The death penalty is one of the controversial topics being widely discussed today. Anna Quindlen is one of many people who opposes the death penalty. She is a crime buff who has worked as a reporter for decades in some of the worst areas of New York. In her article, "Death Penalty's False Promise: An Eye for an Eye," she states how the death penalty and her have nothing in common. She claims that the killing of one human being as punishment for the killing of another makes no sense and is inherently immoral. She tries to relate to her readers by using imagery, stating her opinions, and by appealing to the emotions of her readers. Throughout her argument, she also uses many examples to back up her opinions. She gives examples of situations that appeal to her readers sentiments and makes them feel connected to the…
Sister Helen Prejean is against the death penalty and wrote Dead Man Walking to support her viewpoints on the death penalty; however, within the film her viewpoints on the issue appear to be neutral or unclear. There are particular elements within the book that Sister Helen embodies, which are not portrayed clearly within the film version of herself. Sister Helen, in the book depicts herself as confident, knowledgeable, credible individual about the penal system and the injustice within it. Possessing these attributes creates leadership skills and courage, which fuels her to stand by her views on the death penalty, and save the lives of the inmates on death row. Sister Helen Prejean believes life in prison or abolishing the death penalty is…
Matthew Poncelet is sentenced to death for the murder of Walter Delacroix and Hope Percy. He has been closely followed by Sister Helen Prejean who is strongly against capital punishment, and today, we are to follow him for his last day.…
In “Memories of a Dead Man Walking” Helen Prejean is completely in denial of capital punishment. She believes that a men who committed a crime and is in prison with a death penalty is still a leaving person and has rights. Such as “ the right not to be tortured” and “the right not be killed”. She also is convinced that this prisoner have decency as well. Prejean also talk about Patrick Sonnier who was sentenced to death penalty, she was his spiritual advisor until he waited for execution. In her essay she says that she noticed that only poor people are selected for death row. Also it is noticeable how personal and serious she takes this condemned prisoner. She was with him until the…
I believe that throughout this entire reading Sister Helen Prejean does a great job expressing her opinion on the death penalty. Prejean states many facts throughout Dead Man Walking. She also pulls on the audience’s emotions in such a powerful way. Helen Prejean has two accounts of first hand experience with death row inmates also. Sister Prejean uses logos, pathos, and ethos to prove that the death penalty should be banned. She persuades me in everything she says.…
The film Dead man walking was not created on a true case per sea but was constructed on some true people. The personality Sister Helen was indeed based on a genuine Sister Helen Prejean. The character Matthew Poncelet was a fictitious creation manufactured on a permutation of attributes of two real inmates and their criminalities that sister Helen Prejean came in acquaintance with; they are Robert Lee Willie and Elmo Patrick Sonnier.…
Capital Punishment is regarded as one of the United States' hottest topics. Those for and against it constantly debate over the various issues that capital punishment brings forth. This essay explains just a few of these topics and my view on the death penalty.…
Although capital punishment might bring closure to the family and loved ones of victims, who is to bring closure to family of the accused? Taking someone’s life can mean leaving a child fatherless or motherless, it can mean leaving a loving mother sonless or daughterless. There is no real humane way of viewing the…
After having been forced to endure 11 years of religion lessons (which means I have already meticulously examined every single flaw in our “wolfish” society, including the imperfections of our criminal justice system), I was not particularly keen on reading another holy rant by some self-righteous Jesus turned defense attorney. But since capital punishment in the US has become such a controversial issue in the media, I finally decided to give “Just Mercy” a try two days ago. And it has entirely overturned my idea of the law and its (non)conformers.…
In his essay Death and Justice, Edward Koch argues in support of capital punishment, he believes it is just and it saves lives. He successfully delivers an argument laced with true and vivid examples of unforgettable murderous events. His intended audience consists of the opposing voters and readers of the New Republic, the political magazine that published his essay. Prior to reading Edward Koch’s essay I was sure that I would disagree but it became clear to me that he is right. There are seven commonly held views against the death penalty that Koch argues against in his essay. In what follows I discuss a few of his arguments and show that the death penalty is the most viable approach to deal with convicted murderers.…
In his essay, the author includes seven main arguments opposing capital punishment and refutes them. People may find that the death penalty is a barbaric act and Koch argues this point by suggesting that the method of lethal injection is actually quite humane and literally painless. He also argues that although no other democratic country imposes the death penalty as a form of punishment, no other country boasts a murder rate as high as the United States. The author contends with those who believe capital punishment diminishes life’s value by suggesting the contrary. He has found those who are sentenced to death have been judged fairly and with a great deal of examination. Koch then refutes the argument of capital punishment as a state-sanctioned murder by acknowledging that the state holds much different rights and responsibilities than the individual.…
Jennifer Thomson’s main argument and theme that she brings up in all of her lectures are that of capital punishment. She does not believe that capital punishment should be legal, especially after what happened to the man she accused of committing the rape against her. Jennifer states that capital punishment is unacceptable because sometimes the criminal is innocent; like Ronald Cotton. She argues that if capital punishment was a law in North Carolina at the time, that he would have been put to death, a man who had not committed any crimes or done anything wrong would be put to death. She stated that our criminal justice program does make mistakes, and we cannot afford to make those mistakes with people’s lives by ending them.…
Capital punishment throughout history has had many faces in our society. In the early twentieth century capital punishment was viewed as an integral part of the criminal justice system. In the United States alone approximately thirteen thousand people have been legally executed sine the colonial times (ACLU, 2003). By the 1930's up to 150 people were executed yearly, because of various legal challenges the execution rate was almost zero by 1967. In 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court banned the practice of capital punishment, citing the death penalty as it was practiced, cruel and unusual punishment arbitrarily administered by the courts and thus unconstitutional in Furman v. Georgia (Costanzo, 18). In 1976, in Gregg v. Georgia, the Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty stating that under guided discretion the courts again could impose capital punishment for crimes such as murder with special circumstances (Costanzo, 21). Since having the death penalty reinstated in 1976 by the Supreme Court, society has a whole still favors capital punishment, but because of the nature of the punishment there is still a split among society as to the appropriateness of the sanction. In today’s society there are those that are apposed and there are those that are in favor of the death penalty, but the majority still views capital punishment as a staple in the criminal justice system. Public opinion polls show approximately seventy percent of the U.S population currently approves of the use capital punishment (ACLU, 2003). Even with a high approval rate among the population in the United States there is still a large population of people with religious arguments against capital punishment, catholic society by the nature of humanity and evolution has realized that capital punishment is less and less a moral and ethical punishment for capital crimes such as murder. In examining the history of the Catholic Church and the Catholic Church’s moral teachings in regards to the death penalty…
After analyzing Ernest Van Den Haag’s case study ‘In Defense of the Death Penalty’, and Hugo A. Bedau’s ‘The Case Against the Death Penalty’, I have conflicting feelings contradict my own analysis. Ernest Van Den Haag breaks down the pros and cons of the death penalty and uses retributivism to justify death penalty and capital punishment, while Hugo A. Bedau’s article is about the inconsistency in capital punishment and in particular on the abolition of practice. Each article states key positions that make my feelings conflicted between both sides, Bedau backs up that the majority of people persecuted fight through several trails after a long period incarcerated with life sentenced to death end up guilty. (Bedau, 243) Van Den Haag key positions reflect in the retributivist statement, “eye for an eye”. (Van Den Haag, 231) I believe in both sides, and in my own opinion there is no solution for middle ground.…
All around the globe, people have always had a different opinion on the topic of the Death Penalty or as it is better known, capital punishment. The controversy over this topic will probably continue to happen until the end of capital punishment or the end of time. One woman to have an opinion on this controversial topic is Sister Helen Prejean. Prejean was born into a Catholic family, in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on April 21, 1939(Sister Helen Prejean). With both of her parents, Gusta Mae Prejean and Louis Prejean, being very faithful members of the Catholic church she knew that her religion was going to be a major part of her life(Sister Helen Prejean) Being very strong faith based, very educated, and very influenced are just some of the…