Debat The Death Penalty Analysis

Debating the Death Penalty is authored by Hugo Adam Bedau and Paul G. Cassell. Hugo Adam Bedau is a retired professor of philosophy at Tufts University. Bedau has more than two awards and wrote for many newspapers as well as academic presses. He was an editor of the standard work on capital punishment “The Death Penalty in America” and several other books. Bedau also published three volumes of his own essays. Paul G. Cassell was a court Judge of Salt Lake City. Cassell was a professor of Law at the University of Utah. Cassell had over nine honors and awards. He joined the faculty at the college of law in 1992 where he taught, wrote, and litigated on issues relating to crime victims’ rights and criminal justice reform. He has published many law review articles on criminal justice issues in journals. The viewpoints of experts who face questions about capital punishment is expressed clearly in Debating the Death Penalty, showing the moral and legal problems behind it all. I think the death penalty should be allowed as long as there is full evidence that the criminal on trial is quilty.
The civil discussion acquires after it’s discovered that a convicted murderer, whom was released from prison, has killed again, or when an innocent person escapes the death chamber. The process is revealed in clear, great detail as the experts present their reasons for or against capital punishment. Questions like “ Does the imposition of lesser penalties, such as life imprisonment, truly serve justice in cases of the worst offences?” and “Does the legal system discriminate against poor or minority defendants?” are often asked, making their arguments. The contributors use their experience working on death penalty cases to create