Preview

David Hume's Influence The Will

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
814 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
David Hume's Influence The Will
Hume is responding to traditional views that right action can and should be determined by reason and Reason cannot influence the will. This is shown by the following: firstly, reason can never motivate action and secondly, reason can never oppose or prevent actions motivated by passions or emotions. Reasons are of two kinds: demonstrative and probabilistic. Demonstrative reasoning is deductive; it allows us to draw specific claims from general ideas. Probabilistic (or causal) reasoning is inductive; it allows us to make general claims from specific ones. Neither kind capable of motivating. Hume draws a distinction between the world of ideas and the world of realities. Our motivation to act is concerned with realities, with specific ends and purposes (like wanting to clear a debt). Contrastingly, our reason is concerned with the world of ideas, with means for those ends (like aggregating numerical sums to calculate the …show more content…
He explains two types of calm passions that may be commonly mistaken for reason, providing an explanation for human kindness and charity as well as a general propensity to seek goodness. Violent passions have a powerful influence on the will and may make people act in ways that are threatening to other people - this could seem a problem for Hume seeking to ground a theory of morality in emotions. So he illustrate that calm passions is associated with good and moral behavior that can constrain other more violent passions. Hume argues that these violent passions can actually be sensible (in a self-defense situation) and that when they are not sensible, calm passions can counteract them. When an agent is observed to have a conflict of will to act in a violent or calm way, and chooses the calm, Hume is arguing that this is the effect of their calm passion rather than

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There have been a number of challenges questioning Hume’s sympathy. Some questioned the subjectivity of sympathy, since there should be an objective basis for moral evaluation, and sentiments, being the product of sympathy which is subjective to some extent, is not entirely an objective basis for moral evaluation. Some others challenged Hume with the “virtue in rags” argument, which suggests that sometimes good motives do not bring about pleasure in anyone, but we still approve of such motives, which is inexplicable by Hume’s sympathy. Another challenge is called the weak sympathy problem, which challenges Hume’s sympathy by pointing out that Hume only allows us to sympathize with others at a particular instant, and the object of sympathy is…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Back in Hume’s time, there were mainly three schools of thought regarding the nature of morality. This debate was initiated by Thomas Hobbes’ view that moral obligations and duties came from self-regarding motives. In response to Thomas Hobbes’ argument, there are two schools of thought, namely rationalism and sentimentalism. Rationalists such as Samuel Clarke argued that morality could be explained by pure reason , and acting morally is just the same as acting rationally. Hume is on the side of the sentimentalists, as he rejects reason as the basis of morality . Hume argues, rather, that it is our moral sentiments that serve as the basis of moral approvals and disapprovals . In Hume’s picture, each action produces certain feelings in the recipients, be it pain or pleasure, and it is through sympathizing with the recipients which we have an impression of the resulting pain or pleasure in the recipients, and thus approve of or disapprove of the active person’s character trait which led to the action.…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In discussing the principles from which we determine moral good or evil, virtue or vice, Hume argues that because the number of situations we may encounter is 'infinite' it would be absurd to imagine an 'original instinct' or individual principle for each possibility. (T3.1.2.6)1 Instead he suggests that, following the usual maxim of nature producing diversity from limited principles, we should look for more general principles.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hume argues future matters of fact are considered knowledge on the basis of cause and effect relationships. He declares that in order to satisfy our knowledge of future matters of fact, it is necessary for us to foremost question how we arrived at the knowledge of cause and effect. Cause and effect relationships are plainly unattainable; we can only make inferences concerning future matters of fact. Hume suggests, “No object ever discovers, by the qualities which appear to the senses, either the causes which produce it or the effects which will arise from it; nor can our reason, unassisted by experience, ever draw any inference concerning real existence and future matters of fact” (Hume, 241). Humans have habit of visualizing one event following another, and declaring the first event causes the second. Hume rejects such an idea, arguing that we cannot declare any inferences taken from past experiences as knowledge of future matters of fact. As Hume addresses the principle of induction, he claims that there is always room for error when making and inductive inference.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume Liberty and Necessity

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Section 8 of Hume’s Enquiry titled “Of Liberty and Necessity”, Hume wants to discuss what liberty and necessity mean and whether or not they can be compatible with each other. This is all really a discussion of Hume’s view of free will and determinism, and how they can be easily reconciled through compatibilism where for example both liberty and necessity are required for morality. He starts off by considering the idea of necessity and defines it as, “the constant conjunction of similar objects, and the consequent inference from one to another” (Hume 150). He wants to talk about its relation to what he calls liberty. He defines his hypothetical liberty as, “A power of acting or not acting, according to the determinations of the will” (Hume 159). This sounds like free will, meaning that people have the ability to act or not act in certain ways. He wants to deny any possibility of chance, because he’s an empiricist, and if you have the possibility of chance, what can you ever really know about the world. In every case, Hume is going to want to go out into the world and see where things come from even these ideas of liberty and necessity to see if there is a way to have both. To take it further, he goes on to claim that we’re all compatibilists without even realizing it. In order to explain his reasoning, he makes three arguments: the necessity argument, the spontaneity argument, and the anti-libertarianism argument.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hume is an Empiricist, this means that he believes that the source of a humans knowledge derives from or mostly from their sensory experiences. In short, people gain knowledge from their experiences. For example, children learn languages through constantly hearing someone (a parent or guardian) speaking to them in a certain language. Another example is that one can come to know what different colors are due to actually seeing the colors. Simply knowing the name of a color does not entail that someone knows what the color actually looks like. One can never fully come to know what a color is by simply being given the definition because in order to know what a color is, one must have a visual of the color to connect with the name. Thus according to Hume, a person learns and obtains knowledge through sensory…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume argued, that although sometimes a good motive does not bring about pleasurable outcomes, we are able to appreciate it . This is made possible by our imagination and our belief of cause and effect, with which we are able to visualize thus appreciate the supposed good outcomes of such a good motive under normal circumstances, and thereby approve of the motive, even if the imagined good outcomes are not realized in the reality . A good motive with good resulting effects realized certainly strikes us more strongly, but when the good effects are not resulted, we tend to correct our sentiment because luck carries no moral value .…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume believes the root of morality is emotion. He believes emotions, or passions, as he calls them, are the driving force behind our actions. Hume believes that how we feel about things determines what we determine is moral or immoral. There is no logical reason for keeping one’s promises if there is no benefit to you. However, we as a people have decided that keeping one’s word is moral because we would like someone to do that for us. We keep our promises because we want people to think kindly of us. There is no logic behind it, but there is emotion. Even when there is nothing to be gained for us by keeping our promises, we still maintain its moral to keep them because of how it makes us feel. This means, even when it is illogical to do something, if we feel it is moral, we should do it. Reason is not enough to change how we behave. It can give us some direction but it cannot compel us to do…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gandhi, on the other hand, believed that humans act violently as a result of a war or disaster, but that their true human nature compels them to be peaceful. In other words, humans only act violently when provoked and when it is necessary for survival. Yet, the Athenians show that people become wild and violent during times of confusion, because their true human nature is allowed to emerge. "Then, with the ordinary conventions of civilized life thrown into confusion, human nature, always ready to offend even where laws exist, showed itself proudly in its true colors, as something incapable of controlling passion, insubordinate to the idea of justice, the enemy to anything superior to itself…" (p. 245)…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hume 's take on human morality is a very interesting one indeed to contemplate. His main argument on the topic is that the morality of humans is totally derived from sentiment, and in no way has anything to do with reason. He first defines sentiment and reason. He says that the former refers to passions such as emotions, feelings, appetites and desires. Then he also goes on to categorize the passions as being either calm or violent. And according to him, it is our passions that lead us to action. He also states that passions can neither be true nor false, they 're "original existences" (Hume 42 column 2 paragraph 3). Then he defines reason as, what we can say, are ruminations of the mind, which includes beliefs, thoughts, conclusions of arguments, etc, and declares that these can be true or false. It is with these definitions in mind that Hume goes on to make the statement that passion and reason cannot oppose each other. Because passions are original existences, they are neither reasonable nor unreasonable though they are the dominators of our actions. Reason, however, can be put to true/false evaluations and are actually derived from our passions. Reason cannot contradict passion because this would be an internal disagreement of ideas, which are considered as copies of the object which they represent, i.e. the particular passion. He states though that a…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature: in Two Volumes. London: Dent, 1934. Print.…

    • 2044 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hume on Personal Identity

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Stroud, B. Hume: The Arguments of the Philosophers. Suffolk: Routledge & Kegan Paul plc, 2002.…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The three techniques I chose are; Visualization I would try to accompany the words I read with the picture, for instance, I am going to try to visualize what I am reading. Making it interesting to myself so that I can remember what I read. Recitation is another technique I am going use. For example reading aloud to myself and hearing what I am reading will help me remember what I read, instead of reading to myself. I have learned I tend to remember thing a lot better when I hear and see it. Distribute the practice this technique is one I think I will use the most. For example Reading a paragraph or topic at a time will help me remember what I read instead of trying to read a chapter all at once. I think learning small amounts of material…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    SAMSUNG MARKETING MIX

    • 947 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Samsung is a South Korean multinational company, founded by Lee Byung Chull, in the year 1938. It entered the electronics industry in the late 1960s. Since 1990s, Samsung has globalized its electronics, mainly mobile phones, which have become its major source of income. The Samsung galaxy series is one of the brand builders for Samsung and hence we will discussing the marketing mix of Samsung Galaxy.…

    • 947 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime & Economy

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the world we as people are living in today, our economy climate is currently in a down fall. There are not enough jobs, and money to keep people employed. The economy is trying to pick up in the U.S. each and every day. I’ve seen times were it’ll gradually pickup, then suddenly begin to fall down. The crime rate throughout the world varies throughout the city and states of our country. Population and cities are all sorts of sizes, some with a higher crime rate than others. Our crime rate in the next decade could possibly lower, rise, or stay the same as now. It’s all based on an individual and how their actions take place.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays