dddddddddddddddddddddddddd

I dont agree with level 1 fully because if we decide to cut our greenhouse gasses then , as we are all industrial and making all of our production from our factories that all run on fossil fules or fuels that all produce greenhouse gassess and if we cut the greenhouse gasses all of our transportation and electronics will fail meaning if we were going to help the maldives we couldnt as we would be in havoc, I strongly agrre though that we do need to help the Maldives and to evacutate or help build up the defences .
I agree on the second option far moe than any other option because we are not cutting all of our greenhouse gasses which would cause trouble , instead we are just slowly reducing our output but not so drasticly that we are loosing most of our production .I agree with helping the maldive goverment to counteract the sea levels rising as it would be quite alot hassel if we were to vacate the hole islands .
I agree slightly with option four as i think we should help the maldives by resettling the maldives because they do not have too much time to build massive sea defences , it will also be very helpfull and kind to the maldives to build some new infrastructure for them .I think that we need to start lowering our greenhouse gasses as this could stat getting alot worse for alot more places
I strongly disagree with option four as there is still chance to help them or move them to a new place to set up their new citilization ,we should also try to save the maldive islands aswell.This option does not say anything about trying to stop our own greenhouse gassess which would mean we did not learn from this and can easily happen later in the future