Moles of water = mass/mr
= 1.84/18
=0.102
CuSo4 moles = mass/mr
= (5 - 1.84) / 160
= 3.16 / 160
= 0.01975
0.102/0.01975
= 5.16 moles
Conclusion: The results show that the difference in mass between the experiments differed by .001. This means each repeat was done in a very similar manner how ever there was a 0.97% error as the true value should have been 5 this could have been caused by a miss read of the scale or some other anomaly.
Evaluation: This experiment went well there was not manny problems that could cause a major change in the results, however I noticed that some of the crystals stuck to the stirring rod this could decrease the ending mass too much. Additionally there was a soot buildup on the bottom of the crucible however these are minor and wouldn't make much of a difference. To be precise I used a top hand balance that measures to two decimal places.
Improvements: In order to solve the issue of the crystals sticking to the stirring rod could be solved by adding the rod to the scale and measure it with the crucible both before and after then deducting it. Additionally it could be solved by being extra cautious and making sure you remove the crystals from the rod on the side of the crucible.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The standard deviation in the average molarity was 8.9710-4 M. and for the percent variation in average molarity it was 88%. The standard deviation illustrates the percision of the experiment for week one. Being that it is so low, it shows how consistent the results that were taken were. The percent variation shows the accuracy, which was below the 1% maximum. Since the results were both percise and accurate, this shows that the results are reliable…
- 531 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
* Use analytical balance to find mass. Handle with tongs to avoid getting finger prints on crucible and lid.…
- 1639 Words
- 7 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In the first process of the lab, you measure the mass of water transferred from a buret to a beaker, to determine the experimental mass of the water, and the volume of the water collected. We measured the temperature of the water so we could calculate the density of the water, which enabled us to calculate the actual volume of water, by using the density and the measured volume of water. To determine the percent error, we had to subtract the actual volume of water by the experimental volume of water transferred from the buret to the beaker, and then divided it by the actual volume and multiplied it by 100. In the second process, you perform the same steps you did for the buret, but instead, you use a 5.00mL or 10.00mL pipet. You repeated each…
- 992 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The first step in the experiment was to measure the mass of the crucible for trial 1. The second step was to add the Sodium bicarbonate using the scoopula into the crucible. The mass of the crucible and the Sodium bicarbonate was weighed. Next, the mass of just the Sodium bicarbonate was determined by subtracting the mass of the crucible and the substance by the mass of the crucible by itself. For all three trials, the mass of just the Sodium bicarbonate was exactly 2 grams.…
- 187 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Then I used the spatula to collect a tip of crystal and allow drying between folds of filter paper which will be used for the melting point.…
- 503 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
4. Using the spatula add 3g of copper sulfate hydrate crystals to the crucible and determine the mass.…
- 971 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Curl the magnesium ribbon around a pencil to make a size that just fits inside the crucible. Do not curl the ribbon too tightly.…
- 278 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
We repeated our experiment due to having more reliable results as well as being more accurate to see if there was to be any anomalous results. We could also be able to calculate a mean using the data we have collected as we had more results…
- 608 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The process is to record the tare weight of a clean crucible. According to WiseGEEK, tare weight is the weight of an object (such as a jar, a cup, or, in this case, a crucible) when it is empty. You will add 2g of the copper sulfate hydrate crystals into the crucible, and then you weigh the crucible with the copper sulfate hydrate crystals and record the data. You then heat the crucible with the hydrate in it with a Bunsen burner for slightly more than 10 minutes, and then you weigh and record the data into your data table. After the weighing, it is reheated for five more minutes, and again weighed and recorded. If the masses are not within 0.05g of each other, you reheat it for another two minutes, weigh the masses again, and record the data. Keep reheating it until the weights are within 0.05g of each other. Then you will calculate and analyze…
- 465 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Obtain and wear goggles. 2. Measure and record the mass of a clean, dry crucible without cover. Obtain about 1 g of the unknown copper chloride hydrate and place it in the crucible. Use a spatula to break up any large pieces of the substance by pressing the pieces against the wall of the crucible. Measure and record the mass of the crucible with compound. 3. Set up a ring stand, ring, and clay triangle for heating the sample. Rest the crucible on the clay triangle. Set up a lab burner and ignite the burner away from the crucible. Adjust the burner to get a small flame. 4. Hold the burner in your hand and move the flame slowly back and forth underneath the crucible to gently heat the sample. Do not overheat the compound. Note the color change, from blue-green to brownish, as the water of hydration is driven out of the crystals. When the sample has turned brown, gently heat the crucible for two more minutes. 5. Remove and turn off the burner. Cover the crucible and allow the sample to cool for about ten minutes. 6. Remove the crucible cover and inspect your sample. If you see any blue-green crystals, reheat the sample until the crystals have turned brown. 7. Measure and record the mass of the cool crucible of your copper chloride sample. 8. Transfer the brown solid to a clean and empty 50 mL beaker. Rinse out the crucible with two 8 mL aliquots of distilled water and pour the water into the 50 mL beaker. Gently swirl the beaker to completely dissolve the solid. Note that the color of the solution is green as the copper ions are rehydrated. 9. Measure out about 20 cm of aluminum wire, coil the wire, and place the wire in the beaker of solution so that it is completely immersed in the copper chloride solution. Note that the reaction produces a gas, elemental copper is forming on the surface of the aluminum wire, and the color of the solution is fading. The reaction will take about 30 minutes to complete. 10. When the reaction is done, the solution will be colorless.…
- 1437 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
In this experiment, we were able to see that some residual reagent left over from other steps can damage the results. The value was higher than the literature value, most likely due to contamination from previous steps. To get rid of this in the future, it is important to let crystals dry all the way after a suction filtration, in order to make sure no residual is left on them. Also, be sure to let everything dissolve completely, which might have been a problem since time was running short.…
- 264 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Use the stirring rod to stir the distilled water and the salt until you can’t see the crystals anymore…
- 1235 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
You have to be very precautious while doing this experiment. Here are reasons/possible errors that could have been…
- 488 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The identity of an unknown hydrate was determined by massing the hydrate before and after heating and calculating the percentage of water.…
- 755 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
During this lab there was no error in the outcome or predicted outcome. The lab showed the average of all three of the beanium isotopes. The average is what was expected from the calculations.…
- 268 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays