Counterfactual Thinking and Its Effects on Well-Being, Satisfaction, and Self –Efficacy
Abstract
Studies are examined in relation to counterfactual thinking and how it can ultimately have effects on various self-perceptions and emotions. Satisfaction among students and their grades have been linked with counterfactual thinking (consideration of "might-have-been" alternatives to reality). Movement of direction is also considered, specifically when considering rape victims and their thoughts of what they could have done to prevent the outcome, presumably leading to self-blame. Self-Efficacy is addressed in terms of how it has broken the basic rules of effect, and how participants can learn from their mistakes and improve upon the use of counterfactual thinking. The research is mostly conclusive only for this newly emerged branch among self-efficacy research, counterfactual thinking has shown significant affects how we can influence our thoughts on events after the fact that they have occurred, therefore affecting our emotions.
Counterfactual Thinking and its Effect on Well-Being, Satisfaction, and Self–Efficacy
The past can never be changed for any of us, yet we as humans have the cognitive ability to contemplate the “what if” questions of past events. All events seem to trigger after-the-fact thinking, some may be positive and some may be negative. For example, someone who has just gone through a very traumatic event might ask “What would have happened if…” or “I could have been…”, these questions can end in many different ways, but the fact that we ask ourselves these questions implies that cognitive thinking can influence how we perceive the possible outcomes of a situation after the fact. Counterfactual thinking is a process by which we evaluate how we would do things differently, and while it can have a positive spin, more often than not it is a psychological mechanism that causes us to harbor feelings of disappointment and regret. Why is this important to study? This is an important aspect of human cognitive ability that should be
Studies are examined in relation to counterfactual thinking and how it can ultimately have effects on various self-perceptions and emotions. Satisfaction among students and their grades have been linked with counterfactual thinking (consideration of "might-have-been" alternatives to reality). Movement of direction is also considered, specifically when considering rape victims and their thoughts of what they could have done to prevent the outcome, presumably leading to self-blame. Self-Efficacy is addressed in terms of how it has broken the basic rules of effect, and how participants can learn from their mistakes and improve upon the use of counterfactual thinking. The research is mostly conclusive only for this newly emerged branch among self-efficacy research, counterfactual thinking has shown significant affects how we can influence our thoughts on events after the fact that they have occurred, therefore affecting our emotions.
Counterfactual Thinking and its Effect on Well-Being, Satisfaction, and Self–Efficacy
The past can never be changed for any of us, yet we as humans have the cognitive ability to contemplate the “what if” questions of past events. All events seem to trigger after-the-fact thinking, some may be positive and some may be negative. For example, someone who has just gone through a very traumatic event might ask “What would have happened if…” or “I could have been…”, these questions can end in many different ways, but the fact that we ask ourselves these questions implies that cognitive thinking can influence how we perceive the possible outcomes of a situation after the fact. Counterfactual thinking is a process by which we evaluate how we would do things differently, and while it can have a positive spin, more often than not it is a psychological mechanism that causes us to harbor feelings of disappointment and regret. Why is this important to study? This is an important aspect of human cognitive ability that should be
References: Branscombe, N.R., Wohl M.J., Owen S., Allison J.A., & N’gbala, A. (2003). Counterfactual thinking, blame assignment and well-being in rape victims. Basic and Applied Pshychology, 25(4), 265-273 McMullen, M.N. (1997). Affective contrast and assimilation in counterfactual thinking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(1), 77-100. Medvec, V.H., & Satvitsy K. (1997). When doing better means doing worse: The effects of categorical cutoff points on counterfactual thinking and satisfaction. Journal of Pesonality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1284-1296. Roese, N.J. (1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 133-148. Tal-Or, N., Boninger, D.S., Gleicher, F. (2004) On becoming what might have been: Counterfactual thinking and self-efficacy. Self and Identity, 3(1), 5-26.