Preview

Courts Real vs Fiction

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1613 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Courts Real vs Fiction
Reality and Fiction: the True View 1 Reality and Fiction: the True View Americans rely a great deal on their entertainment to educate them about life. In many ways Americans live vicariously through the experiences of fictional characters and believe themselves to learn many things from fictional characters. For example, many persons have said they learned CPR by watching medical shows on television or believe they can assist in a medical emergency because they have seen “experts” on television handle similar situations.
This same belief extends to Americans’ knowledge about the law and the judicial system of the nation. There are many things that fictional accounts of lawyers, judges, and courts confuse or create simply to meet the needs of the fiction or make a specific point. Because the intricacies of the legal profession are not well known or explained in school or by the media, unfortunately, people often only have fictional accounts of the law to educate them. The result, unfortunately, is that the majority of Americans have incorrect beliefs of the law, judges, courts, and the persons that interact with them. One of the main differences between fictional portrayals of the court process and real court processes is how the trial is portrayed. In reality, trials are long, boring procedures where attorneys debate, present evidence, and ask questions that have legal value for the judge or jury to arrive at a decision (CA). Many things are said and many witnesses may be brought in to make statements (CA). Only rarely in that process will anything exciting happen. If one were to believe the portrayal of the trial sequence, however, seems as if every minute is interesting or exciting. Trials presented in movies such as My Cousin Vinny or To Kill a Mockingbird, although one is a comedy and one a drama, represent trials as a place where shocking facts are discovered and quick thinking attorneys make major differences in trial outcomes.
Perry Mason and



References: American Bar Association. (2004). Model Rules of Professional Conduct. Retrieved September 4, 2008, from http://www.abanet.org/cpr/mrpc/preamble.html Gibson, J.L Judicial Counsel of California. (NA). Jury Info: Trial Process. Retrieved September 5, 2008, from http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/jury/step2.htm The Judicial Process at Work Nossiter, A. (1996). Goetz Verdict Clears Injured Son, Mother Says. The New York Times , April 25, 1996. Retrieved September 4, 2008, from http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9804EEDF1639F936A15757C0A960958 260 Pennsylvania Bar Association. (2004). Why Shouldn’t You Try to Handle Your Own Legal Affairs? Retrieved September 5, 2008, from http://www.pabar.org/pdf/howlawyerhelp.pdf Steinberg, H.M

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The American Bar Association developed the Model Rules of Professional Conduct so that American lawyers can know the basic standards of legal ethics and professional responsibility. There are certain rules that would be most important to lawyers, and also for law firms. Rule 1.6 of the model rules involves confidentiality of information, and it is a vital rule to follow when dealing with a client that may-be guilty. Rule 1.9 of the model rules deals with the duties to former clients. Then there is rule 1.16 of the model rules deals with declining or terminating the representation of a client. (American Bar Association, n.d) When it comes to law firms the most important rules of professional conduct would include rule 5.4, rule 5.6, and rule 5.7. Rule 5.4 involves the professional independence of the lawyer. Rule 5.6 deals with the restrictions on the right to practice, and rule 5.7 involves the responsibilities regarding law-related services.…

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sause, Jr., Assistant State’s Attorney for Baltimore City, invited himself and seven other lawyers to attend a very exclusive luncheon at the Merchants’ Club for the purpose of discussing the formation of a “law club.” The seven invitees were F. Hooper Bank, Charles Cahn, II, P. McEvoy Cromwell, Joseph G. Finnerty, Jr., Robert J. Martineau, Shale D. Stiller, and H. Rutherford Turnbull, III. The date of the luncheon was January 12, 1961.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Csi Effect Summary

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Honorable Donald E. Sheldon is a felony trial judge in Ann Arbor, Michigan and a member of the faculty at Eastern Michigan University. In Sheldon’s article, The ‘CSI Effect’: Does it really exist? that was published in the National Institute of Justice, he discusses the craze around the “crime-fiction television dramas” and the possible effects it has on jurors in their decisions in court cases. (Sheldon, par. 3)With the country in complete fascination with crime-fiction Sheldon found television rating from 2006 that showed that “five of the top ten television programs that week were about scientific evidence in criminal cases. Together they amassed more than 100 million viewers.” (Sheldon, Par. 6) With more than 100 million viewers watching crime-fiction in a given week Sheldon wonders “how many of them report for juror duty the next day?”(Sheldon, Par. 7) If the number is significant does it affect how they will judge the outcome in the courtroom?…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Specially, the unequal playing field legal actors and the accused are playing on when it comes to the truths about how they perceive, think and behave. As seen in previous chapters, money and race play a big role in the way individuals are tried, and these wealthy individuals are exploiting the weakness in our legal system. Adam Benforado suggest that this way, “If you are rich and connected, you go free. If you are poor and uneducated, you go to prison.” Will only add to the massive unfairness in our justice system. Accordingly, the use of trial consultants has also proved to be a negative for our justice system. Trial consultants collect information on the potential jury pool, discover any correlations that exist, and then target a sympathetic…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People whom observe the judicial system from afar can come to the conclusion that justice may be “blind”. However, this is not always true. In Rose’s piece of writing, it becomes the duty of twelve jurors to “try and separate the facts from the fancy” (Rose, 5). This means that the jurors would have to decide whether or not a 16-year-old boy was guilty of allegedly stabbing his father to death and committing “murder in the first degree- premeditated homicide” (Rose, 5).…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of 12 Angry Men

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For fans of courtroom dramas and crime television, these court case movies all revolve around the courtroom. Unlike the orderly process of a real courtroom, the stories are filled with drama, intrigue and corruption. Getting to the truth is seldom as straightforward as it appears within these hit movies.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Civil Action Analysis

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Past each families' inevitable touching story, Harr shows readers just how the American judicial system doesn't work. Through the example of this mystifying case it is evident that the system of justice strays away from the truth and rather toward a contradicting system in which either side fights for its self without any interest in the value of its opposition. The interaction between the lawyers and between the lawyers and the judges depicts just how everyone is out to get each other in a seemingly flawed legal system.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Are fiction stories always based on imagination? Or does it come from someone’s reality? Have you ever asked yourself why people read fiction stories? Either told through movies or books, fiction stories are ways people find to escape from their reality. However, most of the fiction stories come from people’s life, or are based in a real fact in order to be credible. In some ways, the truth must be distorted to be understandable, because sometimes it can be too complex to be explained. Both Reading Lolita in Tehran, by Azar Nafisi, and How To Tell a True Story, by Tim O’Brien, attempt to discover the truth even if it was exemplified by fiction, however, the searches were for different environments, gender, circumstances, and purposes.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jury Annotated Bibliography

    • 2432 Words
    • 10 Pages

    "Analysis of the Media 's Influence on the Jury." Justice for America. N.p., 2 Nov. 2007. Web. 2…

    • 2432 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Duke Lacrosse Scandal

    • 3838 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Middleton, M. (1982). Should judges blow the whistle on lawyers? American Bar Association Journal, 68(10), 1207.…

    • 3838 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rose shows that in Twelve Angry Men it is difficult to reach a verdict when jurors essentially have pre conceived ideas and bring personal prejudice in a case, along with Jurors that lack interest. These factors undoubtedly cause conflict and difficulty in the Jury system, which highlights a potential weakness in the democratic process. The trouble also arises from the fact that Juror 8 is one of the few Jurors to initially deliberate honestly and thoughtfully and seeks to obtain justice. Rose suggests that there needs to be active participation In ensuring the jury system operates as intended, and when there is, the final verdict is easier to achieve.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The extent of the problem concerning the wrongfully convictions by jurors seems to lie within several areas. First, once a crime has been committed, the public outcry demands justice; therefore, there is a sense of urgency to quickly resolve the crime. As a result, the system may circumvent some procedures; thereby convicting the wrong individual. Secondly, while the nation has gotten better in the area of race relations, the amount of prejudice has not diminished; therefore, black on white criminal proceedings still affects an enormous amount of the nation’s population as we. Thirdly, the media coverage has an even bigger impact on an individual’s perception of the wrongfully convicted, because most Americans are not afforded the opportunity to be present for the investigative proceedings involved in criminal proceedings. As a result, we tend to rely on the media’s coverage and distorted view points as the main source of information we receive. Fourthly, with the invent of DNA testing some individuals have been released or exonerated through the use of this specialized testing method; however, most individuals cannot afford the amount of legal fees associated therein. Moreover, those individuals that are granted new hearings, or are exonerated using this procedure, have been assisted by groups such as the Innocent Project. Fifthly, the communities from which these individuals were wrongly convicted may still harbor ill feelings regarding their exoneration, which means while the court may exonerate them of all charges, the court of public opinion stills finds them to be guilty (Tyler and Vartkessina, 2012). Finally, even though some individuals have their cases dismissed through legal proceedings within the court system, their records still have to be expunged, which requires the assistance of an attorney, and the fees associated thereof (Roberts, 2003).…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This same belief extends to Americans’ knowledge about the law and the judicial system of the nation. There are many things that fictional accounts of lawyers, judges, and courts confuse, muddle or simply make-up to meet the needs of their fictional account. Because the intricacies of the legal profession are not well known or explained in school or by the media, people often only have these fantastic accounts of the law to educate them to how it works “in the real world”. Consequently, the result is that the majority of Americans have incorrect beliefs of the law, judges, courts, and the persons that comprise our system. One of the main differences between fictional depictions of the court process and real thing is how a trial is portrayed. In reality, trials are long, boring procedures where attorneys debate, present evidence, and ask questions that have legal value for the judge or jury to arrive at a decision. Many things are said and many witnesses may be brought forth to make statements. It is only rarely during these proceedings that anything exciting actually happens. But, if one were to believe the portrayal in movies and on television, it seems as if every minute is interesting or exciting. Trials presented in movies such as “Sleepers” or “To Kill a Mockingbird”, make it seem as if shocking facts are revealed, surprise witnesses are discovered and quick thinking attorneys make major differences in every trial outcome. This simply…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Courts and Law

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On November 16, 2012, I observed a court hearing of 14 cases. Some of these cases dealt with people who committed crimes such as aggravated assault, Acc involving Death/ Injury, Terroristic threats, Retail theft, conspiracy theft, Resist Arrest/Other Law Enforce and Knowing/ in Mftr/Dist of Design Drug.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Reality In T. V Court

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Page

    So lets separate reality from fiction in T.V. court shows or movies. Its expected mas drama and suspense with lots of surprisingly events. In many cases, just like with federal and also in the state level, we don’t usually convict judges, but judges usually are stating, “Over Rule” to an objection or “Sustain.” There is a movie called “The Judge” with great actors from Robert Duval (Joseph Palmer) as the judge from Indiana and Robert Downey Jr. (Hank) is the son a defense attorney while Billy Bob Thornton (Dwight Dickham) is the prosecutor looking to prosecute “The Judge” for first-degree murder. In real life Judges, attorneys, victims and offenders all go through a stage or stages of stress. During the case of “The Judge” Hank is interrogating…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays