The fight for possession happens throughout our society's history and can lead to destruction.The controversy over personal property versus no ones property happens predominantly throughout both these novels. In the novel Heart of Darkness, Conrad continuously shows the greedy nature of the imperialist English explorer’s on the land within the congo and the controversy that they causes with aboriginal people living there. The imperialist nature of the English causes decay within the indigenous scenery and the native’s society through their acts of violence, greed, and there narcissistic attitude. Their greed causes the controversy of ”who owns what?” between the aboriginal people. The English argue that the land is theirs due to the fact that no one has possession of the land, and the natives argue that the land should have no possessor .“No one, as far as I know, unless a species of wandering trader---pestilential fellow, snapping ivory from the native’s hands” (Conrad 37) This quote taken from Heart of Darkness, Conrad uses Marlow to explain what the English are doing to the land, the impact of their actions upon the land has on the natives and the controversy it is causing within this novel. This controversy between personal property and no one's property is a consistent comparison of imperialistic versus native tensions within these novels. Within the novel The Secret River, the comparison of controversy between the English and the aboriginals on the island of Australia. The controversy of personal property versus no one's property is a very prominent within this novel that shows for a strong comparison between The Secret River and Heart of Darkness. In The Secret River, the controversy over possession begins when the main character William Thornhill is exiled to Australia from England and is given land down a river there that the British have supposedly claimed. This land that was given to William turns out to be land that a aboriginals tribe is living on"There were no signs that the blacks felt that the place belonged to them. They had no fences that said this is mine. No house that said, this is our home. There were no fields or flocks that said, we have put the labour of our hands into this place." (Grenville 94).This quotation demonstrates the abyss separating the Western understanding of ownership from the aboriginal conception that they and the land are one. The British colonists saw no reason not to take land and resources that had not been claimed by either public or private ownership. This brings up controversy between the English and the aboriginals due to the fact that English believe that its their land because they were the first one’s to claim the land and the aboriginals who believe that no one owns this land. This controversy brings out rage between both side and causes a fight to happen between both sides over the land “Captain McCallum demonstrated on the map how the natives would be penned in against the end of gully, where they rose up like sheers..... They were to be pushed, individually into the gully to be rid of there nuisance” (Grenville 262). This controversy becomes so strong to the point where the English plan to exterminate all the natives. These two prominent examples of controversy over personal property versus no one’s property are strong comparisons within the novels Heart of Darkness and The Secret River. Controversy is caused between disagreement between two different biased opinions, opinion between being civilized person is better or everyone’s equal.
To be civilized is having a high state of culture and social development. In the both these novels the controversy over being civilized is better versus everyones equal happens predominantly throughout these novels. Within the novel Heart of Darkness, the strive for the English to be more civilized causes controversy with the native’s in the novel. This controversy is caused due to the fact that the natives believe everyone is equal, no one is better. Conrad uses the English as a cornerstone to the racism controversy and showing that they are better because they are white, and civilized. The natives are taken into slavery, beaten “Therefore he whacked the old nigger mercilessly” (Conrad 8), and work to the point of almost dieing“Six black men advanced in a file, toiling up the path. They walked erect and slow, balancing small baskets full of earth on their heads, and the clink kept time with their footsteps. Black rags were wound round their loins, and the short ends behind wagged to and fro like tails. I could see every rib, the joints of their limbs were like knots in a rope; each had an iron collar on his neck, and all were connected together with a chain whose bights swung between them, rhythmically clinking”(Conrad 16) due to the English’s racist imperialist attitude. This imperialistic nature of the English causes the controversy causes tensions with the natives from the congo within this novel. The comparison of controversy over being civilized is better versus everyone’s equal. The controversy happens between the English and the natives prominently within the novel The Secret River. The English think to imperialize the island of Australia and create the island into a massive jail where they send all their convicts too “ain’t nothing in this world just for the taking…a man got to pay a fair price for taking. A matter of give a little, take a little.”(Grenville 104). Grenville uses this quote to show the belief system of the English and how the two different befiel systems causes controversy between the native and English. This thought of the English imperializing the island causes controversy with what the natives believe in, the belief that being civilized is not always better.
Innovation is explained as a thought, behavior, or somthing that is new. Innovation can be big or small, brandnew or just slightly different, seemingly complex or simple. Innovation are often thought of in terms of technical achievement, to improve. The controversy between innovation and the thought to leave things as is is really prominent between both novels Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad and The Secret River by Kate Grenville. In Heart of Darkness, the controversy between innovation and the thought to leave things as is is fought between English and the natives. The English strongly believe that the only way to create a better way of life is through innovation, to improve their standards of living. Through their thought to improving standards of life through innovation causes controversy with the natives in the congo due to their belief in a world that does not need improvement, and is self sustaining. This belief that the Natives have, cause the controversy between innovation and leave things as is with the English. The controversy between innovation versus leave things as is similar in the novel The Secret River. In The Secret River, the controversy between innovation and the thought of leaving things as is fought between the English and the natives."Sal made a place she called the yard, a patch of earth that she scraped and swept until it was smooth. Within its boundary she made something domestic: the fireplace, ringed with stones ... the water barrel filled from the rivulet, a slab of log laid on a couple of stones that did duty as a table. She cooked and washed and swept, and sat on a log to mend children's clothes or grind up the hominy, just like any other housewife. Beyond the yard she went only for a call of nature, and did not dally." (Grenville 149) This quote talks about how Sal's yard symbolizes the division between the wilderness and the savages and civilization through innovation of the property. The imperialist mindset of the English shows their belief through innovation and that its the only way to create a better life,and improve their standards of living.
Controversy between society leads to division between it. The controversy within society is similar between the novels explained throughout. The strong comparison between The Secret River by Kate Grenville and Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad is the controversy between imperialism versus native tensions. The three strong comparisons of controversy within these are personal property versus no ones property, being civilized is better versus everyones equal, and innovation versus leave things as is. The controversy within these two different but similar novels cause division within the due to the different attitudes.
Work cited
Conrad, Joseph. Heart of darkness. Charlottesville, Va.: University of Virginia Library, 1996. Print.
Grenville, Kate. The secret river. New York: Canongate ;, 2005. Print.
"Controversy | Define Controversy at Dictionary.com." Dictionary.com | Find the Meanings and Definitions of Words at Dictionary.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Jan. 2013.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
‘Conflict’ involves the clash of interests, ideas and expectations. It can also mean a fight or a struggle, ranging from a battle or violent clash between armies to antagonism between two people. In The Secret River, conflict takes many forms, from bloody disputes over territory between whites and blacks, to the discrepancy in opinions about an ideal place to settle down for Sal and William Thornhill.…
- 748 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
A balanced amount of controversy can be good but too much controversy can quickly become a problem. For example, the Enola Gay exhibition at the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, D.C controversy. The Enola Gay exhibition was supposed to be a part of an interpretive exhibit reflecting the end of World War II and the origins of the Cold War. However, because there is two sides to the event and curators had a difficult time creating a balance which negatively affected the painful memory of those involved, thus creating a controversy over history and memory. On the one side, the Enola Gay bomb ended WWII, while on the other side, which sticks out the most is the fact that the bomb killed a lot of innocent civilians, which can be a…
- 377 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The conflict identified in the story “The things they carried” by Tim O’Brien and “A Point West of San Bernardino” by Juan Delgado centers on the struggle people can go through while trying to live in the world. Which represents in some cases how we see the world and what we carry along with us, showing that humans there are many things that we carry with us that we don’t pay any attention to unless we are forced to. Clugston stated, “Conflict is the struggle that shapes the plot in a story (Clugston, 2014).”…
- 652 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
2. So far, I haven’t got the big picture of the conflict in this book. This book is very complicated, yet thoughtful. The author brings us back to some years in the past and that must be hard. For me who likes to write, it’s difficult to keep the…
- 916 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
When discussing conflict everyone has their own definition, but it would generally be agreed that it requires a disagreement between individuals within a group. However, my definition of conflict would be a mental struggle between the character and a clash between two or more characters with different interests. A conflict presents itself in various forms. It may also come willingly or unwillingly affecting a person's mind or a person's actions. A conflict can either be a blessing or a curse. This essay will show how 3 books with different conflicts changed a character's life or the characters' way of thinking.…
- 643 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Controversy. Quite the word of many meanings. Certain events throughout an individual's life will spark ember of these controversial opinions, all which are subjective to that individuals perception of them. History seems to be the central relier of controversy and for decades individuals of all ages, races, and genders have quarreled together or against one another of topics debatable. One which has been discussed for a many of years now, is that of Andrew Jackson and his overall worthiness of being on such a high heald, profound piece of paper.…
- 1335 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
In Joseph Conrad's "The Heart Of Darkness", the main idea is that even the most civilized person has an evil side. When a man that appears to be civilized enters a jungle, he does things that he normally would not do. Every human beings has a dark side, and are able to do the most bizarre acts. this essay will examine How once a civilized man is taken out of the constraints of his society and allowed to follow his dreams, some of those desires can be pretty evil.…
- 687 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the book Heart of Darkness there are several aspects to imperialism. As Marlow travels from the Outer Station to the Central Station and finally up the river to the Inner Station, he encounters scenes of torture, cruelty, and near-slavery. At the very least, the incidental scenery of the book offers a harsh picture of colonial enterprise. The impetus behind Marlow's adventures, too, has to do with the hypocrisy inherent in the rhetoric used to justify imperialism. The men who work for the Company describe what they do as "trade," and their treatment of native Africans is part of a benevolent project of "civilization." Kurtz, on the other hand, is open about the fact that he does not trade but rather takes ivory by force, and he describes his own treatment of the natives with the words "suppression" and "extermination": he does not hide the fact that he rules through violence and intimidation. His perverse honesty leads to his downfall, as his success threatens to expose the evil practices behind European activity in Africa. However, for Marlow as much as for Kurtz or for the Company, Africans in this book are mostly objects: Marlow refers to his helmsman as a piece of machinery, and Kurtz's African mistress is at best a piece of statuary. It can be argued that Heart of Darkness participates in an oppression of nonwhites that is much more sinister and much harder to remedy than the open abuses of Kurtz or the Company's men."Everything belonged…
- 681 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
For instance, when the pilot is struck by a spear from the natives and Marlow is about to remove it, Conrad states that “ he looked at me anxiously, gripping the spear like something precious, with an air of being afraid I would try to take it away from him. I had to make an effort to free my eyes from his gaze…” (122). This piece from the text is metaphor to Africa and how people do not want see or know what they are doing to Africa. Marlow has seen the first-hand effects of imperialism in the Congo but does not come out and show his dissatisfaction but goes along with the violence and cruelty surrounding him station to station. Conrad is showing how people know that others are being slaughtered along with destruction of nature but pretend to turn away from these facts by “ closing their eyes” like Marlow. The reasoning for this is that people know that the reason this is occurring is because of their materialistic needs but they attempt to the hide from the truth. Conrad uses this technique of metaphors to allow the reader to judge right from wrong by giving an understanding and view of what imperialism does. Moreover, Conrad sums the entire purpose of imperialism into a phrase. Conrade practically defines imperialism by stating that it is the “ the vilest scramble for loot that ever disfigured the history of human conscience and…
- 871 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Psychoanalysis is known as the theory in which our unconscious plays a big role in the actions that we take and the way our minds work in a way that goes beyond our awareness. Sigmund Freud is credited with this discovery and also with establishing an understanding of a big part of human psychology. Through Freud’s theory of repression, one can conclude that suppressed desires present themselves in unusual and unexpected ways. In Joseph Conrad’s “Heart Of Darkness”, Conrad portrays Freud’s theory of repression in the characters of Kurtz and Marlow by showing how their inner desires begin to take control of their minds and demonstrating that there…
- 1457 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
There are various motives for Imperialism attributed to the different characters in Joseph Conrad’s novel, The Heart of Darkness. Each and every character has their own opinions on the concept of imperialism. While some of them agree with one another, others disagree with one another. Just like Richard Meinertzhagen, Karl Pearson, Joseph Chamberlain, and Cecil Rhodes, they all had their own beliefs in Imperialism that may have contradicted another. In the novel the characters don’t all just complement each other there’s a bit of conflict in their view and opinions on motives for Imperialism.…
- 947 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Conflict is inevitable and is something everyone encounters. Individual’s responses are dependent upon their moral conscience, their ideologies or their strengths and weaknesses. An individual’s public persona may differ drastically and oppose their true qualities. In confrontation with conflict ones true identity can be revealed. Although under the pressure of conflict individuals can be provoked to act unwillingly to preserve themselves. The novel ‘The Secret River’ by Kate Grenville portrays the protagonist William Thornhill as a moral individual yet under the pressure of survival and success he weakens. The reputation of an individual can provoke unexpected sinister…
- 1112 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
In Neil Bissoondath’s “I’m Not Racist But…” the narrator intends to bring awareness to his readers on the connection between stereotyping and racism and condemns such acts against one another, while in Joseph Conrad’s “Heart of Darkness, the protagonist informs his audience on the consequences of African colonization. Bissoondath’s work is oriented to educate the reader in the different types of racial acts leading to hatred, abuse or enforcement of power toward any given group of people. He condemns their use whether ignorantly or intentionally. Conrad’s work however, informs the reader of how the goals of the European settlers in Africa, such as ….., led them to exploit the Africans and their raw materials for the purpose of earning profits.…
- 830 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The value of imperial domination is explored in Conrad's Heart of Darkness through the character Marlow and Kurtz. The novel was written during the time of New Imperialism where European countries were in conflict with one another, trying to claim African territories known as the "Scramble for Africa." This context is reflected in the novel when the narrator, Marlow, thinks aloud in, “Now when I was a little chap I had a passion for maps. I would look for hours at South America, or Africa, or Australia, and lose myself in all the glories of exploration... when I saw one that looked particularly inviting on a map (but they all look that) I would put my finger on it and say, When I grow up I will go there." This shows the innate want and need to dominate in European culture, expressed through accumulative listing. Furthermore, the use of high modality language in "I…
- 1791 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness, the main character, Marlow travels through the Congo, witnessing scenes of torture, cruelty and near-slavery. The incidental scenery of the book offers a harsh picture of colonial enterprise. The book is regarded as an attack on imperialism and criticizes the immoral treatments of the European colonizers in Africa in the 19th century. However, the dehumanization of the Africans, and use of Africa as a backdrop setting for Marlow’s thought process, rather than an important focus has to do with hypocrisy inherent in the rhetoric used to justify imperialism.…
- 1795 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays