Preview

Death Penalty

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1735 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Death Penalty
Capital punishment is used as an instrument for the judicial system to right a wrong that has been committed against society. Since the 1700s the laws surrounding the capital punishment issue have been refined through the judicial and legislature systems to the current use of today. The death penalty rests on strong foundation of symmetry and rightness. 11 The primary goal has evolved from one for state security to a more focused goal of doing justice and controlling crime.12 The globalization and the inequality are both factors in the controversy of the deterrence of capital punishment. Cesare Bonesana di Beccaria, a philosopher in Italy, wrote “An Essay on Crime and Punishment” in 1764.8 The concerns he stated about the use of death as a punishment are very much the same today of judicial failures, inequality, and effect of deterrence. Beccaria's review was translated into several languages and very well known throughout the world in 1764. He is regarded as the most influential person in changing society’s perception of the death penalty.
The controversy surrounding the use of capital punishment has been a constant since the 1700s. The issues of use are rooted deep globally along with the injustices of inequality and the deterrence effect. Beccaria felt the judicial system had failed in interpretation of the law and making the law obscure. 8
Capital punishment has been used worldwide at some point in history. Ancient legal codes, from the Code of Hammurabi in 1750 B.C. to the Code of Theodosius in 438 A. D., have documented the use of death as punishment.4 During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries there were one hundred sixty crimes punishable by death in England.4 It was during this time that Beccaria wrote his essay bringing the injustices to the forefront for the world to review.
Just recently, in the mid 1960’s, Western Europe took the stance that the death penalty was no longer needed in their society. Britain paved the way for abolishing the
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jeffrey Toobin Summary
    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jeffrey Toobin Summary

    According to the author the modern executioner's job has changed, likewise, the death penalty has also changed. Jeffrey Toobin suggests killing prisoners who are on death row is necessitated but harm should not be caused. The author believes that the death penalty is uncivilized in our civilized society. Toobin also affirms the fact that the death penalty has become unpalatable and gruesome because of the great length's states have gone to come up with other ways of execution. For…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rogerian and Toulmin
    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rogerian and Toulmin

    Capital punishment has been around for decades and continues to alter as awareness of its negative connotations rise. Even in the late 1800’s we saw people trying to adjust the act in an attempt to make it more humane. The battle between morality and justice has developed throughout history and is existent now more than ever.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    CJA 354 week 1
    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages

    CJA 354 week 1

    Capital punishment has continued to be used as the major punishment for convicted felons for a long time now. However, it has been a subject of controversy in recent years and has been seen as an inhuman mode of punishment in the modern era. This is because of the various legal challenges it faces and the methods used in executing the punishment, which include the use of a firing squad, lethal injections and the electric chair among others. However, those supporting capital punishment argue that revenge is the only way justice can be achieved while those against it see it all wrong for the state to take any citizen’s life (Neubauer and Fradella 391).…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Louis Pojman In Defense Of The Death Penalty Analysis
    • 2028 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Louis Pojman In Defense Of The Death Penalty Analysis

    The history of the death penalty can be traced back in time all the way to the fifth century B.C. through Roman’s Law of the Twelve Tablets, where people would be put to death through crucifixion, drowning, and even by being burnt alive.. From there it can be found in seventh B.C.’s Draconian Code, and even in eighteenth century B.C. through the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon, in which twenty-five various crimes would lead to the death penalty (Part I, 2015). Though the crimes punishable under the death penalty and the methods of which the death penalty have changed over time, the ideology behind the method still stands the same: An eye for an eye. The argument for the death penalty stands that those who commit a crime such as capital murder should be punished the same way that they punished their victim: by death. However, while this ethical principle may sound clear and cut on paper, the stance-both for and against-and methodology behind the death penalty is much more complicated than that.…

    • 2028 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rogerian Argument: Capital Punishment
    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rogerian Argument: Capital Punishment

    If we examine some arguments presented from both sides, opponents of the capital punishment claim that executing someone is nothing more than an immoral, state-authorized killing which undervalues the human life and destroys our respect for our government which itself says that killing is wrong. But the supporters of the death penalty think that certain murderers do deserve nothing less than a death for themselves and that although everyone is born with the right to live, criminals lose these rights at the moment when they take away the rights of another human and only by punishing them in such way, the society is affirming the value which is placed on the victim’s right to live.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Cost of the Death Penalty
    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cost of the Death Penalty

    Costs and Consequences of the Death Penalty, written by Mark Costanzo, neatly lists reasons for opposition, and abolishment of, the death penalty. Costanzo provides a review of the history of the death penalty, a review of how the death penalty process is working today, questions on whether or not if the death penalty is inhumane and cheaper than life imprisonment. He also questions if the death penalty is fairly applied and the impact, if any, that it has on deterrence. He closely examines the public's support of the death penalty and questions the morality of the death penalty. Finally, Costanzo provides his own resolution and alternative to the death penalty. Each of these items allows the reader an easy, and once again, neat view of how the death penalty can work against out society rather than for it.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Capital Punishment In The 1800s
    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capital Punishment In The 1800s

    Introduction Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is defined as the physical execution of a person by the state as punishment for a crime. The existence of the death penalty dates as early as the eighteenth century B.C. in the Code of King Hammaurabi of Babylon. The code outlines twenty-five different crimes for which the death penalty was applied. At this time, the means by which the death penalty was enacted included crucifixion, drowning, beating to death, burning alive, and impalement. However, by the tenth century A.D., hanging became the primary execution method in Britain.…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Deterrence Theory: Applying Fearful Consequences To Criminals
    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Deterrence Theory: Applying Fearful Consequences To Criminals

    Historical theories of punishment were based on the concept that applying fearful consequences to criminals would discourage any potential offenders. During the late 1700’s, a criminologist by the name of Cesar Beccaria argued the fact that the death penalty served no purpose as a form of punishment, let alone as a deterrence to criminals. He advocated to reform the criminal justice system through penology, concerning specifically with punishment and deterrence (Beccaria, 2009). In the following essay, Beccaria’s theory of punishment will be thoroughly…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Ac 322 Capital Punishment Research Paper
    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Ac 322 Capital Punishment Research Paper

    When understanding criminal law it is important to consider the positive and negative effects that different punishment alternatives can have. Over the last century the use of capital punishment, the legal process for which an individual is sentence to death when found guilty of committing a crime, has been a subject debated back and forth between government parties on its effectiveness. Many people believe that the issues of fairness, constitutionality, morality of an individual’s life, and potential of convicting the innocent are too important to allow the use of the…

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital Punishment and Catholics
    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Capital Punishment and Catholics

    Capital punishment throughout history has had many faces in our society. In the early twentieth century capital punishment was viewed as an integral part of the criminal justice system. In the United States alone approximately thirteen thousand people have been legally executed sine the colonial times (ACLU, 2003). By the 1930's up to 150 people were executed yearly, because of various legal challenges the execution rate was almost zero by 1967. In 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court banned the practice of capital punishment, citing the death penalty as it was practiced, cruel and unusual punishment arbitrarily administered by the courts and thus unconstitutional in Furman v. Georgia (Costanzo, 18). In 1976, in Gregg v. Georgia, the Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty stating that under guided discretion the courts again could impose capital punishment for crimes such as murder with special circumstances (Costanzo, 21). Since having the death penalty reinstated in 1976 by the Supreme Court, society has a whole still favors capital punishment, but because of the nature of the punishment there is still a split among society as to the appropriateness of the sanction. In today’s society there are those that are apposed and there are those that are in favor of the death penalty, but the majority still views capital punishment as a staple in the criminal justice system. Public opinion polls show approximately seventy percent of the U.S population currently approves of the use capital punishment (ACLU, 2003). Even with a high approval rate among the population in the United States there is still a large population of people with religious arguments against capital punishment, catholic society by the nature of humanity and evolution has realized that capital punishment is less and less a moral and ethical punishment for capital crimes such as murder. In examining the history of the Catholic Church and the Catholic Church’s moral teachings in regards to the death penalty…

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Purpose Of Sentencing
    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Purpose Of Sentencing

    The practice of capital punishment is as old as government itself. For most of history, it has not been considered controversial. Since ancient times most governments have punished a wide variety of crimes by death and have conducted executions as a routine part of the administration of criminal law. However, in the mid-18th century, social commentators in Europe began to emphasize the worth of the individual and to criticize government practices they considered unjust, including capital punishment. The controversy and debate over whether governments should utilize the death penalty continue…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Bern Death Penalty
    • 620 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Bern Death Penalty

    Capital punishment is a punitive measure in which an offender is found guilty through the traditional judicial process and the punishment delivered is execution. Depending on the state the offender was processed in, execution may be delivered in many ways ranging from lethal injection to death by electrocution. Crimes for which capital punishment is applicable for are known as capital crimes. Since capital punishment is essentially about the use of the death penalty, it must be asked whether it is a rational and effective way to react to and address capital the crimes. This writing will explore both the moral and practical implications of capital punishment and also look at it from an ethical viewpoint.…

    • 620 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    History Of Capital Punishment In The United States
    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages

    History Of Capital Punishment In The United States

    Capital punishment has been a topic that has been talked about for ages. It has been an issue in the adjudication process since the first execution took place in the United States of America in 1608 (Schneider & Smykia, 1991). Today, cases are being brought before the courts constantly, and they are forced to decide what exactly is “cruel and unusual punishment” in accordance with the eighth amendment. This paper will be looking at how the death penalty has evolved and developed in the United States. It will also be evaluating the effects of the death penalty and looking at the issues that are being faced today in regards to capital punishment. Also, does the death penalty have a place in the future for America?…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment Is Dead Wrong Analysis
    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Capital Punishment Is Dead Wrong Analysis

    The death penalty is a major topic for debate Shannon Rafferty defends in her portfolio published by Penn State entitled “Death Penalty Persuasive Essay.” She believes the penalty should be allowed because it functions as a deterrent, it provides society retribution and it is morally just. Olivia H. disagrees with use of the death penalty in her essay “Capital Punishment Is Dead wrong.” She tells about the risk of punishing the innocent, and how the states are doing irreversible acts of crime. As the authors disagree about whether the death penalty should be allowed, they have some common ground when it comes to admitting the potential for human error and in both disagreeing to the use of barbaric punishments by the government.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Death Penalty Controversy
    • 2636 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The Death Penalty Controversy

    During the past few years, the death penalty has been the source of controversy in most countries across the world. Supporters of the death penalty have raised many questions over the years: Do we ignore criminals’ social rights? Do we also ignore the legal right of the state to impart punishment by death? At the current time, approximately 97 countries have done away with the death penalty. The real question is do people believe the death penalty is a good thing or should it be abolished altogether? As we can see, there are always two sides to every story.…

    • 2636 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics