Preview

Malaysian Court System

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
640 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Malaysian Court System
The Malaysian Bar

Malaysian Court System
Last Updated Monday, 29 September 2008 04:37PM

THE SUPERIOR COURTS This consists of the High Court of Malaya, the High Court of Sabah & Sarawak, the Court of Appeal and the Federal Court. The Federal Court is the highest court of the land. High CourtsThe High Courts have general supervisory and revisionary jurisdiction over all the Subordinate Courts and hear appeals from the Subordinate Courts in civil and criminal matters. They hear matters relating to the validity or dissolution of marriage (divorce) and matrimonial causes, bankruptcy and companies winding up matters, guardianship or custody of children, grants probates of wills and letters of administration of deceased persons, injunctions, specific performance or rescissions of contracts, legitimacy of any persons and generally actions of which the claim exceeds RM250,000-00 (except motor vehicle accidents, landlord and tenant and distress). The High Courts have powers to hear all criminal matters. Court of AppealGenerally, the Court of Appeal hears all civil appeals against decisions of the High Courts except where against judgment or orders made by consent. In cases where the claim is less than RM250,000-00 or the judgment or order relates to costs only or against decisions of a judge in chambers on an interpleader summons on undisputed facts, leave of the Court of Appeal must first be obtained. The Court of Appeal also hears criminal appeals against decisions of the High Courts. Federal CourtAll civil appeals from the Court of Appeal are heard by the Federal Court only after leave is granted by the Federal Court. The Federal Court also hears criminal appeals from the Court of Appeal only in respect of matters heard by the High Court in its original jurisdiction. THE SUBORDINATE COURTS This consists of the Sessions Courts, the Magistrates' Courts and in West Malaysia the Penghulu's Courts. Penghulu's CourtsGenerally, the Penghulu's Courts hear civil matters of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Question Two: The Magistrates’ Court is the lowest court in the Victorian Court hierarchy. It has the ability to hear up to $100,000 for all civil disputes including personal injury. All disputes that are under $10,000 go to arbitration. In its criminal division, the Magistrates’ Court can hear summary offences such as minor assault and careless driving, indictable offences heard summarily, committal proceedings, bail applications and warrant issues. The Magistrates Court has no appellate jurisdiction.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Appellate court is where appeals are first heard. This court was established to help reduce the backlog of cases waiting to be heard by The Supreme Court, also referred to the court of last resort, is the highest level of court within a State. The Appellate Courts rule on if there are grounds for another hearing or if rights have been violated moving that case to the next phase, The State Supreme Court. One of the biggest factors that distinguishes this high court from the lower courts is the “amount of control these judicial bodies exercise over their dockets” (Neubauer & Fradella, 2011). Not every case that is sent to the Court of Last Resort will be heard.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Australian and Indonesian legal systems are very different. Indonesia is less successful than Australia when it comes to uphold human rights. One of the key to a successful legal system is respecting human rights, such as the right to life, the freedom of speech and thoughts and the fact that everyone was born free and equal. Another important key is making sure that the community is being protected at all times.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Australian Court Hierarchy

    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The term "Court Hierarchy" is a very important word in the law world in modern society. It's definition gives a very clear and concise meaning to the law industry. The phrase can be split into two words to be easily dealt and understood. The word "court" is from a Greek derivative "cohors" or "cohort" meaning courtyard or retinue. It's definition from the dictionary certainly portrays the law as a very important and distinguished practice. "a. A person or body of persons whose task is to hear and submit a decision on cases at law." "b. The building, hall, or room in which such cases are heard and determined." The word, "hierarchy", however, has a more powerful and specific relation to the law world. It is a Greek derived word and originally came from the word "hierarkhia", meaning the rule of a high priest. "a. A body of clergy organized into successive ranks or grades with each level subordinate to the one above." "b. A series in which each element is graded or ranked." By placing these two words together, it has a responsibility of giving the public a definition of one of the most important practices portrayed by the Court System of Australia. Court Hierarchy is the term given to the system in which the Courts of Australia are split into different levels to deal with different matters by different levels of severity.…

    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judiciary Process

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    himself because he’s mad at his son for what he did but still loves him.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Systems

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This paper is about a court case, different types of federal and state courts, and new technology used in court cases.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court Systems

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The modern dual system of courts incorporates both federal and state or local courts. This system is the product of many years of gradual development. Outside this formally established structure, however, personal relationships between key court participants can guide court proceedings and procedures. This paper will examine the history of the criminal courts, the dual system of the United States and modify the difference between the historical development and the dual court system of the United States.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Criminal Trial Process

    • 3916 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Each court has its own jurisdiction or area over which it has authority to hear matters. Minor matters such as summary offences are dealt with lower in the court hierarchy; the higher courts are reserved for more serious matters, indictable offences and appeals from the lower courts.…

    • 3916 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Systems

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The U.S. Constitution is supported by a dual court system in which the power is shared between the state and the federal governments. Most criminal cases are tried in state court, whereas, federal crimes are tried in federal courts. Both courts have jurisdiction, although federal courts are limited to the cases heard. The state offers a broad capability to encompass more cases and averages 30,000,000 cases filed, whereas, the federal courts see a mere 1,000,000 cases (findlaw). State and federal governments are mutual partners in the objective to protect the rights of citizens and the Constitution.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    High Court In Australia

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Page

    The High Court of Australia was established by the Federal Government and the Commonwealth Parliament delegate’s power to the Judiciary Act 1903. The High Court is evidently the highest court, most superior and final court of appeal in Australia. Section 73 outlines the role of the High Court; appeals from all other superior federal and state courts, in all branches of law, except federal constitutional law. In other words the High Court hears appeals and applies the constitution when relevant to sole disputes. When no other avenue is present the High Court can establish case law to solve an outcome in a case. Case law is then develops into a binding precedent, which means all other courts in Australia (all below courts) must follow this new…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Matters that involve federal law along with original small cases are heard by the supreme court and is the translator of federal constitutional law. The United States Courts of Appeals is the appellate court of the federal court system. The court of appeals makes decision on cases which are from the district and its circuit federal judiciary and from other selected federal courts. The United States District Courts are the trail courts of the federal court system. It deals both with the criminal and civil cases within the courts.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The next court below in the hierarchy is the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), they are bound by the past decisions of the Supreme Court/House of Lords and its own past decisions. Both Supreme Court and Court of…

    • 3885 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are two courts on the higher level. The High court which deals with cases pertaining to civil matter of unlimited value and the Crown court which deals with serious criminal offences. The High court has four sections: the Chancery division which deals with matters pertaining to equity, the Family division which deals with family matters, the Queen's Bench division which deals with civil matters and the…

    • 1722 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    6. Marks will be deducted for late submission. Your date of submission is on or before 20th May 2013.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before this assignment, I never even knew where Philippine court was or how it looked like. I had this image of a large colonial building with an imposing facade, smartly dressed lawyers racing to their destinations and the gripping tension as the fate of human lives hung in the balance. It was, quite embarrassingly in retrospect, the romantic Hollywood view in my head.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays