Preview

Cotton Diplomacy In The United States During The 1860's

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
513 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cotton Diplomacy In The United States During The 1860's
Cotton Diplomacy

During the 1850's, the vast differences between the North and the South brought about the impending notion of war between the two. The South knew that the North had them beat on every level. The North had manufacturing capabilities with factories that could produce supplies necessary for outfitting an army. Also, the North's population of 22 million was nearly three times the population of the South. The South only had nine million people, four million of whom were black slaves. This larger population provided a steady source of military and civilian manpower, and was important in a war of attrition. Lastly, the North grew most of the country's food, and a fighting army can get very hungry. The South had the plantations, but mostly cash crops were grown there.
The South wanted to use their cash crops in order to help them during a war if one ever ensued. They thought of a plan that could help them do just that: The Cotton Diplomacy. This idea was first brought up by a senator from South Carolina, by the name of James Henry Hammond. In an 1858 speech to the Senate, Hammond claimed that "Cotton was King" and the European nations with whom the South sold cotton to would back them up if there ever was a war (Dictionary of American History, 12/2/07).
…show more content…
Southerners believed they could use cotton to lure England and France into recognizing the Confederacy. Although the Confederate Congress never formally approved an embargo, the state governments and private citizens voluntarily withheld the crop from the market in hopes of causing a "cotton famine" overseas. Theoretically, widespread shortages would shut down European mills, forcing governments to recognize and perhaps come to the military aid of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Civil War has been called the first modern war. It depended on railroads, mass-produced weapons, joint army-navy tactics, iron-plated warships, rifled guns and artillery, and trench warfare. The Confederacy had just 9 million people as compared with 22 million in the Union in 1861, and although the Confederacy had only a fraction of the industrial capacity of its opponent, the South was fighting in defense of its own homeland. The North had longer supply lines and the problem of occupying captured areas. It had to commit a greater proportion of its men away from the front than did the South, which could count…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, the south had a great business exporting cotton to England. As the Southern U.S. cotton industries grew, foreign countries began to rely on the South for their cotton supply. The South placed so much emphasis on their cotton’s importance that at the beginning of the Civil War, they trusted cotton as their secret weapon of foreign diplomacy. The Confederate’s relied on the assistance of England. The South held off the exporting of cotton hoping that the English textile mills would get into a financial crisis, so the mills would place pressure on the English government to recognize and support the Confederate government. Using cotton as leverage was an understandable plan. England did depend greatly on the cotton they got from the Southern States. Unfortunately this great strategy did not work. The Confederacy overestimated England’s dependence on their cotton. England bought cotton primarily from the South because it was cheaper. England quickly switched to cotton suppliers from Egypt and India. The South’s plan to rely on King Cotton did not work.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rob Heaney dbq 11 3

    • 890 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the first main issues that required compromise to create a reasonable solution was the enactment of tariffs on the south. The main export of the south was cotton. Cotton was what supplied the south with almost all of its money. In about 1828 to 1833 the first major conflict between the north and south was created during the Tariff or Nullification Crisis. In 1828, the North enacted a tariff on the south that severely affected their cotton trade. The tax rates were as high as forty five to fifty percent. The tariffs were nicknamed the "Tariffs of Abominations" because the south was so disgusted at the high rates it was facing. The south spoke out against these high rates and the north lowered the tariff rates to thirty three percent. Despite lowering the tariff, South Carolina decided that they were not going to follow the tariff, and not pay it. The reasoning the state had was that they thought they should not have to follow any sort of law or tax that was not beneficial to themselves. South Carolina nullified the tariff and didn't pay them. The north was outraged at this act. The north thought that the if South Carolina was able to repeal the tariff and ignore it, who would be able to stop them from ignoring laws regarding slavery? The north and the federal government were offended and angry. An example of their displeasure is shown in Henry Clay's speech to the Senate when he states "I merely throw out these sentiments for the purpose of showing you that South Carolina having…

    • 890 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The American Civil War is known as one of the most devastating wars in American history; however, it is also the time that held one of the most breathtaking feats that could have altered the course of the war: Abraham Lincoln and his policy makers avoiding European intervention in the Civil War, which would have led to a Southern victory. Trade has always been established between the U.S. and European nations with their dependence on cotton; however, this investigation will further enhance how Lincoln and his team were able to influence European nations to not give recognition to the Confederacy throughout…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The South's predominant economic principle before the War of Northern Aggression was "Cotton is King." The South, as it was known around the turn of the 19th century, was solely dependent upon its cotton production. Low prices, unmarketable goods, and over-used land were driving the necessity for slavery and the need for cotton production out. Were it not for a Yankee's ingenuity, the South as we study it now may have been vastly different.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    ironclad

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One of the North's first acts at the outset of the Civil War was the attempt to force the Confederacy into submission by blockading its ports. The objective was to deny the South access to supplies and to shut down its export of cotton to England - its major source of revenue. To counter this threat, the Confederacy began to build a fleet of ships clothed in iron panels that made them impervious to enemy cannon fire. Armed with an underwater ram, these ships were designed to slam into and sink the enemy's wooden vessels.…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Confederates actively sought European support throughout the war. Many Southerners believed that foreign dependence on cotton imports would force world leaders to join the fight against the North. Union leaders wanted to avoid foreign intervention and attempted to make the southern government appear illegitimate.…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War that raged across America from 1861-1865 was the result of a gradual polarization of the nation. Even though the North and the South were part of the same country, the societies, economies, and geography made it so that they were like two different nations. One of the things that shaped every aspect of life was the geography. The fertile soil and warm climate of the South made it ideal to plant crops like tobacco, cotton, rice, and indigo. Because farm work was so profitable to the Southerners, 80 percent of the southern population was working on farms. The northern soil and climate did not favor large plantations. In fact, by 1860, one quarter of all northerners were living in urban areas because that is where the factories and…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compare and contrast economic, social, and political developments in the North and South between 1800-1860. How do you account for the divergence between the two sections?…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    With a shortage of supplies due to lack of industrial bases, the South suffered greatly in the Civil War, ultimately causing their loss. The North’s ability to bring its industry to manufacture supplies allowed it to gain and maintain its dominance over the South. The South, having just 20,000 factories, was no competition for the North, which had 105,000 factories. However, the South at one point did have an opportunity to gain more supplies through foreign aid, which might have caused the Civil War to have a different outcome if the South would have received that aid. Britain and France were willing to give the South money, food, drugs, weapons, and many more supplies. However, the South practiced the institution of slavery, which prevented European aid. Because the middle-classes of France and Britain were against the “peculiar institution”, they chose to side with the North, rather than the South. The South’s deficiency of materials ultimately caused them to lose the Civil War because they were often not prepared for battles and did not have the necessary supplies to compete with the North’s numerous weapons from their large industries.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    At the end, both sides were so angry with the British for not giving it a passionate and rigid support. It is undeniable to point out that the main intention behind the involvement of Great Britain in the American Civil War was economic concerns . Majority of cotton in the world during the mid-nineteenth century was produced in the Southern States in America. After the Southerner's successful secession from the Union, Great Britain had no option but to tread carefully so as not get involved in another war with the USA . The United States issued a global verdict…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This started with the Union’s issue of how to control “King Cotton” . The Confederacy had hoped that Britain and France would play a key part in their economy by exchanging cotton with wartime necessities such as food, weapons, and ammunition. So, before the Union passed by the “Anaconda Plan”, the British had freely traded with both the North and the South (but were mostly interested in cotton from the South), providing both sides with resources. Once the Union passed the “Anaconda Plan”, the British soon declared themselves neutral as to not cause trouble with the Union side. The Confederates attempted to attract the attention of Great Britain and France in the form of the, then, controversial occurrence called the “Trent Affair”.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Civil War Social Effects

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the lead up to the Civil War tensions between the North and the South had risen to extreme levels. This was due to the constant arguments about states rights versus the powers of the federal government, a big factor being slavery. Although, not starting out as a war for freedom, with Abraham Lincoln's election the South felt as though it was an attack on their society as a whole. Four months later a majority of the southern states seceded from the Union creating the Confederacy. However, the Union which was largely industrial had four times as many men as the Confederates supplies by their own materials being able to transport them faster due to the developed railroads.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    They depended greatly on the North for their industries and factories, because they had very few. They also opposed federal spending on internal improvements and they wanted no tariffs. Even despite having a somewhat weak economy, the South wanted to gain their independence to become their own country, and to have their own way of life, which included slavery as legal. When Abraham Lincoln was elected in 1860, the South thought that they would have no voice in the government, considering that Abraham Lincoln was against slavery. In hopes of being their own country, the South had no intention of fighting a war. However, before the war started, the South was unwilling to compromise. They thought that slavery should be allowed in all of the territories. They disagreed to the Missouri Compromise and to parts of the Compromise of 1850. Many felt that these compromises were unfair and biased. The South felt that their way of life and views on slavery were right and just. They turned to what they thought was their only choice: seceding from the Union. This enrage the North, which was one of the main causes of the Civil War.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Did the Northern industrialists want a war to end slavery? No, not to end slavery, but to end the South or, put more accurately, they wanted an end to the Southern power and influence in the Nation. They, or those members of the industrialist clique, who dominated the Republican Party then, were determined to dominate the country by whatever means; but slavery was too profitable for it to be ended until they could "bring off their grandiose plan of domination". There was no way they could have both the profits of slavery and domination of the nation; and domination was far more important. Forcing an end to slavery was the handiest method of destroying the South.…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays