlier and had a long reading history.45 Although the beginning of the text is damaged, there is a reference to Sisene amusing the king “because there was no woman [or wife] there with him”; and the word “love [desire]” is mentioned in the line above.46 A little later we read that Teti, a commoner, saw “the divine person of the King of Upper and Lower Egypt, Neferkare, going out during the night to walk on his own… [Remaining hidden,] Teti said to himself, ‘if this is the case, then it is true what is said about him, that he goes forth during the night.’ … [Then Teti followed the king, who] arrived at the house of the general Sasenet. He threw up a stone and stamped his foot, at which a [ladder] was lowered down for him. He climbed up, and Teti son of Henet waited... When his divine person had done what he wanted to with [the general], he returned to the palace, and Teti son of Henet followed …show more content…
Just like in the bible the author does not frown on the affair. However its clandestine nature show there is something awry going on there. It would not be altogether wrong to conclude that the Kemetian attitude towards homo-eroticism was complex and varied and could be quite similar to our own modern socitey, ranging from the tolerance of woman-boys or transvestites mentioned in the Book of the Dead, whose sexuality was obvious to everyone to more clandestine affairs like the one between Neferkare and the general Sisene. Surprisingly we find no evidence of the more negative extremes where homosexuals are jailed, banned or killed for being different, as is the case