Preview

Corporate Level Strategy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
690 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Corporate Level Strategy
Diversification strategy is used to increase the firm’s value by improving its overall performance. Value here is created here either through related diversification ( my report) or through unrelated diversification ( which will be discussed further) when the strategy allows a company’s business to increase revenues or reduce cost while implementing their business –level strategies
In some case, using diversification strategy may have nothing to do with increasing the firm’s value; in fact it can have neutral effects or even reduce firm’s value. Value neutral reasons for diversification include those of a desire to match and thereby neutralize a competitor’s market power ( such as to
There are 2 ways diversification strategies can create value. One is operational relatedness (sharing activities)the other one is corporate relatedness ( transfer of core competencies).
Economies of scope- are cost savings that the firm creates by successfully sharing some of its resources and capabilities or transferring one or more corporate-level core competencies that were developed in one of its businesses to another of its business. To created economies of scope, tangible resources such as plant and equipment or other business unit physical assets, often must be shared. Less tangible resources, such as manufacturing know –how, also can be shared. However, know-how transferred between separate activities with no physical or tangible resource involved is a transfer of a corporate-level core competencies, not an operational sharing of activities.
Operational Relatedness: Sharing Activities
Firms can create operational relatedness by sharing either a primary activity (such as inventory delivery systems) or a support activity (such as purchasing activities)- VALUE CHAIN. Firms using related constrained diversification strategy share activities to create value. Example: Procter and Gamble uses their corporate level strategy because P&G paper towel business and baby diaper

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Comm 210 notes

    • 2409 Words
    • 10 Pages

    • Short‐term thinking: making a quick buck and trying to gain competitive edge through unrelated diversification…

    • 2409 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comm 210 Review

    • 3705 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Diversification: When companies buy a wide variety of other businesses. Chandler says not understanding the business will not allow you to build the business. If you are going to diversify, then do it in related businesses.…

    • 3705 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    FIN 571 Final EXAM

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Principle of Diversification states that investors are better off by investing in two or three good assets even within the same industry.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I recommend conglomerate diversification for expanding product and service offerings for new customers, possibly within the DoD. By leveraging the robust customer base, relationships and track record of…

    • 4751 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When diversification involves additions of a business related to the firm in terms of technology, markets or products, it involves…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    P1 M1 D1 unit 3

    • 1689 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Is where they take a product into a new market. It is a slight risk as the company may not have experience in this market. An example of this is when Apple decided to enter the market for MP3 as to their original market of computers.…

    • 1689 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The essay has been structured into four parts: Firstly a brief definition of diversification and types with examples from IBM and Virgin Empire, Secondly, why companies decide to diversify and the implications with examples from Virgin Empire, British American Tobacco, Philip Morris and Lego, Thirdly, theorist views on diversification and why it is deemed as a poor strategy and concludes with that the success or failure of diversification depends on the prior performance of the company.…

    • 2418 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Staples, Inc. Swot

    • 1971 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Strategies for attaining competitive advantages emphasize developing and configuring existing resource strengths into a valuable and unique resource base. If the firm's resources are unique, rare, valuable, and inimitable, they can be a source of core…

    • 1971 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Capstone Notes

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * There is an inverted “U” relationship between firm diversification and firm performance. In other words, at some point increased diversification is thought to impede performance. Why is this?…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    the power to cross-subsidise one business from the profits of the others. On the one hand, the…

    • 16059 Words
    • 65 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Strategic grouping (differentiation) creating links across those boundaries thru strategic linking (integration) and aligning other elements of the organization (such as rewards and incentives)…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Creating Corporate Strategy

    • 7369 Words
    • 30 Pages

    What has slipped under the radar are those companies-the majority, we would argue-that don't destroy value at the corporate level, but neither do they create it. That failure is not for lack of trying. Indeed, in many of the 50 companies we studied during a sixyear research project, corporate executives were struggling to create viable corporate strategies. Some were working on their core competencies, others were restructuring their corporate portfolios, and still others were building learning organizations. In each case, executives were focusing on individual elements of corporate strategy: resources, businesses, or organization. What was missing was the insight that turns those elements into an integrated whole. That insight is the essence of corporate advantage - the way a company creates value through the configuration and coordination of its multibusincss activities. Ultimately, it is Vk^hat differentiates truly great corporate strategies from the merely adequate.…

    • 7369 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    UTC Case

    • 883 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One benefit UTC realized by pursuing an unrelated diversification strategy is the best practices realized at one company can be applied to other companies. By applying best practices learned from one company across all companies, UTC recognized they could improve…

    • 883 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nestle Ansoff Matrix

    • 1791 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Diversification is the most risky of the four growth strategies since it requires both products and market development and may be outside the core competencies of the firm. In fact, this quadrant of the matrix has been referred to by some as the “suicide cell”. However, diversification may be a reasonable choice if the high risk is compensated by the chance of a…

    • 1791 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mclays Strategy Analysis

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In an organizations there can be team roles and individual roles towards implementing the strategy. Role of executives include development and implementation of the strategy, whereas the role of the directors include providing required input, reviewing the strategy, approving the strategy and providing a vision for implementation (Davila, et al., 2012). Therefore though the responsibility of actual implementation process carried out properly lies with the executives, directors are responsible for the overall strategy implementation. For this company, it is suggested to apply the limited market strategies like market penetration, new product development and market development. In addition to that, in this organization conglomerate diversification strategy is suggested too. To implement these strategies individual roles and team roles needed to be carried out effectively. According to the role theory by Katz and Kahn, the roles are the result of expectation from other people, however, roles and responsibilities conflict arises when roles are ambiguous, role overload, conflicting role pressures and conflict between two roles (Hitt, et al., 2017). Therefore, one needs to be clear about the roles and scrupulous designing of roles needed to be done for successful…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays