(2009). “Fight the Power!” The Legacy of the Civil Rights Movement. The Journal of Southern History 75.1: 3-28.…
Nicholas Lemann is the author of Redemption: The Last Battle of the Civil War, which was published by Farrar, Straus and Giroux in 2006. While the title indicates a focus on redemption following the Civil War there are heavy themes highlighting the struggles of Reconstruction with redeemers as opponents of the post-Civil War goals. Lemann’s basis of argument is that Reconstruction overall failed as a movement due to the state of southern white attitudes and their use of intimidation and violence during elections and was not due to a strong republican forefront. He argues that although the Civil War was over, former slaves were not protected by the law.…
From the ashes of the Civil War, rose a unified nation still embroiled with one another over memory. David Blight argues in Race and Reunion: The Civil War in American Memory that “Some of the real war, and much of an imagined one, was already getting into the books.” In his argument, Blight demonstrates the distinction between history and memory. For instance, the tendency for publishers to only publish works that depicted the War has heroic rather than reporting on the harsh conditions of the prison camps, had a profound effect on memory. Therefore, as veterans and authors laid down their respective weapons and begin a new, equally fierce battle of words.…
Nina Silber’s historical analysis in The Romance of Reunion, takes an in depth look at the groundwork that was behind the reconstruction of the nation after the Civil War. While most historians refer to the political agenda behind fixing the segregated nation, Silber takes a moderately different approach and focuses more on reunification, rather than reconstruction. Her argument is made very clear throughout the book and through the use of numerous illustrations that were developed during this time period, Silber created an approach to the situation that generally focused on the opposing views of gender roles within the North and the South.…
The way Charles B. Dew opened up this book was touching and smart. He and I share the same qualities in thinking about issues by looking at things from both sides, and in ways that haven’t been discussed or thought about. He was a born and raised southerner, and told of his up bringing in the south. His ancestors fought and died for the Confederacy. Although it may seem that he should be a die-hard supporter of the Confederate, he openly looked at this issue at hand and dissected the facts. He also had actual documents, speeches, and writings that supported his these views. He said “I believe deeply that the story these documents tell is one that all of us, northerners and southerners, black and white, need to confront as we try to understand our past and move toward a future in which a fuller commitment to decency and racial justice will be part of our shared experience.” (pg.3)…
The bloodiest war in American history, led by Abraham Lincoln for the north, and Jefferson Davis for the south, both presidents, but two different sides. Both garner for peace, yet one is willing to start a war, while the other is willing to accept it. This essay will compare and contrast the political, economical, and social outlooks on Lincoln’s and Davis’ Inaugural addresses throughout the civil war between the North and South. Slavery, laws, and state rights drove the South to start a war, and Lincoln received the war with open arms. Both sides wanted peace, but their means of achieving it and their leaders’ choices and beliefs differed greatly while still holding similarities.…
As the Civil War came to an end, the South experienced an era of changes. One of the most popular speeches, explaining how the post-war South had grown out of its old customs and made progress, was Henry Grady’s The New South. This document is an important historical speech when comparing examinations of how life was for Southerners in the years following the Reconstruction and the Compromise of 1877. Although this speech is very motivational, it differs from the reality of how the South was managing during this time period. Grady’s vision seemed almost too good to be true when covering the stance of the economy, the termination of slavery, and the attitudes of Confederate soldiers after the war.…
In the South, slavery played a prominent role in contributing to the economy, but more importantly they were abused by the whites and slave owners. The immoral treatment of the blacks and slaves is showcased by Lawrence A. Kuznar who claims that they were in “the era of Jim Crow disenfranchisement of blacks” (Source F) and subjected under “the system of violence and exploitation” (Source C). The violence and lack of voting privileges were all adverse conditions the slaves had to endure from the people of the Confederacy. The mistreatment of slaves was once associated with all the members of Confederacy that have been turned into statues and monuments. Consequently, it is vital that the monuments are keep intact in order to teach visitors about the abusive relationship that existed between the blacks and whites in the South. Even though critics claim that the monuments “still echoes in the nation’s prevailing racial inequities” (Source C), they still serve as an effective method of directly displaying the origin of the inequities present in this…
When change happens, does the change happen immediately or does it take generations for people to notice a difference? The change happening in the southern United States after the Civil War was one that would take a time no one expected. Many citizens thought the end of the Civil War would bring people together but the separation of people was still the same. In this paper, I will conclude that the divide of former slaves and slave owners was still strong and the slave owners did not want to change their ways of life and used anything in their power to get back to older times. The paper will be divided in three parts. The start will discuss the end of the Civil War and the difficulties the former slaves still faced,…
At the end of the Civil War, in which Southerners had fought valiantly against the brutal invasion forces of the North in an effort to protect local institutions and states rights, the South lay broken and destitute. Rather than trying to reunite the country as peacefully and quickly as possible, the victorious North set out on a deliberate policy of rape, pillage, plunder, and vindictive punishment.…
As James Cobb noted those claiming to be “purists” of Southern identities and histories are actually worshipping something that was never pure in the first place. Cobb’s thesis in Away Down South suggested that culture is part of and connected to identity and culture is a process of change that required adaptability to ensure success. The history of the southern identity is not a story of continuity versus change, but continuity within it. Often used stereotypes, for Cobb, strengthen Southerners identites by remaining the same throughout eras of change. These well-worn stereotypes confirm the ability of the South to maintain consistent when the rest of the nation is changing around it. While some historians view the step away from the South as detrimental to the popular image of the South, most have been more concerned…
As Tony Horwitz illustrates in Confederates in the Attic, the Civil War is far from over. Horwitz, determined to find the answers to this conflict, treks through the South, seeking to explain man's longtime obsession with a war that divided the nation. Talking to historians and Civil War reenactors of all kinds, he finds that people are still divided today when it comes to the war and present issues in society. He collects a vast amount of data, which proves to make things very difficult in drawing a general conclusion. Horwitz learns how differently the south views the war, discovers the way in which people use history to suit their own needs, and explores issues of race.…
A man named Bud Sharpe from South Carolina had this to say about the Confederate Flag, “I feel like the flag’s the only thing working people like me have left.” (80) He takes pride in the South and hates that people are trying to change it. In North Carolina, there is a birthday party held to honor former Generals Stonewall Jackson and Robert E. Lee. This proves Southerners still adore their generals that fought for them. After his journey through Mississippi, Horwitz finally realized a pattern that he was seeing. “So there needed to be a black Memorial Day and a white Veterans Day… The best that could be hoped for was a grudging toleration of each other’s historical memory.” Horwitz now understands that Southerners will never forget their heritage. Confederates in the Attic would refute the statement that this country is “one nation, indivisible.” Horwitz witnessed southerners views first hand during his trip. They still hold a grudge against the North for what happened during the American Civil War. Southerners have way too much pride in their homeland to just forget about their history. The South may be part of the United States but they are…
Thomas A. Bailey’s, The Ordeal of Reconstruction (1966), presents a view that would claim the that the actions of the Northern ‘carpetbaggers’ and ‘scalawags’ were both “selfish and idealistic” in regards to the Republican government in the Southern states. Meanwhile, Bailey paints a sad picture of the once enslaved and uneducated Negroes of the Republican government, a role that he attributed as “pathetic and tragic.”…
Why the War Came: The Sectional Struggle over Slavery in the TerritorieLincoln Reconsidered: Essays on the Civil War Era: David Herbert ...…