Preview

What Are Ernest Van Den Haag's Arguments Against The Death Penalty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1062 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are Ernest Van Den Haag's Arguments Against The Death Penalty
Capital Punishment: A senseless Polemic
Capital Punishment is regarded as one of the United States' hottest topics. Those for and against it constantly debate over the various issues that capital punishment brings forth. This essay explains just a few of these topics and my view on the death penalty.
Many argue that Capital Punishment should be abolished since there are many miscarriages of justice. In his essay "The Ultimate Punishment: A Defense," Ernest Van den Haag uses a survey that indicates that out of the thousands on Death Row, 35 were innocent of capital crimes; even though there may be some miscarriages of justice, we continue to use the Death Penalty because the good greatly outweighs the bad. To add against the unjustices, "Criminal Justice in America," reports from the Death Penalty information Center that 80 have been released from death row due to their innocence. That is 80 unjust lives given the sentence, but how many more lives were saved from the rest given the sentence if the death penalty was abolished? This is how I view those …show more content…
The reason being is because it would be very difficult to ask every individual in our whole country whether or not they have decided not to carry out a murder since there may be a chance of paying with death. However, deterrence may be used to its full potential if every state had Capital Punishment laws; "Capital Punishment: Give it a Chance," makes a great point of this. If consistency were established through our whole country, many would fear the punishment and not commit murder, but the inconsistency as it is right now, many commit a murder since there may be a chance of not getting the sentence, due to its inconsistency of the states. Also, the likelihood of deterrence could be boosted if the lengthy process were shortened, so that possible murderers of the time may witness how executions are a
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bowman And Dilascio The Case Against The Death Penalty
    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Bowman And Dilascio The Case Against The Death Penalty

    It has been proven that the death penalty neither reduces nor increases crime in the United States. Along with this, the execution of innocent people is not ever acceptable, and both sides recognize that. As stated by Freedman, “Capital punishment inevitably will be inflicted on the innocent.” Each of the authors disagree on the amount of innocent people that are wrongly convicted and are placed on death row, but still maintain the viewpoint that a person that did not commit the crime should not be put to death for something that they did not…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Attention Getter For Capital Punishment
    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Attention Getter For Capital Punishment

    Topic: Capital Punishment General Purpose: To argue Specific Purpose: To argue that the United States should outlaw capital punishment in all fifty states. Thesis Statement: Capital Punishment should be outlawed in all fifty states because: (1) capital punishment once executed cannot be undone, and (2) the cost process of capital punishment isn’t worth the expense. Introduction I. [Attention Getter] Imagine being sentenced to die. A.…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Analysis of Death and Justice, by Edward Koch
    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Analysis of Death and Justice, by Edward Koch

    In his essay Death and Justice, Edward Koch argues in support of capital punishment, he believes it is just and it saves lives. He successfully delivers an argument laced with true and vivid examples of unforgettable murderous events. His intended audience consists of the opposing voters and readers of the New Republic, the political magazine that published his essay. Prior to reading Edward Koch’s essay I was sure that I would disagree but it became clear to me that he is right. There are seven commonly held views against the death penalty that Koch argues against in his essay. In what follows I discuss a few of his arguments and show that the death penalty is the most viable approach to deal with convicted murderers.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Primoratz's Arguments Against The Death Penalty
    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Primoratz's Arguments Against The Death Penalty

    If we were to get rid of the death penalty, we would be making all criminal acts proportionate to their convictions, except for murder, which would never allow for equal justice. So, the real question is what the judicial system will do to prevent these incorrect convictions in future? The death penalty is the top tier of capital punishment and is reserved for the darkest of crimes. If convicted murderers get less than they deserve, what message does that send to other criminals who might commit the same act? This argument fails for the same reasons that discrimination fails and that is that getting rid of the death penalty contradicts with getting rid of…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Cost of the Death Penalty
    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cost of the Death Penalty

    Costs and Consequences of the Death Penalty, written by Mark Costanzo, neatly lists reasons for opposition, and abolishment of, the death penalty. Costanzo provides a review of the history of the death penalty, a review of how the death penalty process is working today, questions on whether or not if the death penalty is inhumane and cheaper than life imprisonment. He also questions if the death penalty is fairly applied and the impact, if any, that it has on deterrence. He closely examines the public's support of the death penalty and questions the morality of the death penalty. Finally, Costanzo provides his own resolution and alternative to the death penalty. Each of these items allows the reader an easy, and once again, neat view of how the death penalty can work against out society rather than for it.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should Death Penalty Be Allowed
    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Should Death Penalty Be Allowed

    There is always the problem of someone being wrongly convicted. “At least 4.1% of all defendants sentenced to death in the US in the modern era are innocent, according to the first major study to attempt to calculate how often states get it wrong in their wielding of the ultimate punishment”(Pilkington). Even though the number of innocently convicted people is not that high once an innocent man or woman has been executed there is no way to undo what has been done. The criminal justice system is not perfect and they too sometimes make mistakes. “Whether our criminal justice system has executed an innocent man should no longer be an open question. We don't know how often it happens, but we know it has happened. Cameron Todd Willingham's case proves that. As long as our system of justice makes mistakes -- including the ultimate mistake -- we cannot continue executing people” (Scheck). Sometimes people make mistakes but innocent people being convicted and executed for a crime they didn’t commit is a mistake that can be prevented by making sure the death penalty isn’t an option for punishment any more. Innocent people don’t have to worry about this anymore if the death penalty is no longer possible there are also other options of punishment besides…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    should the death penalty be reinstated in the uk?
    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages

    should the death penalty be reinstated in the uk?

    The death penalty is never the right choice. In America last year fifty three people were executed, and at this time in the USA over 3500 people are on death row. The amount of people on death row shows that the use of Capital punishment is not decreasing crime in America. Therefore Capital Punishment has no point. The latest country to abolish the death penalty for all crimes was Albania in early 2007. The abolition of Capital Punishment in Albania shows that the death penalty obviously doesn 't work. The country tried using it and it failed. Since 1973, there were 138 death row exonerations in the United States. That 's 138 innocent people who were mistakenly sentenced to death in a U.S. Court room, and later had their convictions overturned due to further research in light of new evidence. The fact is: the death penalty is much more of a retribution measure than a preventative measure. There is no clear cut proof that the death penalty will prevent people from killing each other…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Wild Justice: The Death And Resurrection Of Capital Punishment Essay
    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A Wild Justice: The Death And Resurrection Of Capital Punishment Essay

    The death penalty has been a criminal sentence imposed in America for hundreds of years, but it have been extremely controversial as Evan Mandery illustrates in “A Wild Justice: The Death and Resurrection of Capital Punishment in America.” Today, the death sentence is strictly used in murder cases and in thirty-two out of the fifty states in America. In these states, it is completely legal to use the ultimate punishment of death to incapacitate a criminal from committing any further harm to society. Throughout American history, many individuals have supported the death penalty because they believe it is an effective way to deter crime and is a form of retribution. Others have strongly advocated against capital punishment because it is not morally correct and it not applied fairly. Also, some argue that it is unconstitutional to use the death penalty because it violates the cruel and unusual punishment provision of the Eight Amendment written in the United States Constitution.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Pro Death Penalty
    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Argumentative Essay On Pro Death Penalty

    The death penalty is an extremely controversial topic in America, and people usually shy away from it, but speaking about controversial topics can help us come close to actually find solutions. This exercise was conducted in my survey of law class in which, we had gone over several homicide cases in which the criminal received the death penalty. In the end of the lesson, our teacher asked a simple question “raise your hand if you believe in the death penalty”. I was appalled to see that more than half believed it was worth it. In my mind it was clear that even though that person could have murdered another human being, we have no jurisdiction to kill them, and we would be no better as civilized being if we killed him.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Cause And Effect Rough Draft
    • 682 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cause And Effect Rough Draft

    Capital punishment is a highly debated topic in the United States. The question that provokes…

    • 682 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty
    • 4048 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Death Penalty

    Thesis: Capital punishment is useless as a deterrent, morally indefensible, discriminatory in practice, and prone to errors that may have led to the execution of wrongfully convicted people. Its continuing legality in the United States is critically undermining American moral stature around the world. The Supreme Court should bring the United States in line with the rest of the civilized world and hold that death is a cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth Amendment. Summary: The death penalty process consumes tremendous amounts of money and resources and fails to deter criminal activity. It is not uniformly applied geographically, and where it is allowed, it is used in an often arbitrary and racist manner. As a result, states have been curtailing the use of the death penalty, the Supreme Court has limited its application, and both death sentences and executions are down sharply. This is at odds with the recent efforts of some states to expand the range of capital crimes, and with national polls which still reflect a clear majority of Americans favor capital punishment. Meanwhile, momentum has been accelerating in the international community to abolish the death penalty, and the United States is increasingly criticized for failing to keep in step with other civilized nations in this area. Capital Punishment in the United States Since the 1977 resumption of capital punishment in the United States, nearly 1,100 convicted prisoners have been put to death in the thirty-eight US states where the practice remains legal. As of the beginning of 2007, approximately 3,350 people remain on death row in American prisons. In recent years, the evidence has shown that the death penalty process consumes tremendous amounts of money and resources and fails to deter criminals. FBI Uniform Crime…

    • 4048 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty In Prisons
    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Death Penalty In Prisons

    The death penalty now viewed as so barbaric that the views around the world have shifted so much that the U.S continuous to be the only country in Western Democracy to carry it out (Manning & Rhoden-Trader, 2000). The U.S has now begun to recognize so many problems that the death penalty system has such as it being unequally applied to minorities time and time again. Furthermore, the cost of carrying out an execution is staggering compared to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Inmates that were sitting on death row have been and continue to be exonerated which means innocent people can be put to death. One other major problems with the death penalty and statistics have shown that it simple does not deter crime. For these reasons and more I believe we should abolish the death penalty and never look…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Debat The Death Penalty Analysis
    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Debat The Death Penalty Analysis

    Debating the Death Penalty is authored by Hugo Adam Bedau and Paul G. Cassell. Hugo Adam Bedau is a retired professor of philosophy at Tufts University. Bedau has more than two awards and wrote for many newspapers as well as academic presses. He was an editor of the standard work on capital punishment “The Death Penalty in America” and several other books. Bedau also published three volumes of his own essays. Paul G. Cassell was a court Judge of Salt Lake City. Cassell was a professor of Law at the University of Utah. Cassell had over nine honors and awards. He joined the faculty at the college of law in 1992 where he taught, wrote, and litigated on issues relating to crime victims’ rights and criminal justice reform. He has published many law review articles on criminal justice issues in journals. The viewpoints of experts who face questions about capital punishment is expressed clearly in Debating the Death Penalty, showing the moral and legal problems behind it all. I think the death penalty should be allowed as long as there is full evidence that the criminal on trial is quilty.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment Is Dead Wrong Analysis
    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Capital Punishment Is Dead Wrong Analysis

    The death penalty is a major topic for debate Shannon Rafferty defends in her portfolio published by Penn State entitled “Death Penalty Persuasive Essay.” She believes the penalty should be allowed because it functions as a deterrent, it provides society retribution and it is morally just. Olivia H. disagrees with use of the death penalty in her essay “Capital Punishment Is Dead wrong.” She tells about the risk of punishing the innocent, and how the states are doing irreversible acts of crime. As the authors disagree about whether the death penalty should be allowed, they have some common ground when it comes to admitting the potential for human error and in both disagreeing to the use of barbaric punishments by the government.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Anti-Death Penalty
    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Anti-Death Penalty

    The number stands at over 142, and still counting, of wrongly convicted people sentenced to death by the government. Even DNA evidence can’t guarantee we won’t execute innocent people. If someone is convicted and later found innocent, you can release them from prison, but not from the grave. We have an imperfect justice system where innocent defendants are given minimal legal attention by often lesser qualified individuals. Some would blame the court system, not the death penalty itself for the problems but we can’t risk mistakes. The death penalty does not prevent others from committing murder. No reliable study shows the death penalty prevents crimes. Homicide rates are higher in states and regions that have the death penalty than in those that do not.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics