Preview

Criminal Justice System

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2309 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Criminal Justice System
The Criminal Justice System of UK

Law of United Kingdom

#The United Kingdom has three legal systems. English law, which applies in England and Wales, and Northern Ireland law, which applies in Northern Ireland, are based on common-law principles. Scots law, which applies in Scotland, is a pluralistic system based on civil-law principles, with common law elements dating back to the High Middle Ages.
The Treaty of Union, put into effect by the Acts of Union in 1707, guaranteed the continued existence of a separate law system for Scotland. The Acts of Union between Great Britain and Ireland in 1800 contained no equivalent provision but preserved the principle of separate courts to be held in Ireland, now Northern Ireland
The Appellate
…show more content…

An appeal may also be made to the High Court if the High Court itself heard the case at first instance. Two judges sit to hear an appeal against sentence, and three judges sit to hear an appeal against conviction.
There is no further appeal from the High Court's decision on appeal, in contrast to the Court of Session, from which it is possible to appeal to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, the highest court. Appeals under the Human Rights Act 1998 and devolution appeals under the Scotland Act 1998 are heard by the UK Supreme Court (formerly the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.
Sheriff Court
The #Sheriff Court is the main criminal court; this sits locally. The procedure followed may either be solemn, where the Sheriff sits with a jury of 15; or summary, where the Sheriff sits alone. From 10 December 2007, the maximum penalty that may be imposed in summary cases is 12 months' imprisonment or a £10,000 fine, in solemn cases 5 years' imprisonment or an unlimited fine .
A higher sentence in solemn cases may be imposed upon reference to the High Court of Justiciary.
District


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Pre-Trial Conference 10. Service of Process 11. Summons 12. Verdict 13. Voir Dire Dean’s List #3 – Trial Procedures…

    • 18216 Words
    • 73 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legt 1710 Assignment 1

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The court of appeal operates within appellate jurisdiction. It has the legal power to alter previous decision of the lower courts.…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The English administrative court is very unlikely to interfere with a coroner’s decision unless it can be challenged on these grounds: illegality, irrationality and proportionality, and procedural impropriety. On the 6th of April 1993 the high court granted leave to six families of the Hillsborough disaster to apply for a judicial review. The grounds of their appeal include: insufficiency of inquiry, the irregularity of proceedings and the emergence of new facts or evidence. LJ McCowan rejected the submission on the 5th of November, ruling that the inquests had been properly conducted and there had been no suppression of evidence . Therefore ruling that it “was not a case on which it would be right to order fresh inquests. In addition, even though there has been cases such as R v North London coroners and R v Avon coroners , whereby the court found that the coroner had misdirected the jury, the court refused to quash the original verdicts and order fresh inquests, as the court saw no benefits in doing so. This indicates how high the threshold for a judicial review…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The work of lay magistrates includes hearing applications for bail (bail act 1976) and for legal aid. Magistrates also sit in benches of three and hear all summary offences and the majority of either-way offences as a court of first instance, that’s over 96% of all criminal cases. The majority of either-way offenders opt for a magistrates hearing as they hope for a shorter sentence because the magistrates sentencing powers are limited to 6 months imprisonment or 12months for 2 offences, and a maximum fine of £5000.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Unit 23

    • 6999 Words
    • 28 Pages

    This court deals with mainly criminal cases but rarely civil cases. All criminal cases start off in the Magistrates’ Court and are heard by either lay magistrates or district judges. District judges are legally trained but lay magistrates are not, they do however have to be assisted by a legally trained clerk. Magistrate Courts will only hear cases that have happened in their area and can only administer punishment of up to £5,000 or 6 months imprisonment. If the crime requires more than what the magistrate can administer than the case will be passed on to the Crown Court. Jury can also move up the case to the Crown Court if the defendant asks for trial.…

    • 6999 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theoretically it is still possible for some appeals to be taken under Section 74 of the Constitution however the Australia Act 1986 (Cwth) provides for the High Court of Australia being the final court of appeal in the Australian judicial…

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    An Appellate court and lower courts are two completely different things. However, they do have their similarities. They both are court trails and ways to go about proving a person right or wrong. In a Appellate court, normally the victim has done something very wrong and they normally do not get the chance to even begin to share their side of the story of what they think happened vs. what really may have happened. Court judges believe that the outcome of the trial should have been different, but if no errors were made, they will not overrule the lower court. The judges make their decisions based only on arguments of how the law should be and interpreted .…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appeals court “appellate court” has the final verdict for the state. The judgment in this court are final, one cannot appeal the case unless it engaged in any federal laws or legitimate procedures.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Justice 101

    • 2648 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The court of appeals is where you would go after the district court if you are looking to appeal a conviction. The court of appeals judges ordinarily do not conduct trials. They decide an appealed case by reading the trial and written briefs filed by the parties, and hearing arguments by the lawyers. They research and review the law involved in the case and then write an opinion.…

    • 2648 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The courts involved in this case was the NSW supreme court as this court has original criminal jurisdiction to murder, manslaughter and attempted murder which is relevant to this case. Regardless of the Supreme Court having authority to hear matters from lower courts, there was no appeal from lower courts as this case was taken directly to NSW supreme court.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Report

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The basic division in the structure of criminal courts is between the lower criminal courts – the local courts, Children’s court and Coroner’s court – and the higher criminal courts – the District Court and the Supreme Court. In observing proceedings at the Local, District and Supreme Courts over a period of three days a number of aspects of the criminal justice system were made apparent. The administration, processes and practices of the criminal trial are extremely varied dependent upon the level of criminal court being observed. The distinctions between the workings of the two courts revealed a number of the differences between summary proceedings and trial upon indictment. The cases observed served to provide evidence for the “two tiers of justice” argument. Also the role of the judiciary was perceived as being particularly interesting especially the high level of discretion that they held in the Local Courts and even to an extent in the District Court primarily when there was no jury present.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    new trial or refer the matter to the Court of Appeal. The Minister is not responsible for deciding…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The criminal justice system is a set of legal and social institutions for enforcing the criminal law in accordance with a defined set of procedural rules and limitations. In the United States, there are separate federal, state, and military criminal justice systems; each state has separate systems for adults and juveniles.…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The criminal justice system in England and Wales is formulated on the basis of some basic aims and targets. The main target of this system is to reduce the prevalence of crime and ensure the speedy trial of the culprits. The main steps involved in the criminal justice system include the policing, court trial and corrections (Davies, Croall and Tyrer 2005). The initial investigation and collection of evidence is carried out by police. After that, the suspect is presented in the court for trial and the adequate sentence and punishment is finalized. Correction involves the participation of culprits in different activities according to the terms and conditions of the punishment.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Malaysian Court System

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages

    THE SUPERIOR COURTS This consists of the High Court of Malaya, the High Court of Sabah & Sarawak, the Court of Appeal and the Federal Court. The Federal Court is the highest court of the land. High CourtsThe High Courts have general supervisory and revisionary jurisdiction over all the Subordinate Courts and hear appeals from the Subordinate Courts in civil and criminal matters. They hear matters relating to the validity or dissolution of marriage (divorce) and matrimonial causes, bankruptcy and companies winding up matters, guardianship or custody of children, grants probates of wills and letters of administration of deceased persons, injunctions, specific performance or rescissions of contracts, legitimacy of any persons and generally actions of which the claim exceeds RM250,000-00 (except motor vehicle accidents, landlord and tenant and distress). The High Courts have powers to hear all criminal matters. Court of AppealGenerally, the Court of Appeal hears all civil appeals against decisions of the High Courts except where against judgment or orders made by consent. In cases where the claim is less than RM250,000-00 or the judgment or order relates to costs only or against decisions of a judge in chambers on an interpleader summons on undisputed facts, leave of the Court of Appeal must first be obtained. The Court of Appeal also hears criminal appeals against decisions of the High Courts. Federal CourtAll civil appeals from the Court of Appeal are heard by the Federal Court only after leave is granted by the Federal Court. The Federal Court also hears criminal appeals from the Court of Appeal only in respect of matters heard by the High Court in its original jurisdiction. THE SUBORDINATE COURTS This consists of the Sessions Courts, the Magistrates' Courts and in West Malaysia the Penghulu's Courts. Penghulu's CourtsGenerally, the Penghulu's Courts hear civil matters of…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays