Corporal Punishment

Corporal punishment ethics are well recognized to have altered over time. Their alternations are in blame for a worldwide controversy amongst individuals as they oppose different sides. Numerous caretakers argue that corporal punishment should not be abolished as rebellious behaviors have increased amongst generations. They feel that corporal punishment should be enforced in the school system as help improve rebellious behavior. At the same time, other caretakers argue that corporal punishment should be abolished. They feel that caretakers are surpassing corporal punishment as they are turning it into child abuse. Corporal punishment is still practiced despite of the opinions of numerous individuals. Despite the approving of corporal punishment of several caretakers, I personally oppose corporal punishment as it can bring out negative mentally along psychological behaviors. I feel that various caretakers are taking corporal punishment to extreme measure as several do not recognize when enough is enough. I feel that corporal punishment is not an effective means of discipline. I feel that such practices simply augment to rebellious, aggressive, and antisocial behavior. The authors to “Is Corporal Punishment an effective means of discipline” (2002), an article in the American Psychological Association corporal punishment state that corporal punishment can in fact build up antisocial behavior in children such as emotional and physical problems. In addition, the authors state that brutalizing children can lower their self-esteem and teaching them poor self-control can lead them into unsatisfying relationships with others. Furthermore, “Is Corporal Punishment an effective means of discipline” (2002), states that corporal punishment can cause children to become brutalizing adults. Elizabeth Thompson Gershoff, of the National Center for Children in Poverty at Columbia University, observed both positive and negative behaviors of children who were associated with corporal