Preview

David Hume: Life After Death Is Philosophically Unprovable

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
742 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
David Hume: Life After Death Is Philosophically Unprovable
David Hume: Life After Death Is Philosophically Unprovable

By: Marisa Engonga

Human beings throughout history have always questioned “heaven”, and whether or not we survive death have always been one of the big questions of human life. However we all clearly acknowledge the fact that we will all die sooner or later, but the belief of a individual person surviving in some sort of sense is still questioned by so many people; and whether this survival involves either reincarnation, an Islamic doctrine that God will resurrect our bodies at some future time, or simply survival outside the physical body is still a mystery. According to David Hume for the question of life after death, he assures that the possibilities of a person surviving death is philosophically Unprovable on which I disagree with him because of the simply fact that there has to be something more after this life, and because 2 follow 1, which I consider a proof to assume that this life is followed by another, an after life. In his writing titled “ Life After Death Is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Powerful Ideas, An Introduction to Philosophy, aesthetics means "coming from the senses" which is a derivitive of the Greek word, aisthetikos (241). David Hume's believed that emotions are significant in both aesthetics and ethics. In addition, he stated that aesthetics involves both contemplation and judgment. He strongly believes that not everyone is suitable or qualify to judge art.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I can remember how when I was young I believed death to be a phenomenon of the body; now I know it to be merely a function of the mind−and that of the minds of the ones who suffer the bereavement. The nihilists say it is the end; the fundamentalists, the beginning; when in reality it is no more than a single tenant or family moving out of a tenement or a town (42).…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In his essay "The Myth of Immortality," Clarence Darrow explains his belief that life after death is a hoax and backs up his logic with logical reasoning. Darrow finds it hard to believe that life exists after death simply because there are no facts to prove that it exists. He states that "if people really believed in a beautiful, happy, glorious land waiting after death why don't they hasten themselves to it." Darrow also shows his discern in his views for the soul questioning that if we do have a soul, when is it created in the natural process of reproduction? He also questions "If a man has a soul that persists after death, that goes to a heaven of the blessed or to a hell of the damned, where are those places?" Moreover, he goes into detail and explains his reasoning against the resurrection of the body. He states the mere thought of such ideas beggars reason, ignores facts, and enthrones blind faith, wild dreams, hopeless hopes, and cowardly fears as sovereign of the human mind, despite the fact the bible clearly states that Jesus has risen from the dead and ascended into heaven. Darrow moves on into the scientific reasoning stating that people take comfort in the law that matter and force cannot be destroyed, meaning their soul lives on forever. Darrow continues and says that there is no proof that memory and consciousness exists after death. Even more, Darrow continues with his statement "We are assured that without faith, life is only desolation and despair." Or in other words, Darrow says that people "create" a place that exists after death in order to ease the natural fears. In conclusion Darrow states "we should be more kind to each other and make our lives easier for we live a common life and die a common…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Hume puts forward two separate but very closely related arguments against miracles. Hume argues that the probability of miracles actually happening is so low that is irrational and illogical to believe that miracles do occur. Hume is an empiricist, meaning that he emphasises experience and observations of the world as the way of learning new things.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In discussing this statement, we must first define the words resurrection and reincarnation to decipher what they mean. Resurrection is the act of rising from the dead or returning to life and reincarnation is the rebirth of a soul in a new body. There are many problems surrounding the two due to mainly religious beliefs. I will be focussing mainly of the religion of Hinduism as they believe in reincarnation, and Christianity which believes in resurrection.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The majority of religions have a clear belief in the concept of life and existence after death; however, the detail of what happens and how it happens differs between every religion and it predominantly depends on the beliefs about the soul.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to David Hume, statements concerning future matters of fact always require empirical support. It is impossible to have knowledge of such facts without grounded impressions, or experience. Hume declares that justification for claims of future matters of fact are inferred from cause and effect relationships rather than from tangible experience. Similarly, cause and effect relationships are recognized through experience. Human’s naturally reason inductively, or in other words, use experience to establish beliefs about things which have yet to be observed. Hume argues that through such assumptions, it is impossible and rather foolish to derive any reliable conclusions about the world based on inductive reasoning.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    David Hume is a renowned Philosopher that has shaped the ideas of cause and effect (causality) as we know them today. He suggested that true cause and effect relationship has to be the result of A causing B. The occurrence of B happening is contingent on the fact that A occurs before B, thus causing B to happen. Since he holds that this is the only rational way to conclude that one thing causes another to happen, he goes as far as to say that human beings will never know the exact cause that takes place in order for B to be the result. Hume comes to this conclusion because he maintains that there are secrete causes that cannot be observed by the human eye, thus it is impossible for humans to rationally conclude that one thing caused another…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If death is the perpetual and permanent end of our existence, the question comes up, if suicide is morally right or wrong. Should death even be feared? Suicide rates are increasing, in fact, 2015; there was a suicide rate of 11.4 per 100,000 people, or in perspective, 800,000 in the world. My standpoint on suicide is that it is morally acceptable to do it under any circumstances.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each time I gaze into a mirror, or respond to a question or assert a preference that requires a personal perspective, ‘I’ thereby assume an idea of personal identity. As ordinary common sense dictates, that personal perspective is my own insofar as I maintain a sense of ownership of my personal identity. In this view of ordinary common sense, ‘I’ assume ownership in light of the perception of ‘me’, ‘I’, or ‘myself’ (my emphasis). However, in Hume’s view, to have first-person perception of me is to have experiences of bundles of impressions from past experiences that are as temporally distant as my youth, yet as temporally local as now. Accordingly, phenomenal experiences of personal identity occur in constant conjunctions of experiential data…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apol 104

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Is there life after death?” and “What will happen to me when I die?” There is life after death, but there are two different places that one can live their eternal life after death (Roman 6:23). Eternal life can be spent in Heaven or in the fire pits of Hell. God determines whether we live eternal life in Heaven or Hell; when he judges us based on our lives on earth (2 Corinthians 5:10).…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume and Matters of Fact

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to Hume, there are two types of beliefs, relations of ideas and matters of facts. Relations of ideas are indisputable. Such as a widow is a woman whose husband died. Such thoughts are usually definitions. Since it is impossible for a Widow to be anything other then the definition, these ideas are indisputable. Matters of facts claim that if the opposite is imaginable, then it is possible. Matters of fact are debatable, such as the belief in a God or that the world will end. While it is true that these abstract ideas are easily debatable, other ideas that we held as true are also only matters of fact, such as putting wood in a fire will make I burn. While we hold that it is true that everything falls towards the earth, and that the sun rises, it is possible that the sun will not rise and that things will not fall towards the earth, these beliefs are matters of fact because we can visualize the opposite occurring…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, David Hume writes that “Whatever exists must have a cause or reason of its existence; it being absolutely impossible for any thing to produce itself, or be the cause of its own existence.” He claims that in going through the causes and reasons of each existing thing that we either have to “go on in tracing in tracing an infinite succession, without any ultimate cause at all”, (which Hume states is “absurd”) or we “must at last have recourse to some ultimate cause, that is necessarily existent” (Hume). Even at the most basic level of life, sub-atomic particles, cannot produce themselves; something is necessary for their existence. Hume then states:…

    • 861 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While many rationalists such as René Descartes support the notion that the concept of Inception is not possible, empiricists such as David Hume may think differently. Hume was an eighteenth-century Scottish philosopher known for his system of radical and philosophical empiricism, skepticism, and naturalism. In one of his works, Hume stated that one cannot create completely new ideas without either prior knowledge of those ideas, or experiencing those ideas. Put differently, he believed that the ideas of an individual are derived or inspired by other ideas that the individual has observed, because there is no such thing as an “original idea.” Taking Hume’s theory into account, in the movie Inception, the protagonist Dom Cobb teaches his new architect, Ariadne, how dreaming works. In their shared dream, Ariadne comes across Dom’s wife, Mal. While this…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A principal cause of Hume’s beliefs differ from that of philosophers like Descarte due to Hume’s rejection of the metaphysic. Hume believed that statements like ‘The sun will rise tomorrow’ were the epitome of human egotism, of which no true answers could ever be found. The only ‘valid’ argument to support such a statement would be the inductive reasoning that the sun has risen before, hence it is very likely that the sun will rise tomorrow. But that argument in and of itself is simply epistemological and strays from the actual assertion. According to Hume, there are relational ideas and then there are facts, only one of these forms of which could be based on true reason.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays