Preview

Decriminalizing Libel

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5986 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Decriminalizing Libel
LIBEL SHOULD BE DECRIMINALIZED

LEGAL RESEARCH PAPER

Submitted to:

Atty. Jill Marie Lopez

By:

Lorenz Corpus

Gerald Dimalaluan

Dayne Espiritu

Neil Eustaquio

Ces Francisco

Darcee Galleon

Jason Gavina

Midi Gentica

Regina Gomez

Carlo Ilano

Noel Illescas

Nadia Karim

Angelo Lajarca

Group 2, 1D

SY 2010-11

table of contents

I. Definition of Libel 3

II. Defenses in Libel 5

III. Arguments for Decriminalizing Libel 8

IV. Bills for Decriminalizing Libel 12

V. Arguments against decriminalizing libel and Corresponding Rebuttals 14

VI. Conclusion 18

VII. Bibliography 20

VIII. Appendix 22

I. Definition of Libel

The Revised Penal code of the Republic of the Philippines defined libel in Title 13 Chapter 1 in Article 353 as:

“A public and malicious imputation of a crime or of a vice or defect, real or imaginary, or any act, omission, condition, status, or circumstance tending to cause the dishonor, discredit, or contempt of a natural or juridical person, or to blacken the memory of one who is dead.”[1]

Defamation is actually the proper term for libel used in Article 353 of the Revised Penal Code[2] Libel is written defamation and slander is oral defamation.[3] It can be committed by means of writing, printing, lithography, engraving, radio, phonograph, painting, theatrical exhibition, cinematographic exhibition, or any similar means.[4]

1. Elements of Libel

The crime of libel, as defined in Article 353 of the Revised Penal Code, has the following elements: (1) Imputation of a crime, vice or defect, real or imaginary, or any act, omission, condition, status or circumstance; (2) Publicity or publication; (3) Malice; (4) Direction of such imputation at a natural or juridical person, or even a dead person and (5) Tendency to cause the dishonor, discredit or contempt of the person defamed. [5] Any of the imputations covered by Article 353



Bibliography: 1. Alcantara vs Ponce. 517 SCRA 74, 83 (2007) 2 3. Novicio v. Aggabao, 418 SCRA 138, 143 (2003) 4 5. Christinelli Fermin v. People, G.R. No. 157643 6 12. Aquino, Ramon C. The Revised Renal Code. Vol III, 1988 Edition. Central Lawbook Supply, Inc.: Quezon City 13 14. Reyes, Luis B. The Revised Penal Code: Criminal Law. Book Two. 1998 Edition. Rex Book Store: Manila. 16. Sack, Robert D. Sack on Defamation: Libel Slander and Related Problems. 2001 Edition PLI Press: New York. 17. Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility, Philippine Press Freedom Primer, 2007 G 18. Balbido, Ma Corinne T. A Liberated Free Press: Proposal to Decriminalize Libel. 2004 VIII [2] Luis B Reyes, The Revised Penal Code: Criminal Law Book Two, 920 (1998 ed.) [3] Balbido, Ma Corinne Tayag, A liberated Free Press: Proposal to Decriminalize Libel, 2004 [6] 3 Ramon C. Aquino, The Revised Penal Code 531 (1988 ed.), [7] Alonzo v [8] Novicio v. Aggabao, 418 SCRA 138, 143 (2003) [9] Balbido, supra note 3, at 11 [15] Cagurangan-Munar, A Second Long Look at the Libel Law, Philippine Free Press, April 7, 1993, at 36 [16] En Banc Resolution October 22, 1991 [17] Approved in A.M. No. 08-1-17-SC at its session of Jan. 22, 2008 [18] Reynato S [19] Senator Jinggoy Estrada, Legislative Agenda, available at http://www.senate.gov.ph/senators/sen_bio/jestrada_agenda.asp (last accessed September 26, 2010) [20] Senator Mar Roxas, Senate Bill No [21] Senator Francis G. Escudero, Senate Bill No. 1403, available at http://www.senate.gov.ph/lisdata/57075067!.pdf (last accessed September 26, 2010) [22] Senator Loren Legarda, Senate Bill No [23] Senator Edgardo J. Angara, Senate Bill No. 918, available at http://www.senate.gov.ph/lisdata/51774544!.pdf (last accessed September 26, 2010) [24] Statement of Former Justice Vicente V [28] Artemio V. Panganiban, Should Libel be Decriminalized?, available at http://opinion.inquirer.net/inquireropinion/columns/view/20080426-132914/Should_libel_be_decriminalized%3F (last accessed September 26, 2010) [29] Robert D [30] In Re: Emil P. Jurado, 313 Phil. 119 (1995) [31] Sack, supra note 10, at 8

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The first rule applied in this case was the rule of libel and slander, which states that the cause of defamation must include four elements: “1) a false and defamatory statement concerning the plaintiff; 2) an unprivileged communication to a third party; 3) fault by the defendant amounting at least to negligence; and 4) special harm of the actionability of the statement irrespective of special harm.” (822) Libel is the defamation of one’s character in written form, and slander is the…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first chapter focuses on slander cases within the Dutch settlement of New Amsterdam, where defamation was often grounds for court…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HSC Legal Studies

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A crime is an act or omission, harmful to the public that is punished by the state in criminal proceedings, initiated and pursued by the state.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eposito Case

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. According to the case, why was this not defamation, and what tort did the court approve a filing for?…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Esposito v. SFX

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    4. According to the case, why was this not defamation, and what tort did the court approve a filing for? (5 points)…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    (1) That the accused did or omitted certain acts or used certain language to or concerning a certain commissioned officer;…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    quiz week 3

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages

    k. Any act or statement made by the suspect that is a partial acknowledgement of the offense…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stare Decisis

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cited: Hall, Daniel E. "1." Criminal Law Today. By Frank Schmalleger. 5th ed. N.p.: n.p., n.d. 10-17. Print.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federal Law on Homicide

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thomas, A., & Chamelin, N. (2009). Essentials of Criminal Law Tenth Edition. In A. Thomas, & N. Chamelin, Essentials of Criminal Law Tenth Edition (p. 135). Columbus, Ohio: Prentice Hall.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    chapter 1 assignment

    • 564 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The main difference between libel and slander is how it’s imposed. Libel is a written or recorded statement of facts about someone or business while slander is a spoken defamation of a person ro a business. (Clarkson, Miller, Cross, 2012, p. 119). A libel case deals with false statements that caused harm or damage such as destroying reputation and causing humiliation for the plaintiff. On the other hand slander case involves plaintiff claiming false or misleading statement that was verbally expressed about the plaintiff and it resulted in an economic or monetary loss for the plaintiff.…

    • 564 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legal Studies Crime Notes

    • 7112 Words
    • 29 Pages

    A crime is an act or omission committed against the community at large that is punishable by the law.…

    • 7112 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Roberson, C. & Wallace, H. (2008). Principles of Criminal Law (4th Ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Inc.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Ashworth, A. J. (2006), Principles of Criminal Law (5th ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Qualified Privilege Essay

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are four major defenses which can be relied upon defamation, justification, fair comment, absolute privilege; and qualified privilege. (Discuss) Qualified privilege, this exists for the same fundamental purpose as absolute privilege which is to protect those who say defamatory statements in circumstances where the common convenience and welfare of society demand such protection. If we compare absolute privilege and qualified privilege we can see that absolute privilege is limited to some defined occasions. On the other hand, qualified privilege applies to the protection of a wider variety of situations whereby it is in the public interest that individuals are able to comment freely on what they honestly believe to be true in their…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Libel's Argument Analysis

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Libel is a term describing visual defamation, usually in the form of lies in print, or misleading or deceptive photographs. Libel exposes or subjects you to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or disgrace, or causes you to be shunned or avoided, or injures you in your occupation.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics