The conversation of the team was informative as well as to the point. We discussed how the videos were displayed to us, in our own point of view. I responses to one another were thorough and accurate because each team member watched the videos, and depicted what they had examined in each scenario. The team uploaded their responses and we all responded to one another accordingly.…
A research-based paper will rely upon logos, Aristotle's term for an appeal to reason & logic. An argument will also require attention to reason & logic to be credible. A formula for logos in an argument is claim + evidence = credible argument. All factors should be analyzed in a logical manner to add credibility to an academic argument. 2 common types of arguments are Classic & Rogerian. How do the 4 elements of an argument fit into these 2 styles?…
Up to 7 marks will then be awarded for evaluation (A02). This must be relevant, clearly structured and thorough, coherent and displayed, but ‘not in equal measure’.…
Explain whether the team or group was effective. Support your position by discussing goals, roles, ground rules, norms, and characteristics your team or group displayed. How did these characteristics affect the team’s or group’s ability to accomplish its purpose and solve the problem it encountered?…
I don't know if there is a universal correct definition of critical thinking. I think this a very individualistic tool used by humans to break down different problems and situations and the best way to go about coming up with the best resolution in a non-biased manner. Gathering a thought process that is reasonable and with demeanor. This is simply how I would personally define critical thinking. Thinking things over more than once, second guessing yourself here and there, seeing things from multiple perspectives, and most importantly thinking if your thoughts would be different from the other side of an argument or situation. I think critical thinking is important for us to fully understand ourselves and our situations as well as others and their situations. Critical thinking is considering multiple angles and viewpoints and trying to understand them and where they come from, as well as why they exist. In my life personally, critical thinking has always been something I would like to think I've had due to being raised in a very diverse atmosphere and a very diverse community. I've seen racism towards more than one race, I've seen both sides of different biases, and I have lived in a small town closed minded community as well as the middle of a large densely populated city. It makes you think differently than most around you. It seems like you feel differently than most around you. There isn't much that surprises you so there aren't many situations that you are uncomfortable in. You think before you act, you think before you speak, and you take time and consideration to realize the type of environment you are in and the people you are surrounded by. Things like this don't go through every young person's mind before acting or speaking. You slow down, you react calmer, and you try not to get too high or too low. From this course I don't think I'm looking for how to think critically as much as why some of…
Scoring Key: 1: Applicant indicates they reacted with defensiveness, hostility, or a general unwillingness to listen and, if appropriate, compromise. 2: Applicant provides a story telling about the disagreement, and describes their thought…
As my intended major is in the scientific field, it is vital that I am proficient in all aspects of Outcome 2. Outcome 2 deals with a writer’s ability to read, analyze, and synthesize complex texts, and the writer’s ability to purposely incorporate evidence from the texts in a way that effectively supports not only the authors writing, but their overall complex claim. A writer’s claim is only as good as the evidence that supports it, so it is vital for the author to incorporate scholarly and peer reviewed evidence that advance the writers purpose, and help to achieve the overall goal of the literary work. A writer cannot make an effective argument without having reliable sources of evidence to support the literary work as a whole.…
* Choose two assessment methods that are suitable for use with your group and your topics and make notes on why you have chosen them, how you will use them and what you are using them to check.…
Good and evil are polar opposites, yet one cannot exist without the other. To understand this intricate relationship, one must have a clear understanding on what exactly good and evil are. These two are not always so black and white, but good can be defined as acting agreeably with societical and personal values. Evil can be defined as going against those values. However, as societies and humans differ, so do their moral codes. What is seen as good in one society or time may be seen as evil in another. Two more factors to consider are intentions and actions. They are two separate entities. Actions are seen, and judged, by everyone else, but intentions are known only by the doer. This is why there is no clear-cut line between good and evil.…
Childhood obesity is an ongoing epidemic in today’s society. This essay will focus on three different professional articles, which are related to childhood obesity. The three articles in this essay are “Fighting Childhood Obesity,” “Recognizing and Preventing Childhood Obesity,” and “Understanding and Acting on the Growing Childhood and Adolescent Weight Crisis: A Role for Social Work.” It will explain how the authors of these three professional articles construct their arguments using opinions and evidence.…
The State of Texas is known for their strict rules on voting rights for convicts these including those who are currently incarcerated and those individuals who are released, but on parole. However, ex-offenders who have completed their probation and parole regain their voting rights but would have to re-register. I believe the voting rights for prisoners and ex-convicts should be reformed and changed in the State of Texas. The reason I stand by this is because they’re still citizens of the United States of America.…
Standardized testing in our education system is oftentimes frowned upon. Though some disagree with standardized testing, others see it as an advantage to education in the future. I recently reviewed two articles with opposing opinions on this controversial topic. I noticed that one article worried more about how they felt emotionally, and less focused on the academic advantages or disadvantages. This is an issue in America, I believe when it comes to education we should worry about educational outcomes and not emotional distress due to the criteria in which you are required to abide by.…
Be able to develop skills as an effective public speaker through the application of necessary techniques to become an effective persuasive speaker.…
The exercise provided a great sense of bad arguments and the various fallacies. The quiz gave examples of fallacious appeals such as questionable authority, common belief; two wrongs do not equal a right, common practice, wishful thinking and indirect consequences. Generally speaking the multiple choice answers were tricky as most of the choices were very similar in content and form. The trick to identifying the correct answer is found in previous reading and looking forward. Key words or the way an answer was structured is what gave the correct answer away. From an overall stand point, the general lesson here is to analyze arguments and dissect them which allows one to determine appropriate factual arguments from ones that are formed…
A topic (from any field academic, political, cultural, social, socio-economic etc) is given to a group of about 6 to 12 candidates (qualifying in the written test), who are asked to discuss it among themselves. The aim of this exercise is to identify…