Preview

Contract and Agency Law

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3129 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Contract and Agency Law
BUS201
Contract and Agency Law
Group Based Case Study

Bai Kailin Q0806156
Question 1

A tender is also considered as an offer. Tenders refers to a process by which one can seek prices and terms for a particular project (such as a construction job in this case) to be carried out under a contract. The sealed offers themselves, including company information, a project outline, and a price quote, are known as tenders or bids. Since Beng Huay Construction Pte Ltd submitted the most competitive tender and was awarded the contract, there is acceptance on Beng Huay Construction Pte Ltd. Whether or not BH can revoke their bid and withdraw from the project entirely depend on what was the terms and conditions stated in the contract. For a contract to be valid, there must be an offer initially by one of the parties. In this case here BH could argue that CPL had under-priced part of the job.

It is not possible under these circumstances because the general rule is that an offer can be withdrawn at any time prior to acceptance. However in this case, the offer has already been accepted. Firstly, CPL placed an advertisement for a tender to construct a warehouse cum factory complex somewhere in Boon Lay which is regarded to as an Invitation To Treat. Next, BH submitted the most competitive tender which in this case is considered as the offer. Following which, BH was awarded the contract which in this case is regarded as the acceptance by CPL of the offer by BH, and as a result, a legally binding contract has been formed. As such, it is not possible for BH to revoke their bid and withdraw from the project entirely in this case since the offer had already been accepted.
However since BH will be unable to revoke the bid and withdraw from the project entirely the parties can engage an independent third party mediator to hear their respective views. The mediator can then try to mediate the dispute and lead the parties into an acceptable settlement.

Question 2 – Part A

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    BTT could not back out of the contract under the doctrine of mistake. Under this doctrine there has…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Big Time Toymaker

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This scenario deals with Big Time Toymaker and a contract they were negotiating with Chou, the inventor of a new strategy game that BTT wanted exclusive negotiation rights for a 90-day period. When Chou received an email with the details of what they were going to agree upon, he thought that was the contract and did not proceed in drawing up a contract himself. Months passed and when BTT changed management, they informed Chou that they were not interested in distributing his new strategy game, Strat.…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Several actions on the part of BTT weigh in favour of Chou in terms of the parties’ objective to contract. The exclusive negotiation agreement shows the…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Defense Construction declared that it was just a clarification and accepted the bid. Analysis The appellant used the Ron Engineering, Supra case to conclude that there was a contracted formed between the owner and each of the tenderers. The contract was Contract A. Since there was a formal contract introduced, the breach by Sorochan Enterprises Ltd. for introducing a stipulation for their bid, in the form of an additional charge, and because Defense Construction accepted this non-compliant bid, the Contract A between the other tenderers was broken.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When a procuring agency fails to adhere to the regulations and/or the terms listed within the solicitation, a bid protest may be filed (Nacke & Ralston 2011). A bid protest is a tool that a contractor can use to legally contest the process or result of a government contract award. In order to file a protest, one must be considered an interested party, meaning they are an offeror or prospective offeror who would be financially affected by either the award or the non-award of the contract. There are three different types of protests available to contractors. Each has differing procedures but they share the main requirement; In order to win, they must provide supporting information which would prove that they have been prejudiced by the government agency. The two most common forms of bid protest are the agency-level protest and the Government Accountability Office (“Bid Protests,” 2010).…

    • 4029 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On §2-106 talks about cancellation of contract. BTT is cancelling the contract because management has change but BTT can be liable for the $25000 for the 90 days that Chou was to provide strat to BTT. It is on Chou’s favor that now BTT is terminating contract, and the previous management did not object to not getting the Strat on accorded time. But Chou can be taken to court for not filling his obligation to the verbal contract.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Part 14 Sealed Bidding; Part 15 Contracting by Negotiation; Subpart 6.2—Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources;Subpart 6.4—Sealed Bidding and Competitive Proposals…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Revocation of offer by offeror. an offeror can revoke the offer before it is accepted. in this contract, they do not state how long the contract be, or whether just express contract, or just when gregory have performance, provide Wessel…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    week 2

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Subsequent to reading the scenario, I discovered that there was a contract in place when BTT sent an email to Chau talking about the original terms of agreement. BTT sent Chou an e-mail where the topic line read “Strat Deal.” This email reiterated the main elements of the agreement. The elements included fees, the rights and responsibilities of both parties, and the length of time the project should be done.” This is when the contract became legal binding.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    person she thought he was. He tells her what to do the same way Logan did, just…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The story of a snitch starts out with John Dowery Jr. John was under house arrest for assisted murder and he was a drug addict. He was under house arrest for eleven months and he was facing up to eight years with out parole. But John was cut a deal, he agreed to become a witness in a murder trial. In exchange for his testimony the feds had eased the terms of hie pretrial detention. He was a changed man. He stopped doing drugs and actually got a job. But with his deal that he made he stamped the label “snitch” on to his forehead. One day he was walking home from work and he sensed something was wrong behind him. He turned around to find two men dressed in black with guns in their hands. The gunman fired and struck John in the…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Construction Contracts

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A construction contract can be terminated on the means of the need of the project. Will this project be useful to society, if not the contract can be terminated. Also the location of the project can also terminate the contract, if you are building an unsafe nuclear power plant in a populated area, the contract can be declined. Finally the cost…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics in Construction

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Yes, the owner has the right to seek additional offers, but should not be allowed to use the ideas of the contractor who had already won the bid if they decide to go with another offer.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Contract Disputes

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “CONTRACT DISPUTES REACH 15-YEAR HIGH”, was the heading of an article published, December 1, 2010 in the Government Executive. The heading in itself tells us that the government is doing more and more business by contract and as a result contractors who are lobbying for government business have become more aware of their rights to file disputes when it involves a loss of potential business. Because of this increase in disputes, the government must have a method of terminating contracts without suffering the financial liabilities that could result in millions and millions of dollars going to incomplete contracts and rebids to acquire a contractor for completion of unfinished contracts. This method of termination is known as a Default Clause which will be covered later in this paper. First we will look at a case that involves a contract dispute. The GAO file number: B-215789 which involves J.C. Hester Company, Inc who was awarded contract number: F34650-81-C-0158 with the Department of the Air Force. My reason for choosing this dispute case was because it requires that the individual look at all aspects of the case in reference to Disputes. Usually dispute cases depend on more than one aspect of the FAR. This case shows that not only the contractor but the contracting officer should pay strict attention to the reasons for the dispute. In this case knowledge of the Bids Protest Process area of the FAR is also required to determine if the recommendation by the Comptroller General was indeed valid and fair.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oppa Essay

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Any contractor, who claims to have suffered loss or injury due to a breach of these procedures by the Procuring Entity, may seek a review of the specific procurement process. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it should be noted that the following are not subject to review: (i) the selection of the method of procurement and (ii) the decision by the Procuring Entity to reject all tenders, proposals, offers or quotations.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics