Criminal and Civil Court Structures and Legal Personnel
This assignment contains ..............................words
Introduction
This assignment will discuss and compare the court structure, legal personnel and their functions and the type of cases that are brought before criminal and civil courts.
Criminal courts
The criminal court system has many levels of superiority (refer to diagram 1.1 in Appendices). Lower courts are bound by all superior court decisions within the hierarchy. The Magistrates court is the lowest court in the criminal system; they do not create binding precedence and therefore are not bound by their previous decisions (Book1). The Magistrates Court is usually the first point of contact for approximately 97% of all summary offence cases, such as motoring offences, minor assault and low value criminal damage. The maximum fine that the Magistrates can impose is £5000 and/or 6 months imprisonment for a single offence. The Crown Court has much more authority and sentencing powers as they tend to concern themselves with more serious cases, which need a great deal more legal knowledge. The maximum sentence that can be imposed by the Crown Court is life imprisonment and there is no limit to the amount that they can fine an individual/organisation.
The Legal personnel present in the Magistrates court are the lay magistrates. Lay magistrates are appointed by the Lord Chancellor on behalf of the crown. The local advisory committee for the area advises the chancellor on the candidates for magistrates, to enable him to make a decision. Lay people are not paid for the work they do, as the position is on a voluntary basis and they only receive a small loss of earnings allowance and their expenses. Magistrates do not have much, if any legal experience or knowledge. The only criteria they must meet are six qualities that define their suitability (book1). Although they are not legally qualified they are still referred to in court as ‘your worship’ as they hold a position of authority. The Magistrates sit at the front of the Court on a raised Bench to show their authority. The legal advisor is a professionally trained person within the law profession, who resides in the Magistrate’s Court, to advise the lay people on the relevant points of law in accordance with the case. However, the magistrates are not compelled to take the advice of their advisor but as he/she is the only professionally trained body that they have on hand to advise them, the advisors points frequently hold considerable weight.
The court Clerk is present for the majority of the court proceedings in all courts. They sit in front of the judge’s bench (generally next to the legal advisor) and assist the judge by handling the administration of the court operations. They organise all the paper work from both parties of the case, in order to save time and confusion. They can also issue releases and warrants if necessary. The court clerk is usually the only person who may exchange messages and information between the jury and the judge. Occasionally, it may be the job of the court Clerk to handle any video links from outside the court.
The Court Usher generally sits either at the side of the public gallery and close to the main entrance of the court or directly in front of the judges bench. The main role of the Usher is to ensure that the courtroom runs smoothly and efficiently by informing the Clerk of any problems that may arise. The Usher will announce each case to the judge and then call for the defendant to the dock and notify the court of who is representing the defendant (http://www.ukcle.ac.uk/resources/teaching-and-learning-practices/characters/#usher). The Usher swears in the Witnesses and jurors and also performs various administrative tasks through the court proceedings. Whilst the judge is given his judgement the Usher will stand inside the courtroom, in front of the court entrance to prevent anyone from entering. It is also the job of the Usher to ensure all members of the court are hydrated by offering water to them if they need any.
Defendant
A defendant is someone whom court proceedings have been brought against (Oxford, Dictionary of Law). The defendant will sit in court throughout the hearing and trial until a verdict has been reach and sentencing has been passed by the presiding judge or jury. However, they tend to sit in the dock during the court proceedings. If the defendant is required to give evidence, they swear an oath; on their chosen holy book if they are religious or they may just swear on themselves (affirmity) to be an honest person if not. The defendant is always presumed innocent until they are proven guilty; therefore their civil rights still remain in court. However, if the accused fails to attend proceedings without informing the Court before hand, a warrant for their arrest can be issued. (www.directgove.co.uk/CrimeJusticeAndThe Law)
Defence solicitor/barrister
To the left hand side of the front bench, facing the Judge, sits the defence solicitor or barrister in the Court. The main aim of the defence is to persuade the Judge or Jury of the innocence of the defendant, or if admitting guilt, negotiating for their client, by means of presenting supporting evidence, as well as questioning witnesses. The defence solicitor will have often worked with the defendant’s case from the beginning and would act in an advisory capacity, should the case require a barrister. A barrister is appointed by the solicitor and not the defendant, and is usually appointed as a specialist to the relevant case. Barristers are solicitors, who have then undertaken professional training, leading to the Bar examinations, and have became members of the Bar Council. The solicitors and barristers will use citations to make recommendations to the Judge, during trial and sentencing.
Prosecution/claimant
In the criminal court system, the prosecution will be working on behalf of the Crown Prosecution Service, which is the States prosecuting agency. Prior to 1986, the Police would bring criminal proceedings, however this was deemed an unfair system as the Police tended to bring any case to court, even with weak evidence, meaning that a lot of time and money was spent for very little reward. The CPS was given the authority to decide whether proceedings could be brought to the court. The prosecuting Barrister or Solicitor will then sit on the right hand side of the front bench, facing the Judge(s), and it is their responsibility to prove that the defendant has broken the law. The burden is then placed on the Prosecuting Barrister/ Solicitor to prove that the defendant is guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt.
Witness
In court proceedings a witness is a person who gives firsthand evidence about the crime, under oath. They can either verbally give the evidence in court or by video link or they can produce a written statement that is read out in the presence of the judge and jury. If a witness refuses to attend court on the date set, a subpoena can be issued to command that person to attend the trial.
Jury
The jury are a group of lay persons who are selected randomly from the electoral register to attend cases in the Crown Court. Fifteen members of the public are originally selected to attend court and from those 15 people, 12 names are randomly chosen to form the jury for the trial. Anyone over the age of 18, who is on the electoral register and have been a resident of the UK and British Isles for at least five years, are eligible for jury service; although there are exceptions and certain members of the public who may be excused. It is the job of the jury to reach a verdict of guilty or not guilty from the evidence that they are presented with. The leading judge on the case will advise the jurors on the point’s law and summarize the evidence that they must consider in reaching their verdict. The verdict is then announced to the court.
Probation and court welfare services
The probation services are available to give recommendations to the court about the sentencing of a defendant, as they look into the circumstances of the offender. They also give any information to the judge as to whether the defendant has complied with their bail or community service order. The court welfare service also provides recommendations and information for cases involving children or teens under the age of 18. An example of a welfare service is Cafcass, who act independent of the courts, social services and other education and health agencies. They both act as a witness in court and give evidence to assist the judge/jury in the decision.
judge
Press
Security officer/ prisoner guard
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Lay magistrates are useful because they deal with summary offences, which make up 95-97% of all criminal offences. Doing this saves the time of high calibre courts and the judges who operate within them. Additionally costs are kept low as legally qualified district judges need not be used as they charge £52.10-£61.78 an hour. Lay magistrates are much cheaper as they work voluntarily. Magistrates hail from all backgrounds within society and as such different ethnicities and genders can be found within their ranks.…
- 2776 Words
- 12 Pages
Good Essays -
Schmalleger, F. (2009). Criminal Justice Today. An Introductory Text for the 21st Century, (10th ed.). : Pearson Education.…
- 1286 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The role of Magistrates and Jurors are similar in ways of characteristics needed; for example both must be aged 18-70 and those who are in the police or have previous criminal convictions are ruled out. The selection process is however very different, the Lord Chancellor will appoint lay magistrates on behalf of the queen whereas jurors are selected by an electoral register for the area in which the court is situated and is done by a computer at the Central Summoning Bureau. Lay Magistrates are unpaid, part time volunteers whereas jurors are also unpaid but may be unwilling however failure to attend can result in prosecution or a fine. Magistrates can claim a small allowance and compensation for lost earnings. Both parties make their decision based on facts, such as guilt or innocence in trials whereby the difference is that Magistrates can sentence the defendant whereas jurors cannot. Both are used in the right for a ''trial by our peers'', ordinary people with experience of real life situations. Jurors will serve for a period of usually two weeks as apposed to Magistrates who will serve part time for different periods of time. Although lay magistrates and district judges do a very similar job there are many differences between how they work, their qualifications and employment. Lay magistrates, otherwise known as Justice of the Peace sit in magistrate's courts, generally in groups of three, whereas judges usually sit alone. 1999 there were 90, of whom about 20% were women, whereas there are an almost equal number of men and women magistrates, showing that judges are not a mirror image of trial by ones peers such as lay people. Judges are members of the professional judiciary who are legally qualified and salaried, working…
- 790 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The United States has two types of court structures which are called a dual court system. Each of the judicial systems has their separate systems one for each of the states and the other for the Federal system. The U.S. Supreme is the only place where the two judicial systems connect.…
- 272 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
This court deals with mainly criminal cases but rarely civil cases. All criminal cases start off in the Magistrates’ Court and are heard by either lay magistrates or district judges. District judges are legally trained but lay magistrates are not, they do however have to be assisted by a legally trained clerk. Magistrate Courts will only hear cases that have happened in their area and can only administer punishment of up to £5,000 or 6 months imprisonment. If the crime requires more than what the magistrate can administer than the case will be passed on to the Crown Court. Jury can also move up the case to the Crown Court if the defendant asks for trial.…
- 6999 Words
- 28 Pages
Better Essays -
In this task I shall compare and contrast the roles and functions of judges, lawyers and lay people in the English legal courts.…
- 967 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
* The author will determine courtroom groups, how the groups interact daily, and recommend changes to the groups. The author will also describe prosecutor roles and the cases he pursues. Finally, the author will elaborate on the funnel of criminal justice with the backlog among the courtroom group, the court system, give an example, and explain how to eliminate backlog cases.…
- 1190 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Magistrate courts are county courts that hear minor criminal offenses and civil claims involving amounts of $15,000 or less and issue warrants. Magistrate court is the first resort for many civil disputes that may include bad checks, county ordinance violations, landlord/tenant cases, and dispossessories/evictions. In criminal matters magistrates hold preliminary hearings; issue search warrants to law enforcement and also warrants for the arrest of a particular person. No jury trials are held in magistrate court. Rather than by an attorney, civil cases are often argued by the person themselves. The chief magistrate is either elected or appointed in each county. Other magistrates are appointed by the chief magistrate.…
- 1129 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Within the U.S. each state has a court system with a lower court, an appellate court and a Supreme Court that functions similar to the Supreme Court of the U.S. Four levels exist within the State Court: The lower court also known as the court of limited Jurisdiction which represents the first level in which minor cases are seen. Citizens whom are accused of not paying parking fines, those accused of prostitution, DUI and those accused of disorderly conduct in public are also tried in this court.…
- 1224 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Expressing the revulsion people feel for those who commit particularly heinous crimes. Because they are given the task of punishing wrongdoers, courts serve as an agency of social control, determining which behaviors may be acceptable and which deserve severe sanction] (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011, p. 3). Courts play such a critical role simply because they determine what should happen to those who violate the law. There is a criminal court, and there is a civil court. Civil courts deal with private party issues, whereas criminal courts try suspected offenders (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011). In court, cases are handled differently than others. A person who creates a more serious offense will receive more harsh consequences in court as compared to a person who faces a less serious crime.…
- 745 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
There are two main courts - Magistrates and Crown Court. Magistrates have less power than Crown. magistrates can sentence up to six months in custody. Crown Courts can sentence longer up to life in prison. An indictable offence is one tried by a jury in the Crown court. When a magistrates court feels that the offence is so serious they cannot sentence accordingly i/e give a harsher punishment, as the crime deserves in the public interest, or is clearly so serious such as rape or murder, they pass it to the Crown court "indictment".…
- 450 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The modern dual system of courts incorporates both federal and state or local courts. This system is the product of many years of gradual development. Outside this formally established structure, however, personal relationships between key court participants can guide court proceedings and procedures. This paper will examine the history of the criminal courts, the dual system of the United States and modify the difference between the historical development and the dual court system of the United States.…
- 953 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
1. Describe the role of the courts in the Criminal Justice Process: (300 – 400 Words)…
- 3916 Words
- 13 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Laws are put in place to keep the community safe from harm and if those laws are broken actions are taken to punish the offender. The criminal justice system is made up of three components law enforcement, courts, and corrections. These three components work together to apprehend criminals, determine whether or not he or she are guilty, and if guilty to punish them for their criminal actions.…
- 523 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
During the next few paragraphs we will discuss the components of the criminal justice system and the criminal justice process. We will also discuss the definition of crime and its relationship to the law. Finally we will discuss the government structure as it applies to the criminal justice system.…
- 1152 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays