Preview

Coriolanus Relationship

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
524 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Coriolanus Relationship
Coursework essay – Coriolanus
Describe an important relationship in the play and explain why this relationship was important
In Shakespeare’s tragedy Coriolanus, he shows us the way the relationship with a person can lead that person to his downfall. This is shown in the relationship between Coriolanus and the plebeians. The plebeians lead to the downfall of Caius Martius Coriolanus because they are the ones that banish him from Rome. The relationship between Caius Martius and the plebeians is one that consists of hate from both sides. Caius Martius maintains the old tradition where one group holds most of the power and most of the people have little to no power. Martius holds on to this mindset and tries to implement this. His heritage plays a big role as he is of patrician lineage, and his mother Volumnia has raised Martius to believe that the plebeians are inferior and are not of good social status. An example is when Martius says “who deserves greatness, deserves your hate, and your affections are a sick man’s appetite, (page 13, lines 159-161).” Martius perceives the plebeians as stupid and weak as they are unable to fend for themselves. He also believes that the plebeians don’t deserve any of the power that the patricians give them.
…show more content…
He also thinks that they are fickle and easy to manipulate. This is shown when Menenius manipulates them by saying a fable about the body (act 1 and scene 1). He also believes that their desperation to get all that they want in their unreasonable demands is a weakness that can turn them against the patricians. Martius also thinks that the plebeians speculate about things that are way above their head. He says that “They’ll sit by the fire and presume to know what’s done i’th’Capitol, (page 15, lines

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The Roman's godlike worship of Caesar threatens the prominence of the Senate. To retain his dominance Mark Antony chooses to become a close ally to him. Cassius, Brutus, and the other conspirators however, plot Caesar’s demise. In the end, Mark Antony finds high esteem and the conspirators receive banishment and death. The play is an example, or maybe even a warning, that our actions and reactions have real effects. Brutus, Cassius, Casca, Cinna, Trebonius, and Cimber respond swiftly and without thought to Caesar’s rise and pay a heavy price for it in the end. Mark Antony sees the worth in being Caesar’s friend, and their friendship benefits him when Caesar is dead. In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare the principal characters' initial reactions to Caesar’s rise affect their conclusive outcomes.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1.1.37-39: A tribune is speaking to the commoners saying that they are lazy, stupid, and useless because they do not know about what happened to Pompey (Caesar killed Pompey but it was not shown in the play). They also say this because the commoners are not working and instead celebrating Caesar’s rule, making the tribunes angrier because the tribunes favor Pompey’s rule.…

    • 1455 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Coriolanus, Shakespeare to a full extent questions the value of the Roman warrior code and sees the difficulties that it causes. Firstly I discuss the warrior code that is valued and held in Rome. Secondly I analyze Coriolanus inability to infringe the warrior code entirely. Thirdly I explore the consequences this has on Roman society.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Polus is confused how it would matter, in terms of the man’s power, whether the man is killing justly or unjustly as long as he is doing as he pleases. This is where Socrates states his main argument for the section; “doing injustice happens to be the greatest of evils” (469b7). Here is where there is yet another shift in dialogue. Polus, confused by Socrates’ bold claim, inquires whether suffering injustice would actually be a greater evil than committing it. To prove that committing an injustice such as ruling as a tyrant…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    | The Devil and Tom WalkerTom is starting to venture out on his own a bit from organized religion a la the transcendentalists, but later in life robotically comes back to it without real passion or interest.His adamant adherence to religion is likened to his adamant adherence to greed and rings false.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Republic Study Guide

    • 2098 Words
    • 8 Pages

    - He makes Thrasymachus admit that the view he is advancing promotes injustice as a virtue. In this view, life is seen as a continual competition to get more (more money, more power, etc.), and whoever is most successful in the competition has the…

    • 2098 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Romeo & Juliet: Explore the ways in which Shakespeare presents and uses the idea of conflict in Romeo & Juliet…

    • 2427 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without any power, a society tends to become irrational, indecisive and flavorless. This ideal is portrayed in all scenes including plebeians, whether through direct or indirect characterization. The premiering scene portrayed Marullus and Flavius along the streets, scolding commoners for being hypocrites. “You blocks, you stones, you worse than senseless things!/O you hard hearts, you cruel men of Rome,/Knew you not Pompey?” (1.1.27-29) was proclaimed by Marullus, in protest of Caesars’ celebrations. This reveals that the common people of Rome are easily swayed, as they cheered for Caesar defeating his predecessor, after recently cheering for Pompey himself. An exquisite example of the citizens’ complacency comes from the Third Plebeian. He states,“The noble Brutus is ascended: silence” (3.2.14) but yet, after a short speech from Antony regarding the conspirators, he claims, “There’s not a nobler man in Rome than Antony”( 3.2.96). Furthermore, when attending to Caesar,“We are bless’d that Rome is rid of him”(3.2.48) stated the citizens, only to later say, “They were villains, murderers” (3.2.135) merely for doing the very “ridding” they praised! Complicity and irrationality are portrayed by the violent outburst, “Revenge!—About!—Seek!—Burn!/Fire!—Kill!—Slay! Let not a traitor live” (3.2.183-184) from the citizens, once Antony’s speech is…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Shakespeare’s drama, bias and self-interest, more than anything else, are the key elements of the conflicting perspectives fabricated in the play. Shakepeare unites the epic legedary stories of nationalism in the history of Julius Caesar to the lyrical stage craft of the theatre. The drama provides a visual realism of the fortitude of men; it highlights the self-acting individual and their ability to supersede values of patriotism and nationalism when self-interest becomes apparent. A key example of this is the character Brutus. The characterisation of Brutus changes throughout the play. So the audience is left with the conflicting perspective of who Brutus is; they are only left with the representation of who he is, only to work out for themselves who the true Brutus is. At the beginning of the play, the audience is shown a character who is noble, good, patriotic, honourable but most of all, proud of Rome. He is also depicted to be loyal. “Brutus has rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” This quote from Act 1 scence 2, shows the inital view of Brutus at the start of the play; it portrays him as noble and loyal to Rome. This becomes a motif throughout the play…

    • 2407 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Julius Caesar Flaws

    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Written by Shakespeare more than one thousand five hundred years after Julius Caesar’s death, Julius Caesar, Shakespeare’s well-known tragedy, is unique in that it contains two tragic characters, the senator Brutus and emperor Caesar. A play in five acts, Julius Caesar attempts to portray the assassination of Caesar, at that time victorious over Pompey’s sons, and the civil war that follows, culminating in the establishment of the Second Triumvirate. Although Caesar meets his end comparatively early in the third act, both Brutus and Caesar are adequately portrayed as men of high repute who, through flawed actions and decisions, meet an untimely end. In short, both are tragic heroes.…

    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Julius Caesar Essay

    • 1011 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the initial scenes of his play, Shakespeare clearly outlines the distinct conflict of perspectives held by his main protagonists; Antony and Cassius regarding Caesar. Shakespeare’s representation of Antony incorporates that of a humble, loyal and devoted disciple of Caesar; embodied in his vow “When Caesar says, ‘Do this’, it is performed.” Antony’s obedient tone, linked with the concise manner in which he replies to Caesar, captures the utter willingness to serve “Caesar, (his) lord.” In contrast, Shakespeare exhibits Cassius’ bitterness and envy of Caesar as he influences Brutus’ inner confusion to the viewpoint he considers correct. Cassius provides an analogy further encouraging the traitorous desires; “he doth bestride the narrow world like a colossus, and we petty men walk under his huge legs.” Here Cassius employs a sarcastic tone to aggressively attack Caesar’s authority as a leader, “such a feeble temper should so get the start of…

    • 1011 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare's play "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar" is one that transcends time from the Roman times to the Elizabethan times and to the present. "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar" has characters which display similar mindsets of those in Elizabethan times and today. Many of the characters in the play have a certain motivation to complete a long-term or short term goal. These motives arise from things like a strive for perfection, ambition and greed among people who are subservient. Each character in Julius Caesar has his own motivation whether it is the soothsayer who wanted to warn Caesar or Cassius who wanted to kill him. The nature of human beings was clearly represented as characters in the play had different motives but ended up wanting to…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although Reckitt Benckiser Group may not be a household name, its products certainly are. Look in the kitchen, laundry or medicine cabinet of almost any household in the Americas and you’ll see Lysol, Woolite, French’s mustard, Electrosol dishwasher detergent, Mucinex and, for teenagers, Clearasil acne medicine.…

    • 2481 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Work Environment Paper

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Good communication skills are imperative for organizations to carry out in an attempt to maintain outstanding performance from employees and management. Every workplace is unique in terms of their diversity profile therefore, is it vital for organization to create and execute creative communication methodologies that will enable organizations to develop a community rather than just your average run of the mill work environment. For example, active listening, collective goal setting and consistent training are all examples of tools in which organizations can effectively use to promote and execute effective communication within the workplace. So how well do individuals within an organization communicate with each other? This paper will analyze the amount, types, options, location and speed of communication that is practiced within the FACS Group Inc culture. In addition, this paper will explain how effective team building applies to FACS Group Inc work environment. Furthermore, this paper will include a brief summary of the selected chapter on effective team building, as well as provide my own communication analysis.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays