Model of thinking
Corporate Social Responsibility
Positive Social Change
Employee Commitment
Competitive Advantage
Organizational Success
Corporate Social Responsibility
Positive Social Change
Employee Commitment
Competitive Advantage
Organizational Success
The above diagram shows the model of argument which will be discussed in this essay, it includes the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and organizational success. In between, we will see how CSR influences employees’ commitment and brings about positive change to the society, and how these elements result in competitive advantage of an organization, which determines a successful organization.
(i) What is corporate social responsibility (CSR)?
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) can be defined as “the firm’s considerations of, and response to, issue beyond the narrow economic, technical, and legal requirements of the firm to accomplish social and environmental benefits along with the traditional economic gains which the firm seeks”. (Davis (1973) cited by R. Aguilera,D. Rupp, C. Williams and J. Ganapathi, 2007) Also, we can say that CSR is the positive effect of corporate social or environment performance on corporate financial performance, and how firms make contribution to the society welfare in a long term. Aguilera, Rupp, Williams and Ganapathi (2007) also cited from Mackey, Mackey, and Barney (2005) that investment in socially responsible initiatives will maximize the market of the firm, which we can conclude this is a kind of organizational success.
(ii) CSR and Employee commitment
According to a study,
References: Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, L. A. & Williams, C. A. (2007). Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Multiple Theory of Social Change in Organization. Academy of Management Review, 32 (3), 836–863. Mohr, L. A, Webb, D. J. & Harris, K. A. (2001). Do Consumers Expect Companies to be Socially Responsible? The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Buying Behavior. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35 (1). Greening, D. W., Turban, D. B. (2000). Corporate Social Performance As a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce. Business & Society, 39 (3), 254-280. Dawkins, J. & (2004). Corporate responsibility: The communication challenge. Journal of Communication Management, 9 (2), 108-119. Payne, J. & Raiborn, C. A. (2001). Sustainable Development: The Ethics Support Dinah M. Payne the Economics. Journal of Business Ethics, 32 , 157-168. Ramus, C. A. & (2001). Organizational Support for Employees: Encouraging Creative Ideas for Environment Sustainability. CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 43 (3). Johnson, D. B. (1998). Green businesses: Perspectives from management and business ethics. Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal, 11 (3), 259-266. Rodriguez, J., Ricart & Sanchez (2002). Sustainable Development and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage: A Dynamic and Sustainable View of the Firm. Creativity and Innovation Management, 11 (3), 135–146. Newbert, S., & (2008). Value, Rareness, Competitive Advantage, and Performance: A Conceptual-Level Empirical Investigation of the Resource-based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 29 , 745–768. Ven Van De, B. & Graafland, J. J. (2006). Strategic and moral motivation for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 22 , 111-123.