Preview

Criminal Defense Case Analysis Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
862 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Criminal Defense Case Analysis Paper
Criminal Defense Case Analysis Page 1

Tina Palacios

University of Phoenix

CJA343

Criminal Defense Case Analysis Page 2 I know when we think of the court room we think about how we see it on television although television does not give us the full details some shows come pretty close. When I watch court TV I can see the reality in the courtrrom and feel the pression of the witness on the stand or the defendant trying to defend himslfe against the lawyer that is grilling him. Through all the court mumbo jumbo there are rules and different ways a person can get off and go scott free and there are ways that they can got to prison for a lot of years
…show more content…

Factual states “I did not do it” and most of the defendants will use this to avoid their punishment by saying they did not commit the crime in question. Legal defense states “I did do it… but”, this category consists of two small groups and they are justification and excuse. In this defense both catagories each have several small groups with n themselves. Justification is when a dendant believes he committed a crime to avoid less harm to themselves. The first group in the justification category is necessity defense and this is when a defendant claims they commited the crime to avoid a greater harm that could have be done to the defendant or a third party. Self defense is when the defendant shows the court that someone try to do harm to them whether it was very bad or could have resulted in death so therfore they had to use the same force for their protection. Defense of others is when an individual witnesses someone else being victimized to point where it could result in death. The defense of one’s home …show more content…

Durress is when a defendant is coerced or froced to commit a crime to protect themselves or a third party. There are two forms of intoxication and they are voluntary and involuntary intoxication. Voluntary intoxication is when aperson knowingly drinks and gets into a car and involuntary is when a person unknowingly consumes an illegal drug and it makes them helpless. The defense mistake is when a person misunderstands or forgets certain facts about that relate to a certain situation. The age defnse is when a child under the age of seven can not be liable for committing a crime because it is said that they can not commit an act of violence. In some states the age is seventeen when a they can be charged as an adult for committing a crime. The entrapment defense is when a person must prove that they were coerced by the police or some type of governemnt into commiting an illegal act that may have never happened. The last defense is syndrome based and this is aimed towrads battered women,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In this paper I am going to take a look at the case state of Maryland v Alonzo King. I will take a look at what accomplice liability is and criminal liability and how they are related to the case of Maryland v King. How different aspects of crime differ from one another and there direct correlation to this case.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Officer Jane Roberts got pregnant by the FTO, Andrew Tibbets. The FTO is not willing to leave his wife and now will not have anything to do with Officer Jane Roberts. There was a confrontation and Sergeant Williams witnessed it but never mentioned it to either one of them, thinking that they could take care of it themselves. Well, since the FTO now wants nothing to do with Officer Roberts, she went to Sergeant Williams to let him know what was going on between the two of them. She told him that she was pregnant and that the baby was Officer Tibbets. The Sergeant informed her that she would have…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sutherland, M. (2005). Judicial Tyranny: The New Kings of America. St. Louis, MO: The National Policy Center. ISBN: 9780975345566…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper will locate two cases that discuss various types of criminal defenses. The two choices are: (1) The Jeffrey Dahmer Case, and (2) State v. Fisher Involuntary Manslaughter Case. The two cases analysis in which this paper identifies and examines the types of criminal defenses that were used. This paper will also explain the nature and types of defenses used in the cases and what evidence was used to demonstrate the defense. This paper will describe how justification and excuse play a role in the cases. This paper will also describe the outcome of each case.…

    • 2165 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cj227 Unit 4 Project

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Since John was in custody, what are the procedural steps the police were required to take once John began to incriminate himself? The police have no obligation to stop John Doe from making any statements. “Excited Utterance” made by a defendant before being questioned are admissible as statements given under Miranda advisement. Once the police begin to question John Doe regarding the theft, then they are required to read or provide Mr. Doe with his Miranda Warnings. Miranda rights (Miranda rule, Miranda warning) n. the requirement set by the U. S. Supreme Court in Miranda v. Alabama (1966) that prior to the time of arrest and any interrogation of a person suspected of a crime, he/she must be told that he/she has: "the right to remain silent, the right to legal counsel, and the right to be told that anything he/she says can be used in court against" him/her. Further, if the accused person confesses to the authorities, the prosecution must prove to the judge that the defendant was informed of them and knowingly waived those rights, before the confession can be introduced in the defendant's criminal trial. The warnings are known as "Miranda Rights" or just "rights." The Miranda rule supposedly prevents self-incrimination in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the U. S. Constitution. Sometimes there is a question of admissibility of answers to questions made by the defendant before he/she was considered a prime suspect, raising a factual issue as to what is a prime suspect and when does a person become such a suspect?…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The criminal justice system has within it a set of rules, regulations and guidelines, known as criminal laws which are based on various sources, some dating back to England. Criminal law also has a purpose for which it was designed. Criminal laws have jurisdiction which keeps it structured and in order. Within criminal law are various offenses for which there must be standards of proof. Criminal law addresses liabilities as well, such as criminal liability and accomplice liability. In addition there are various types of offenses, one set of offenses known as inchoate offenses, which will be discussed and compared with other types of criminal offenses here.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal justice is a profession that is widely known around the world. Many people dream about pursuing a career in the law enforcement field. The law enforcement field like any other profession has its own terminology, to be effective as a police officer, lawyer, or detective a person must have a good general knowledge of the law enforcement field terminology. This paper will explain and define some law enforcement terms such as Pseudospeciation, social constructions, bigotry, racism, hegemony, disparity, and discrimination.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Someone can be affected by their surroundings, whether it is the community, they live in or peer pressure. In addition, someone’s genetics can have an influence on his or her behaviors. That person could suffer from a mental illness that causes irrational behaviors. There are also the individuals that just want to do it on their own free will (Schmalleger, 2011, p.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 7 Assignment

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Schmalleger, F. (2006). Criminal law today: An introduction with capstone cases. (3rd Ed.). Prentice Hall.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A crime is which one breaks the law, meaning an individual or a group partakes in an event to do something wrong and one is accused in which a crime was committed. A crime (1981-2005), according to The Free Dictionary is defined as “A violation of a law in which there is injury to the public or a member of the public and a term in jail or prison, and/or a fine as possible penalties. There is some sentiment for excluding from the "crime" category crimes…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Defense Analysis

    • 881 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Justification Defense, the courts require that the prosecutor prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of a crime, the defense can take an offensive role in their trial by taking an affirmative defense. Instead of sitting back and waiting for the prosecuting attorney to attempt to prove the defendant’s guilt, the defendant can fight back with defenses.…

    • 881 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ). The sources of US Law are important because they secure our general wellbeing, and guarantee our rights as natives against misuse by other individuals, by associations, and by the administration itself. We have laws to accommodate our general wellbeing. These exist at the neighborhood, state and national levels, and incorporate things such as laws that originate from the Bill of Rights in the U.S. Constitution, that ensure our fundamental opportunities like the right to speak freely, religion, and the press. Laws that shield us from segregation in light of our race, sex, age, or due to an incapacity. In the United States, the Constitution is a definitive wellspring of the law. Be that as it may, it was never intended to address each particular…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prosecuting Arguments

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The prosecution must establish the facts and elements of each crime to prove a defendant's guilt. The elements of crime are the basic components of the crime, and the essential features of that crime specified by law or statute. These elements include actus reus, mens rea, and a concurrence of the two. To convict the defendant of a particular crime, the prosecution must establish that each of the required elements are present in the facts to prove criminal liability (Schmalleger, Hall, & Dolatowski, 2010). In the case of State v. Stu Dents, the prosecution must establish the facts and elements of the charges for homicide, assault of a police officer, kidnapping, burglary, and crimes related to drugs.…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Then, self-defense when an individual defending his or her life or physical well-being can use whatever force is rea¬son¬ably necessary to prevent harmful contact. “Whatever force is reasonably necessary” is whatever force the in¬dividual believes is about to be used against him or her. Force cannot be used once danger has passed and cannot be used in revenge. Defense of others when an individual can act to defend others who are in danger to the same extent that he or she can act in self-protection. Defense of property when defend property, individuals can use reasonable force—which does not include force that is likely to cause death or great bodily…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fred is drunk and driving his dad’s car. Fred is a 21 year old student at Columbia College. Fred rams into a parked car at 10th and Rogers. Thinking no one saw him; Fred moves his car and parks it on an adjacent lot. He sprints to his dorm room in Miller Hall. A neighbor saw the wreck and Fred running to the dorm. Police are called and they arrive ten minutes after the wreck. The officers see several empty beer cans and a bottle of tequila (half full) in the front seat. The tags are traced to Fred’s dad, who is called by police. Dad says that Fred is a student at Columbia College. Police run Fred's record and determine that he has two prior DWIs within the past five years. The third DWI in 10 years is a felony. Police contact Columbia College security who leads them to Fred’s dorm. Fred is passed out, so security lets them in. The officers smell intoxicants, give Fred some Field Sobriety tests (he fails) and confirm that he was driving the car. Fred is arrested for DWI. It is his third offense, a felony under Missouri law. Fred is given a breath test, which registers at .13 on the scale. During the processing of his arrest paperwork, the officers search Fred’s possessions which he brought to the station, and a small quantity of cocaine is found in Fred’s pocket. Fred is charged with DWI, leaving the scene, and possession of cocaine. What issues do you see? How should they be resolved? (50 points)…

    • 6313 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Better Essays