Preview

Dakota Access Pipeline Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
959 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dakota Access Pipeline Case
The government should not come in contact with property that does not belong to them unless consent is given by the owner. In the case of Standing Rock, the government was never given permission to construct the oil pipeline in their Indian Reservation territory. The government should not be allowed to construct the pipeline in Indian Reservation territory because first of all that property is not theirs is the Sioux’s Tribe property. Second of all, the oil pipeline is going to produce many complications for the environment and the community around it. Third and final of all this is going to give America a bad image.
If the property does not belong to the government, the soil should not be altered unless consent is given by the property owner. To begin with, the route that the Dakota Access Pipeline is being built on was placed on sacred ground of the Sioux Tribe. The sacred ground includes the Standing Rock Indian Reservation and it includes graveyards were they have buried their ancestors. Now before the government wants to build something, they need to make sure that whatever they are
…show more content…
On the case of the Dakota access pipeline, the environment is in peril. Now, since the Dakota access pipeline is running under the Missouri River, it shows that the United States does not really stress about the environment. In the situation of the sacred land involved, the pipeline is being built on sacred ground that belongs to the sioux tribe in Standing Rock. This situation makes America look like they do not care about the customs or religions of the tribe. Both of these situations goes to show that America is greedy. It shows to the world that America cares more about making money than they do about caring about the environment or caring about a group’s cultural beliefs. Does America really want to have a bad

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The development of the tar sands project against the purpose of harness private interest to serve the public interest. The term “Public” contains two aspects: the public human aspect and the public environment aspect. First of all, the booming economies of the developing countries and the obsessive oil needs of the developed countries have triggered massive oil sand exploitation in countries like Canada. Pipeline transport companies like Keystone and Enbridge captures this opportunity to make financial growth. Instead of harness private interest to serve public interest, these companies embrace their private interest and ignore the public interests. While…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Keystone Pipeline is a pipeline system that holds oil and it runs through the United States and Canada. More specifically, it starts in Alberta, Canada at the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin and travels to oil refineries in Texas and Illinois as well as oil tank farms and an oil pipeline distribution center located in Cushing, Oklahoma. The Keystone Pipeline consists of three phases as well as one more operation that was awaiting approval but has been rejected. The first phase is the pipeline bringing the oil from Hardisty, Alberta to a connection in Steele City, Nebraska which then disperses into refineries in Illinois. The second phase is an extension that leads from Steele City to distribution and storage facilities…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case, the City of Monroe, North Carolina decided in April of 2002, to supply the citizens of Monroe and surrounding area with natural gas through a direct connection between its natural gas distribution system and the Transcontinental Pipeline. The Transcontinental Pipeline transports and distributes natural gas from the Gulf of Mexico up through the northeastern United States. The parties of this case requested the court to focus on the validity of a local government’s exercise use of its power of eminent domain. According to our textbook, Business Law Text and Cases, eminent domain is sometimes referred to as the condemnation power of government to take land for public use. The town of Monroe, North Carolina entered into an agreement with the town of Midland to facilitate the acquisition of land for the construction of the new pipeline by acquiring the rights of way to local land required for the installation of the pipeline. Per the agreement, Midland had the option to tap the pipeline at discounted rate. Midland then exercised its eminent domain authority to condemn the need…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When I read Dakota Access Pipeline: What's at stake? by Holly Yang the topic was bothersome. For some people reading and they are part Native-American, they would be mad that the government approved this project. The people who have lived there all their lives on the land that the government granted and now the government is going to invade their own land to build a pipeline to carry oil to benefit their economy. The Native-American's have a right to say what happened on their land. The Standing Rock Sioux tribe sued the Corps because it would threaten the tribe environmentally and economically…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before one can form an opinion on whether the Keystone Pipeline should or should not be built, they should first know what it is, and hear both sides of the argument.…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my opinion, authorizing the Keystone XL pipeline would be damaging to the environment. Displace residents from their home or property if it obstructs the construction of the pipeline. And lastly, will only cause a short term economic benefit to the working class who seek long term employment not a seasonal position.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Keystone Xl Pipeline

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Keystone XL pipeline is a possible opportunity for the United States to bring oil to the country without relying on the Middle Eastern countries. The construction of this pipeline would be in response to strong demand of crude oil in out Gulf Coast region, as a result of declining oil feeds from foreign countries. The process of approving the pipeline, beginning in 2008, has been very controversial. Those who approve of the pipeline tend to focus on its economic benefits, while those who oppose it are focusing on the ways it can be detrimental to our environment. TransCanada is the corporation who wants to build the pipeline, they are resposible for building and developing safe energy infrastructires thorughout North America. In addition to importing crude oil from Canada, TransCanada believes, “the Keystone XL Pipeline will also support the significant growth of crude oil production in the United States from producers in the Bakken region of Montana and North Dakota” (“About the”). The process for constructing this pipeline has been a long road, for both sides of the issue. The application was first submitted and…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In recent discussions of drilling in the arctic national refuge, a controversial issue has been whether to drill or not to drill. On the one hand, some argue that drilling for oil can bring many benefits both economically and politically to America, it creates jobs and makes us less dependent on foreign oil. Also in the last two decades their have been many laws to improve the drilling, transport and clean up of oil. We as Americans have a comfortable lifestyle. A large part of which comes from using natural resources. There are a lot of reasons why earth conscious people would want to prevent oil drilling in an area that is protected called The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Spills are probably the first thing on anyone’s mind when they talk about oil drilling and transportation. So why would anyone, besides greedy, millionaire oil company executives, want to drill and transport oil? Drilling for oil can bring many benefits, both economically and politically, to America. It creates jobs and can make us less dependent on foreign oil. Also, in the last two decades there have been many laws and reforms to improve the drilling, transport, and cleanup of oil. These insure a greatly reduce possibility of harmful contamination to the Earth as a whole.…

    • 4979 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hey Xoe, please talk to your following about Standing Rock. More people need to know about what’s happening, because it’s horrible. It seems as though our native people are losing once again. Police are tormenting them on their land. I’m not sure if you know about what is happening, but I feel like it’s important to know, or to educate as many people as possible on the subject. A short summary of this situation would be that there is a an oil pipeline being put through the Standing Rock reservation in North and South Dakota. If you didn’t know oil pipelines have high rates of leaking which would cause the Native Americans living there not be able to use the natural water sources such a lake and rivers. The pipes also will most likely exploded,…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Keystone XL pipeline

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    First, the Keystone XL pipeline would travel through rivers such as Missouri river, Yellowstone, and Red rivers. Two million of population is depended on these rivers for drinking water. If somehow oil spill into these river, it would be a great disaster because people will be out of water until is completely clean again. Also, there marine life will die because of oil which will affect the business of the marine industry. In short, Keystone Xl pipeline will become expense for government. The expenses would be greater than the taxes gathered by the Keystone Xl pipeline…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    shaw and baerry

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages

    •Finally, the world today is full of news about fracking, the process by which a high volume of liquid is pumped into the ground to fracture rock and extract natural gas. What are the ethical considerations of either permitting or prohibiting property owners from using their property in this manner?…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Alaskan Wilderness that we wish to drill belongs to the Inupiat Eskimo people. By drilling in their land, we would ruin their traditional way of life. They “rely on the land and resources of the North Slope for ... physical, …cultural, and …economic well-being” (Document D). The Eskimo people live on this land and although drilling may not have harmed them yet, slowly, over time, the land will degrade by pollutants and drilling. “We…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Domestic Oil Drilling

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Senator Everett Dirksen once noted “The oilcan is mightier than the sword”. In today’s world, it is easy to see why oil can be considered the most important resource to hold. Without oil, many of the common day occurrences we take for granted would be impossible. Oil is used for almost everything; from the fuel used to drive our vehicles, to the plastics used in every facet of life, and providing the heat needed to live through the winter. In fact, the United States depends so much on oil that as a nation it uses over 20 million barrels a day. Importing oil increases the total costs because of the need to transport it from around the world. It is estimated that the United States has 31 billion barrels of oil of known reserves and up to 120 billion barrels of undiscovered oil (Oil Reserves). Many of these oil reserves are located on protected federal lands and offshore areas. The United States currently imports about 58% of the total oil it needs every year (FAQ, EIA). With rising oil costs, looming import numbers, and billions in potential profits; why shouldn’t the United States increase domestic drilling in protected and undeveloped areas?…

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first question is what are the moral responsibilities of the participants in this issue? The land to be drill is government land and the “Bureau of Land Management is responsible for balancing the uses of public lands” (Nightline, 2004). The drillers are morally responsible for the land they lease and the people working in their company. The people living in the area have a responsibility to uphold the environment, their community and homes. The moral failings happen when one does not hold up to their responsibility. In this case, the drillers are not taking care of the land like they should and due to pressure, the Bureau of Land Management is not balancing the use of public land. The people living in the area are trying to uphold their responsibility.…

    • 826 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Keystone Pipeline is a system that transports oil from Canada into the U.S. The owner of this Pipeline is TransCanada, who proposed the idea back in October of 2005. However, the construction on the Pipeline didn’t go under way until 2008. It took TransCanada over two years to acquire all the necessary state and federal permits for the pipeline. The pipeline runs for over 2100 miles, through a number of states and provinces throughout the United States and Canada. There is said to be many advantages of having this pipeline; such as an increase in revenue for the U.S. and Canadian economies. It’s supposed to open a countless amount of jobs and is said to have economic and national security advantages. However, many have argued that the pipeline should not exist due to its negative effect on the environment and will reduce our energy security.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays