Preview

Critically assess the sociological theory of Jurgen Habermas.

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1354 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Critically assess the sociological theory of Jurgen Habermas.
Habermas is considered one of the most influential academics in the domain of Sociology and Philosophy (Gerry 1991: 345). He has had much influence and success in coherence with the Frankfurt School and Neo-Marxism. Despite the institute loosing some of it’s influence, Jurgen Habermas modernised the theory, and his influential discussion of democracy went alongside the democratic movements of the last century (holbergprisen 2013). In order to adequately evaluate the extent to which Habermas’ theory contributed to not only the field of Sociology but the world in which it aims to study. It is important to emphasise how much his theory can be applied to contemporary society, and how much of a future the man and his works has.

The Frankfurt School

Jurgen Habermas is often associated with the Frankfurt School and it’s ideologies. He is seen as being influenced by Marx, however, in relation to rational thought. The school adopted the theory that society should no longer be dominated by the system of state capitalism. With inclinations towards the need for society to take a critical approach to current the western europe’s democratic institutions. Therefore, society has a duty to impose a revolutionised system that would in turn free citizens from their self-imposed state of ‘alienation’ that arises from the restraints of the capitalist structure. This illustrates first hand how influential Habermas was because he was part one of the most influential institutions there has ever been. The institution has not only modernised and analysed the works of Karl Marx, arguably one of the most controversial thinkers. It is also one which attempts to change society for the better, and engage it’s audience it alternative critical theory (McCarthy 1978: 119).

Habermas’ expansion on Marx’s theories could be considered a great triumph. This is because if the study of society is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The author Terrell Carver assesses the Marx’s social theory in his book (Marx’s Social Theory). This is a fascinating account of Terrell Carver about Marx’s social theory. Writer discusses the influence of Marx on almost every discipline of knowledge from aesthetics to theology, including anthropology, geography, jurisprudence, and history, almost all branches of philosophy, political science and psychology.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The motivation behind this paper will be to explore Horkheimer and Adorno's evaluation of the enlightenment and Habermas' retort. Horkheimer and Adorno both prominent philosophers of the Frankfurt School of Marxist Critical Theory agree that “myth is already enlightenment, and enlightenment reverts to mythology”. Implying that the liner progression of the enlightenment has really uprooted its original aims. The notion is that by making man the sovereign of nature has really delivered inverse effects on social nature, which emerge in fascism and Stalinism. Habermas then challenges the focus of the enlightenment critiques of the time and the Norms that we have created that digress from the progression of the movement.…

    • 110 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Max Weber's observations and conclusions regarding modernity and its causes have named him one of the most influential sociologists of our era. Weber believed that in the West rationality had come to become the predominant impetus for action. Weber said that Rationality was one of four motivations towards actions--the remaining three, Traditional, Affective, and Value-Oriented, had been based on more humanistic qualities and had all faded into almost insignificance in the modern age. He thought that this change in stimulus had led to men becoming dehumanised, trapped in the 'iron cage' of production and bureaucracy. Weber's writings sought to understand why Capitalism had come to predominate in the West, rather than other parts of the world, and to examine the different aspects of such a society. Weber argued that sociology was inevitably a subjective science that was dominated by the importance of the individual; this belief led him to employ very unique methods of analysis.…

    • 1754 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Margaret Canovan argued that Hannah Arendt failed to realize that political opinions too have drawbacks. According to Arendt, different people have different opinions and claims that one political opinion can bring an enhancement on another. Based on this assumption, she adopted Kant’s notion of “judgement,” that is, “to think for the sake of general” into her political thinking. But Habermas rejected her ideas on the ground that it is “monologic.” She seems to have left no room for “rational truth” in political affairs. On the other hand, Canovan also disputed on Habermas’s insistence for fixing his attention on rational consensus. Habermas assumes that “just” society can be institutionalized if political discourse is based on ideal discourse. On this ground, Arendt also argued that Habermas’ idea of placing politics on rational consensus might lead him into a dangerous illusion. Canovan’s concern on the distinctive views of rational communication between Arendt and Habermas however leave a sarcastic remark on the latter because according to her Habermas might have to wait his whole life in…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Habermas J, 1991,The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MIT Press, retrieved 29 April 2014, < http://books.google.com.au/books?id=e799caakIWoC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false>…

    • 1974 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx's Theory of History and the Recovery of the Marxian Tradition: Science & Society…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Policymaking and the Media

    • 8143 Words
    • 33 Pages

    Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of Bourgeois society. Cambridge: Polity Press.…

    • 8143 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wolff, J. (2006) An introduction to political philosophy. 1st edn. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.…

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In The Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx and Frederick Engels present their view of human nature and the effect that the economic system and economic factors have on it. Marx and Engels discuss human nature in the context of the economic factors which they see as driving history. Freud, in Civilization and Its Discontents, explores human nature through his psychological view of the human mind. Marx states that history '...is the history of class struggles ' (9).…

    • 1112 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Public Sphere

    • 1842 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Similarly, a majority of modern conceptualisations of the public sphere relate back to Jurgen Habermas and his bourgeois public sphere. Habermas defines it as…

    • 1842 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx is regarded by many as the first social scientist ever. Although it is argued that Adam Smith was the first great economist, and David Ricardo the first great modern economist, Marx is undoubtedly the economist that has had the biggest impact on economic history. It was he that masterminded the concept of a socialist utopia, which ultimately led to over a third of the world been ruled under the communist regime , a model that Marx concocted. Born on 5 May 1818, in Trier, one of Germany's oldest cities, Marx was the first economist who infused history, philosophy, economics, sociology and political theory all into his work. Marx was ahead of his time, his theories were ground breaking, only time would tell whether his predictions would come to fruition. Marx's main claim was that capitalism would eventually fall due to its own internal contradictions and faults, to be replaced by a socialist utopia, so to speak. Marx had many complex motives behind the eventual fall of capitalism, he delves in to great detail about these reasons in his masterpiece Capital (1867), in this text Marx writes about how the capitalist system will falter over time due to the way it operates. It is these faults of the capitalist system that are brought in to question when analysing an issue of this nature, what weaknesses did Marx identify in his writings and were these weaknesses evident in the capitalist system come the end of the twentieth century?…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    This essay explores Marx’s influence on community development, within the parameters of social justice. I felt it was necessary to narrow down the focus of this topic as Marx has been translated, philosophized, reiterated, rewritten and rethought by a plethora of philosophers, sociologists, economists etc. I am also concentrating on Marx’s written ideas with regard to Western civilization. This essay does not enter into debate or description of contemporary Marxist or neo-Marxists approaches. Also, included in the discussion is conflict theory within which Marx’s ideas are formulated. Five of Marx’s major contributions to sociology and economics are described to inform the essay. These entail alienation, economic life and other social institutions, social classes, conflict as a theory of social change and capitalism. The general concepts of Marx’s theories are analyzed in relation to community development, its definition and the notion of social justice.…

    • 3845 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    end of history

    • 1207 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Held, David., Review: Liberalism, Marxism and Democracy, Theory and Society, 1993, Vol.22 No.2. Accessed on 18th February 2014. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/657772, pp.249-281…

    • 1207 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The ideology of Marxism has been at the forefront of far-left political thought ever since Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels published their groundbreaking thesis, The Communist Manifesto, in 1848. The publication gave birth to a new dimension of politics which has had a resounding influence on generation after generation throughout the modern world. However, despite the affect that Marxism has had on modern political agendas, the theory now resembles a fallen giant. A contemporary analysis of the Marx’s ideology poses the following question: does the development of capitalism open a possibility for the development of Marxist thought, or does it more and more radically question it? A serious question mark has been raised against the relevance of Marxism in the contemporary times.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism (Sociology)

    • 2198 Words
    • 9 Pages

    AQA AS/A SOCIOLOGY ESSAY: CRITICALLY EXAMINE MARXIST PERSPECTIVES ON TODAY’S SOCIETY Classical Marxism is a conflict structural theory which argues that, rather than society being based on value consensus as functionalists would contend, there is a conflict of interest between different groups (social classes) because of the unequal distribution of power and wealth. Marxists are also interested in the way in which social change can occur, particularly in sudden and revolutionary ways. However, there are differences between Marxists especially over the way which social change can come about. For example, humanistic Marxists like Gramsci give a greater role to the conscious decisions and actions of human beings than do structural Marxists like Althusser, for whom social change comes as the product of changes within the structures of society. One of the key ideas of Marx was historical materialism. Materialism is the view that human beings have material needs such as food, clothing and shelter, and must therefore work to meet them. In so doing, they use the forces or means of production. In the earliest stages of human history, these forces were just unaided human labour, but over time people develop tools, machines and so on to assist in production i.e. there are innovations in technology. In working to meet their needs, humans also cooperate with one another: they enter into social relations of production – ways of organising production. Over time, as the forces of production grow and develop, so do the social relations of production change. In particular, a division of labour develops, and this eventually gives rise to a division between two social classes: a ruling class that owns the means of production and a subject class of labourers. From then on, production is directed by the ruling class to meet their own needs. Marx argued that in any class-based society – be it ancient, feudal or capitalist – one group gained at the expense of the other. According to Marx,…

    • 2198 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics