Cosmological Argument

The debate of the existences of God has been going on for centuries, on who is right and who is wrong. Many philosophers have try to argue and debate on who has a clear version of what is true and correct, be it from the religious reasoning or scientific reasoning. The debates for the existences of God have gone through all topic that form the point why we are how we are to the reason that we are here, for this reason philosophers have argue from the very begin. The point when the universe is created.
I. Cosmological Argument
It has lead philosophers to figure out how the universe was created, which lead them to use the cosmological argument, which is the argument of pattern in argumentation (logos) that makes an inference from certain alleged
However, Islamic philosophers enrich the tradition, developing two types of arguments, while the Arabic philosophers developed the temporal argument from contingency. The mutakallimūm, theologians who used reason and argumentation to support their revealed Islamic beliefs, developed the temporal version of the argument from the impossibility of an infinite regress, known as the kalām argument. This is the history of how the cosmological argument came to be and how it has been change to fit more to the liking of some
Hence, a beginning less series of events in time entails the existence of an actually infinite number of things, namely, past events. Craig is explaining that the beginning of the universe having different past event in which caused the creation of the universe. In which gives the infinitive number of past events. While Craig also states that in where it is based on the impossibility of the formation of an actual infinite by successive addition. Though one cannot from an actually collection of things by successively adding one member after another. Since one can always add one more before arriving at infinity, it is impossible to reach actual infinity. Here he tries to explain that event cannot continually add up for the reason that it would be impossible to reach actual infinity. Now someone might say that while an infinite collection cannot formed by beginning at a point and adding members, nevertheless an infinite collection could be formed by never beginning, but ending at a point, that is to say, ending at a point after having added one member after another from eternity. To clear this it would seem that one can one get to infinite, but would first find where it ends to find where it