Preview

Controversies in the Determination of Death

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1222 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Controversies in the Determination of Death
PHIL 1165
July 19, 2012
First Paper

In 2008, the President’s Council on Bioethics published the ‘Controversies in the Determination of Death’. Within the publication, the Council discusses the various criterions that need to be met in order for death to be declared. The criterions include those of a neurological level, which have been observed for over three decades. Although there have recently been objections to the neurological criterion in regards to death determination, the Council decided to maintain the criterion. In keeping the neurological criterion, the Council was correct, but the justification of the criteria is insufficient. The neurological criteria that must be met in order for death to be declared are the irreversible cessation of heartbeat, permanent inability to breath, and total brain failure. The neurological criteria work in such a way that if they are met, it is an indication that the individual is unable to perform the biological functions needed to continue to function as a human being. Meeting any of the criteria is an indication of death. If irreversible cessation of heartbeat and efforts to restore heartbeat prove unfruitful, then the heart does not pump blood around the body and the oxygen exchanges within blood is not able to occur nor are vital organs able to receive the blood and nutrients they need, which leads to total functional failure, the inability of organs to function. If the organs are unable to function, especially the heart, than the individual is unable to carry out any further life functions, and is therefore, dead. Permanent inability to breath does not allow the body to take in new oxygen and expel waste carbon dioxide, which further prevents the rest of the body from attaining new oxygen and performing its functions adequately. Although it may be argued that artificial ventilation can provide a means for an individual to be kept alive by breathing for them, but they are unable to breathe on their own and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Because there are so many complicated situations, there will always be a varying factor in the matter. The Uniform Declaration of Death Act makes a generally acceptable definition for death in which the medical system strictly abides. However, because of advances in medical technology, patients in a vegetable state can be kept alive by the use of ventilation and feeding tubes. The legal system is constantly challenged by the definition of death because they must still pay for medical treatments even though the individual has permanent termination of all functions of the entire brain, including the brain stem. Lia’s situation perfectly highlights this battle between legal and medical systems. The issue on describing a perceptible definition for death will continuously exist as long as new advances in medicine…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Euthanasia has recently been an active topic of debate due to elevated rate of patients diagnosed with painful and incurable illnesses. In James Rachel’s article, “Active and Passive Euthanasia,” he speaks of the invalid and impractical practice of passive euthanasia, which is endorsed by the American Medical Association. For many that are unfamiliar, euthanasia is the practice of painlessly killing a patient who is suffering for a painful and incurable disease. Rachel emphasises the unclear difference between active and passive killing in the medical world. The topics I would like to analyze from the article are first, the difference between active and passive euthanasia and the many relevant and irrelevant factors associated…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abstract The traditional distinction between active and passive euthanasia requires critical analysis. The conventional doctrine is that there is such an important moral difference between the two that, although the latter is sometimes permissible, the former is always forbidden. This doctrine may be challenged for several reasons. First of all, active euthanasia is in many cases more humane than passive euthanasia. Secondly, the conventional doctrine leads to decisions concerning life and death on irrelevant grounds. Thirdly, the doctrine rests on a distinction between killing and letting die that itself has no moral importance. Fourthly, the most common arguments in favor of the doctrine are invalid. I therefore suggest that the American Medical Association policy statement that endorses this doctrine is unsound. (N Engl J Med 292:78-80, 1975) The distinction between active and passive euthanasia is thought to be crucial for medical ethics. The idea is that it is permissible, at least in some cases, to withhold treatment and allow a patient to die, but it is never permissible to take any direct action designed to kill the patient. This doctrine seems to be accepted by most doctors, and it is endorsed in a statement adopted by the House of Delegates of the American Medical Association on December 4, 1973: The intentional termination of the life of one human being by another -mercy killing is contrary to that for which the medical profession stands and is contrary to the policy of the American Medical Association. The cessation of the employment of extraordinary means to prolong the life of the body when there is irrefutable evidence that biological death is imminent is the decision of the patient and/or his immediate family. The advice and judgment of the physician should be freely available to the patient and/or his immediate family. However, a strong case can be made against this doctrine. In what follows I will set out some of…

    • 3008 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a part of a medical field with economic and social implications, the idea of physician-assisted death will come in direct contact with forces such as costs reduction, personal prejudices, and limited access to care. For example, people with disabilities are often seen as individuals unable to live good, happy lives, and their impairment can be misdiagnosed as a terminal illness. Put simply, we all must be able to consult our physicians without the fear that their recommendations will be affected by quality-of-life…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kevorkian Essay

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jack Kevorkian- known as “Dr. Death”- was a man who had ignited a countrywide firestorm of argument after supervising and admitting at least 130 assisted suicides (Gray). “His first publicity acknowledged assisted suicide took place in 1990, but continued well through the decade as proponents and opponents of assisted suicide argued over the morality and ethics of helping the infirm end their suffering.” (Gray). The researcher believes what Kevorkian did is legally agreeable because his patients had control over their life, how he performed these actions, how this relates to society and how he consumed his patient’s consent.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brain Dead

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The tests show whether the brain has any blood flow to it and whether it is functioning. If there is no blood flow the brain dies. A Coma and brain death are different. A coma is an unconscious state from which you may recover; the brain keeps working even while the patient is unconscious. Brain death occurs when the brain has been so badly damaged from the lack of oxygen and blood supply, the brain stops functioning permanently. Both doctors must have at least five years of experience in their chosen specialty, must each perform a special set of tests, 2 to 12 hours apart, to determine brain death. Upon the second set of tests when the patient is pronounced brain dead, medically and legally this is the time, which is entered as the time of…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Physician assisted suicide is a highly controversial bioethical issue that has been increasingly debated in recent years. Advocates of physician assisted suicide argue that it champions patient autonomy and reduces suffering while opposers suggest the benefits outweigh the risks and that there are other acceptable alternatives to the practice. This paper attempts to demonstrate the permissibility of physician assisted suicide as a regulated, medically reliable end-of-life option that can help end the suffering of individuals struggling with terminal illnesses. This will be achieved while still providing a comprehensive view of both opponents’ and supporters’ perspectives on the issue, specifically regarding the nature of the death that comes…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    End of life counseling sessions where doctors advise patients how to conduct their own deaths have stirred up a firestorm of controversy in the press. These are sessions where a patient, who is terminally ill, talks with their doctor about their last wishes before they get to a state where they can no longer communicate, e.g. comatose. Supporters of these sessions hope that the dying and their doctors will have honest and open talks about death, coming to terms with this reality and being better prepared for it when it comes, putting the quality of life as defined by the patient over their quantity of life, which naturally would be critically short. Critics of the idea use the term “death panel” to imply that no consensus between doctor and patient would be reached and government programs would decide when to “pull the plug on grandma” and coldly decide when a patient should die. One of the biggest questions within this issue is how realistically we could approach an equal-sided doctor to patient counseling session. The balance is between…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clinical Death- a short interval follows in which heartbeat circulation, breathing, & brain functioning stop, but resuscitation is still possible.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Overall, most humans look for a dignified, peaceful death for themselves and their families/loved ones, whatever their stance is regarding Euthanasia”. However, the ethical issue arises when artificial termination of life if considered. Euthanasia advocates argue that being disallowed this practice is a breach of human rights, stating that all people should have a right to decide when and how their death should take place. Another pro-Euthanasia argument is to do with mercy, that if a person suffering intolerable pain which cannot be numbed by medication asks to end their life, that they should be given that right. People also believe that Euthanasia is inevitable anyway, and so it would be better for it to be carried out safely in order to prevent accidents.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brock’s overall thesis states that good reasons to allow voluntary active euthanasia exist. And that no compelling reasons to deny voluntary active euthanasia exist, if it is well regulated. His argument is guided by a few key principles. Patients…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sass, H. 2014, Brain life and brain death: A proposal for a normative agreement. The journal of medicine and philosophy, 39, pp. 45-59.…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death and Dying

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When a person is declared dead this meant that the patient is not breathing and the heart has stopped beating. New medical technology has helped in prolonging a life by making the heart and lungs function artificially; sometimes permitting one to recover. The heart and lungs functionality can be restored even if there is a complete and irreversible loss of all brain function with the use of artificial machinery. This has led to the proposal of a new set of clinical signs; the definition of ‘brain death’ is:‘the functionality of respiration and circulation is lost along with consciousness, thought and feelings.’ A lot of questions emerge, because with this reasoning if a person has spontaneous functioning of heart and lungs but no other vital signs are evident, then they are dead. What about people who are in a coma; those showing weak signs of “human life”; those mentally retarded or senile? Should they be considered as beings that don’t show sufficient…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia: An Overview

    • 2771 Words
    • 12 Pages

    There is a debate within the medical and bioethics literature about whether or not the non-voluntary (and by extension, involuntary) killing of patients can be regarded as euthanasia, irrespective of intent or the patient's circumstances. In the definitions offered by…

    • 2771 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Organ Donation-Support

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages

    | Brain death may result in legal death, but still with the heart beating, and with mechanical ventilation all other vital organs may be kept completely alive and functional, providing optimal opportunities for organ transplantation.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics