Preview

Criminal Law Assignment

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2754 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Criminal Law Assignment
Assignment Question:

A person who is charged with a criminal offence enjoys certain rights. The principle right is that of the right to silence and the right not to incriminate yourself. The right to silence is an immunity, which differs in nature, origin, incidence and importance. The suspect’s immunity was developed in order to avoid the risk of untrue confessions being obtained from a person in police custody. The law does not prohibit a suspect from confessing to a crime. It does however provide that a suspect should be free to remain silent should he so choose and that he should be informed of his right to do so.

Analyze with reference to relevant case law.

Answer:

Introduction:

When the police arrest a person, they should recite to him the Miranda warning. The Miranda warning or as also known as the Miranda rights mentions some of the rights that an arrested person enjoys. Such rights are the right to silence and the right to speak to an attorney. If these rights were not mentioned to the arrested person, then any of the confessions that he might have made may be excluded in their prosecution as evidence. We will look in this assignment at the Miranda rights and in particular looking at the right to silence and the right not to incriminate yourself. And we will look at some of the cases that are related to this topic.

What is the right to silence?

The right to silence is used by persons in Garda custody for a criminal offence. Where they can refuse to answer any of the questions made to them by the Garda.

The right to silence is not only a common law but it is also one of the constitutional rights. The right to silence is mentioned in Bunreacht na hEireann, or the Irish constitution in Article 38.1.

In some cases however, the legislation began to require answers to some questions in specific circumstances.

This was seen in the case of Heaney v. Ireland . Here the defendants were required to give a full account of their movements



Bibliography: • Cecilia Ni Choileain, Criminal Law, (Round Hall Nutshells, Thomson Round Hall, Dublin 2006) • Peter Charleton, P.A McDermott and M • T.J McIntyre and Sinead McMullan, Criminal Law, (Essential Law Texts, Sweet and Maxwell, London 2001) • Vicky Conway, Yvonne Daly and Jennifer Schweppe, Irish Criminal Justice, (Clarus Press Ltd, Dublin 2010) • T.J McIntyre and Sinead McMullan, Criminal Law, (Essential Law Texts, 2nd Ed, Sweet and Maxwell, London 2005) • Fergus W Articles: • Siun Leonowicz “The Privilege against self incrimination” (2005) 23 ILT 77 • “The Right to Silence” (1991) 9 ILT 269 Other Sources

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    References: Schmalleger, F., Hall, D. E., & Dolatowski, J. J. (2010). Criminal Law Today: An introduction with…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Miranda Warning is intended to protect the guilty as well as the innocent and should be protected at all costs. Without the law, many suspects may be treated unfairly. It is a necessary safeguard. Its intentions were to give suspects an informed choice between their freedom of speech, their right not to speak, but be silent, and the prevent statements being given in a non-voluntary nature. Since the law was imposed police policies and procedures were promoted and enforced that effectively imposed safeguards throughout law enforcement agencies. However, with any law there is also discourse. In this essay I plan to give a brief summary of Miranda and discuss the advantages and disadvantages that Miranda provides for suspects and law enforcement officials.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Albanese, J. S. (2013). Criminal Justice (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.…

    • 1665 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs Arizona

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages

    2. Schmallager, F. (2011). Criminal justice today: An introductory text for the 21st century (11th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ. Pearson/Prentice Hall Retrieved 4/17/2013…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Miranda warning (often abbreviated to "Miranda," or "Mirandizing" a suspect) is the name of the formal warning that is required to be given by police in the United States to criminal suspects in police custody (or in a custodial situation) before they are interrogated, in accordance with the Miranda ruling. Its purpose is to ensure the accused are aware of, and reminded of, these rights under the U.S. Constitution, and that they know they can invoke them at any time during the interview.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federal Law on Homicide

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thomas, A., & Chamelin, N. (2009). Essentials of Criminal Law Tenth Edition. In A. Thomas, & N. Chamelin, Essentials of Criminal Law Tenth Edition (p. 135). Columbus, Ohio: Prentice Hall.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court History and Purpose

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Schmalleger, F., Hall, D. E., & Dolatowski, J. J. (2010). Criminal Law Today. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miranda Decision Case

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Miranda decision emerges from a case back in 1966 which deals with the rights of the accused, mainly with the Fifth Amendment right to not incriminate one’s self(Leo,1996).In this case Ernest Miranda,, a Mexican-American, was facing the state of Arizona for raping and kidnapping an eighteen year old woman.The case led to the Miranda warning which requires the officer to notify a suspect of his rights,i.e. you have the right to remain silent,and the right to speak to an attorney(Leo,1996). That the questions answered by Miranda during his interrogation must have been answered with the defendant’s knowledge of his rights.This made a big impact in the police force, that a testimony is only legitimate if the proper steps are carried out(Leo,1996).…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is important for the police to read you your Miranda Rights because, if they don’t read your rights when you are being questioned, anything you say can’t be held against you. If they don’t read your rights, and you come clean about everything it won’t matter. You could be in court on trial telling them everything, but if they didn’t read your rights they have to let you go. It is also very important for people to hear their rights, so that they know they don't have to talk if they do not wish to; and that they will be provided an attorney if needed.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda Warnings

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As mentioned before, Prosecutors only need a confession to prosecute, so informing a person of their right to remain silent and their right to an Attorney makes Law Enforcement Officials need more than a confession. Needing more than confession keeps the suspect innocent until the police or other Law Enforcement Agencies find something to prove them…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 3

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages

    References: Criminal Law Today, Fourth Edition, by Frank Schmalleger, Ph.D. and Daniel E. Hall, J.D., ED.D. with John J. Dolatowski, J.D.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Davenport, Anniken (2009). Basic Criminal Law, The Constitution, Procedure, and Crimes (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Miranda Decision

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 1966, the U.S. Supreme Court made a landmark ruling in the case of Miranda v. Arizona that established that a suspect has the right to remain silent and that prosecutors may not use statements made by defendants while in police custody unless the police have advised them of their rights.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Schmalleger,F (2011) Criminal justice today an introduction text for the 21st century (11th ed)…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Criminal Law

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Schmalleger, F. (2010). Criminal law today: An introduction with capstone cases (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays