Once he was eighteen, he ventured to England on a university scholarship, with the ambition of becoming a renowned author. After completing his course at Oxford, he worked part-time for the BBC on a world service program known as Caribbean Voices. While he was there, he began writing short stories. However, his reputation as a significant international writer was not established until the publication of his fourth book 'A House for Mr Biswas'. Following its major success, he began traveling the globe and writing about what he experienced. (Prescott, 2008, p.259) With regards to the author’s background, one can only assume that he was actually aware of the cultural encounter that occurred within this story but Santoch was not. From the beginning of the story, he did not strike me as the shrewd, cunning, and ingenious character that you would expect the protagonist to be. As the story developed his actions and choices proved my assumption. He was a weakling. Instead of forcing people to accept him, his culture, and his identity he blindly followed them and their beliefs on the expense of his own. He followed the proverb 'when in Rome do as the Romans do' but his course of action was wrong and it lead to his
Once he was eighteen, he ventured to England on a university scholarship, with the ambition of becoming a renowned author. After completing his course at Oxford, he worked part-time for the BBC on a world service program known as Caribbean Voices. While he was there, he began writing short stories. However, his reputation as a significant international writer was not established until the publication of his fourth book 'A House for Mr Biswas'. Following its major success, he began traveling the globe and writing about what he experienced. (Prescott, 2008, p.259) With regards to the author’s background, one can only assume that he was actually aware of the cultural encounter that occurred within this story but Santoch was not. From the beginning of the story, he did not strike me as the shrewd, cunning, and ingenious character that you would expect the protagonist to be. As the story developed his actions and choices proved my assumption. He was a weakling. Instead of forcing people to accept him, his culture, and his identity he blindly followed them and their beliefs on the expense of his own. He followed the proverb 'when in Rome do as the Romans do' but his course of action was wrong and it lead to his