Preview

Cosmological

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
347 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cosmological
Cosmological arguments
Kalam cosmological argument
The aim of this argument is to show that the universe had a beginning in the finite past. The argument battles against the existence of an infinite, temporal regress of past events which implies a universe that has infinitely existed. This argument implies the existence of a First Cause.
The form of the argument is:
1. Whatever begins to exist has a cause.
2. The universe began to exist.
3. Therefore, the universe has a cause.
Thomistic cosmological argument
1. What we observe in this universe is contingent (i.e. dependent, or conditional)
2. A sequence of causally related contingent things cannot be infinite
3. The sequence of causally dependent contingent things must be finite
Conclusion: There must be a first cause in the sequence of contingent causes
Leibnizian cosmological argument
The argument comes from a German polymath, Gottfriend Wilhelm Leibniz. Leibniz wrote, "The first question which should rightly be asked is this: why is there something rather than nothing?"
The argument runs as follows:
1. Every existing thing has an explanation of its existence, either in the necessity of its own nature or in an external cause.
2. If the universe has an explanation of its existence, that explanation is God.
3. The universe is an existing thing.
4. Therefore the explanation of the universe is God.
Some atheists object to premise 2 in that God does not have to be the explanation, but that the universe can be what is called a necessary being (one which exists of its own nature and have no external cause). This was a suggestion of David Hume who demanded, "Why may not the material universe be the neccesarily existent being?" (Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, part 9). The Kalam Cosmological Argument is helpful. If Hume (and other atheists) is right in saying that the universe is a necessary being/thing, then this implies that the universe is eternal. This is exactly what the Kalam argument seeks

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    the tunnel of samos

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are, however, some convincing explana-tions, the oldest of which is based on a theoretical…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his article, William lane Craig provides his perspective on the Kalam cosmological argument in the Existence of God and the beginning of the universe. Craig…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another argument that provides evidence for the existence of God is the Anthropic Principle. This idea states that the cosmos (i.e. the universe) was created for the sole purpose of creating and supporting intelligent life. F.R. Tennant proposed the idea, he summarised his opinion of the universe into one key quotation “as we look out into the universe and identify the many…

    • 984 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Into Thin Air by Jon Krakaeur, the author’s word choice of descriptive passages and vivid words help well understand his perspective. You see this whole story is written in perspective Jon Krakauer is a journalist by trade, and his motive for going on the Everest expedition is to write an article about the experience of climbing as part of a commercial expedition. The perspective is in the first person, but with a journalistic viewpoint. Krakauer often seems removed from the subject, describing events as objectively as possible, as one would expect in a journalistic article. For example, he is sometimes critical of his fellow climbers, even though elsewhere he describes…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Starting off, the atheistic view of the beginning of the universe occurring by chance is irrational and irreverent in many ways. The thought of the universe just existing from no cause, let alone not a personal cause is just illogical. This universe has a contingency for God and the Kalam cosmological argument proves this. The Kalam cosmological argument is a well-organized argument for God that has been developed from Muslim philosophers al-Kindi and al-Ghazali, and has been reinvented by philosopher William Lane Craig. The Kalam argument is very simple and straightforward. It is dealt with as a series of dilemmas. Those dilemmas starts with since the universe exists, is there a beginning or no beginning, is that beginning caused or uncaused, and is that cause personal or impersonal. The first premise states that whatever begins to exist as a cause. This premise if very logical and denying it is only possible to have things come from a cause is counterintuitive. The second premise of the Kalam cosmological argument states that universe began…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cosmicomics

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The way in which Calvino conveys his thoughts throughout Cosmicomics in simple terms was perplexing. Without any background information as to when the piece was published originally it was hard to determine what time era the work was from. Was it a Romantic piece or a modern day wonder? The ever flowing word structure with an eloquent description about almost everything made it seem that is may have been from the Romantic period but upon further analysis it was ruled out. The constant stringing of ideas and building off them in a way seemed to advanced for that time period. The copious science fiction references about the universe was also a tell sign. However, the romance and human qualities that Calvino applied to natural wonder like the moon not only created a sense of he sublime it has that feel good quality of a Romantic piece.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Whatever has the possibility of non existence, yet exists, has been caused to exist. Something cannot bring itself into existence, since it must exist to bring itself into existence, which is illogical.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The cosmological argument for the existence of God. .... The first thing to note about the cosmological argument is that it is A Posteriori. ....…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is weird and oddly strange when a description of the devil or also know as “Satan” in Dante’s Inferno, Dante gives the description of Satan as being a frozen three headed hairy being with a tremendous huge width of bat wings .…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In The Cosmological Argument Premise 2 explains that everything cannot be a dependent living thing. William Rowe explains why the Principle of Sufficient reason is true, then premise 2 is also true. Rowe suggests that there has never been a self-existing living thing, but only an infinite series of dependent living things. In this case, every living thing has an explanation, because it is explained if a living thing that came before it then that caused its existence.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The cosmological argument proves the existence of God. It discusses contingent beings which exist, but could not have existed and necessary beings which exist and could not not exist. The cosmological says that there is a contingent being that exists. The existence of a contingent being must have a cause and the contingent being cannot be the cause of itself. The complete cause of a contingent being includes only other contingent beings or it includes a necessary being. Contingent beings alone cannot be the complete cause of a contingent being. The complete cause of a contingent being must include a necessary being. Therefore, a necessary being must exist. The cosmological argument shows that there must be a higher power, and that higher power is God. Everything that exists on earth is a contingent being. There is no person or animal that is not contingent. But what created everything to begin with if a contingent being cannot be the only cause of another contingent being? Everything on earth has a cause, but there must be a necessary being being that caused the Earth. There has to be something other than contingent beings. There has to be a necessary being that started everything. That necessary being is…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On Being an Atheist

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Does the universe exist? If the universe exists, what caused it to exist? The universe itself could not have created or caused itself. If the cause or explanation for the universe is something other than itself, what is that cause. If the universe is a contingent being, did other contingent beings cause it or did a non-contingent being cause the universe? Something caused the universe to exist. There was a First Cause. This First Cause has no beginning and no end, it is eternal. What could possibly be powerful enough to create the universe with all of its complexity and depth if not God? To say that contingent things just exist with no cause does not explain why they exist. Can a contingent being give an explanation for how or why it exists? If not, it follows that the only explanation is a non-contingent being began the process. The Cosmological Argument is not meant to give exhaustive proof for the existence of God. It is just a piece of the pie that encourages a…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Philosophy Response Paper

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In McCloskey's article he states that "the mere existence of the world constitutes no reason for believing in such a being."{1} This appears to be his main issue with the cosmological argument. But Evans and Manis discuss a non-temporal form of the cosmological argument. They break down the non-temporal form into three different parts. The first one being that some contingent beings exist. Secondly, if any contingent beings exist, then a necessary being must exist. And thirdly, a necessary being does exist. I feel that they realize the issue that the absolute reoccurring of evidence proves a contingent being exists might give the idea that there is not a definitive reason to the cause. The cause of the universe is necessary because the cause is God, and God's existence is what is uncaused and absolute.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Design Argument

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages

    ii) Comment on the view that the design argument provides coherent explanation for the universe.…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Space Time

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages

    If we are looking for the fabled “theory of everything", it is best to start the quest with the…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays