Professor William Honsberger
PHI 111 (sec 004)
12/15/15
Analysis of William Lane Craig’s The Existence of God and the Beginning of the Universe
The cosmological Argument for God states that
1. the universe began to exist
2. everything that begins to exist has a cause
3. Therefore, the universe must have a cause.
This argument has been subject to great applause through the religious community for its simplistic and impactful articulation. However the cosmological argument is also opposed by atheists who fail to find substance and empirical evidence within its core.
In his article, William lane Craig provides his perspective on the Kalam cosmological argument in the Existence of God and the beginning of the universe. Craig …show more content…
So much so that what we currently know of physics and quantum effects may have been drastically different. Therefore we cannot estimate the effects all the way back at “time zero”. And if we could extrapolate back to time zero, it would only establish that the space-time of our universe had a beginning and wouldn’t give us any evidence toward the. Morriston also responds to the illustration of “Hilberts Hotel” claiming that unlike the fictional occupants in the hotel, mathematical objects cannot be “Moved” or occupy different locations, thus rendering the model unfit for application in the universe or “real-life”( …show more content…
Because we have no experience of an infinite and timeless being, how would one deny those attributes in regards to our universe? This is a common theme seen throughout Mackies and Morriston’s work; to claim that there is no “time before time” and if there was “nothing” before the creation of the universe, the universe could not have come into being in the first place thus suggesting that there was always “something”. Just that that something cannot be proven to be God. They believe the arguers in favor of the kalam argument should avoid the topic of something coming into existence out of absolute nothingness as it is a source of