The Native American Indians and the white settlers that eventually kicked the Indians off their lands quite obviously did not share the same idea of what it meant to own an area of land. The Native Americans viewed the land that they lived on as sacred, spiritual, even religious. The white settlers who forced them away from their homes, however, did not have this same concept of the land that they chose to live on; these people viewed land as a way to make money or as another pillar of their personal wealth.
There are multiple accounts of Native Americans expressing their confusion and dislike of the fact that the white settlers were willing to both buy and sell land. In a quote from Crazy Horse, whose Native name is Tashunka Witko, this sentiment is expressed quite thoroughly: “One does not sell the earth upon which the people walk” (Brown 274). Though the United States government initially attempted to acquire the lands by means of compensation and treaty (by an offer to purchase the mineral right for the Black Hills or simply purchase the land that made up the area), we find again that the white settlers used force to take what was not theirs for their own prosperity, which would be found in the gold and minerals that were located in the Black Hills.
The arrival of General Custer and his army to the Black Hills (1874), in which it was formally announced that gold had been discovered in the area, was the first time that the Lakotas had even encountered intruders on their land. Eventually, the United States government, on February 28, 1877, passed a Congressional Act which officially claimed and removed the Black Hills from the ownership of the Native American Lakotas. What the white settlers that power-grabbed these lands from the Native Americans did not take into account is that by taking their land, they were also taking pieces of their ancestral and mythical history. Many Native American tribes, like the Lakotas, lay claim to the Black Hills because of their sacred ties to these lands that are located in western South Dakota and extend into Wyoming. The Native American tribes that most commonly associate themselves with sacred claims to the Black Hills are the Lakotas, Cheyennes, Arapahos, Kiowas, Kiowa-Apaches, Madans and Arikaras. The Lakotas were the last tribe to occupy the land before the United States government seized it in 1877. A court ruling in 1980 ruled that the seizure of these lands was, in fact, illegal and awarded the Lakota tribe over $100 million dollars. The money was certainly no compensation for the loss of their sacred land, and the tribe denied the award. Understanding the reason behind the sacred ties to the Black Hills may help one to understand their outrage at the seizure of their beloved Pahá Sápa (which means Black Hills in Lakota) and the refusal to accept monetary compensation. The Lakota claim to the Black Hills goes deeper than the earth, trees and the natural properties of the land. The Lakota claim is more of a direct correlation between the Hills and the heavens above by “identifying several natural features in the black hills with constellations” (There are areas in the Black Hills that are mirror images of constellations). The idea of the constellations being related to these natural features is later explained:
“Each constellation was associated with one story in the Falling Star myth cycle. Ideally, people’s seasonal movements and retelling of the myths corresponded with these landscape features” (Sundstrom 179).
These so-called Falling Star myths were “associated…with the seven stars of the Big Dipper… the villages are thus both in the Black Hills and in the heavens” (Sundstrom).
The Lakotas viewed the land of the Black Hills as part of their oral, mythical traditions. The Lakotas believed that the Black Hills were part of a dual universe with the heavens, “wherein star people in the sky and humans on earth occupied analogous and sometimes interchangeable roles”. They also believe that “souls of the unborn and of the dead dwell among the stars” (Sundstrom 181). Having the land that they were so deeply rooted in through tradition pulled from their hands by the US government had to be not only a great defeat, but a true, heart-breaking experience for this group of people. The Cheyenne, Suhtai and Arapaho tribes have sacred ties to the Black Hills that differ from the ties made by the Lakotas. One example of these tribes’ sacred ties includes an area referred to as Bear Butte. This area “is the most sacred location in the traditional Cheyenne belief system… and was central to many Cheyenne beliefs and ceremonies…” Furthermore, it is believed that this area of the Hills is “a spirit lodge and that it is associated with sacred caves and the underground caverns where animal souls reside” (Sundstrom 182). There is a belief in the concept of sweat lodge (located within Bear Butte) that is a direct belief that the sweat lodge will renew and cleanse the spirit. Another tie comes from medicines that were brought by a Native American, Sweet Medicine, from the gods that reside in Bear Butte. These medicines given to the Cheyennes allowed for their prosperity. Though the ties to the Black Hills are very different for these tribes as compared to the Lakota, they are still deeply rooted in tradition.
Whether it be spiritual, cosmic, medicinal or practical, these Native American ties to the land are worth more than the monetary assessment made by the white intruders that invaded and took their sacred place.
Bibliography
Brown, Dee Alexander., and Hampton Sides. Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee: an Indian History of the American West. New York: Picador, 2007.
Hendrix, Burke A. “Memory in Native American Land Claims.”Political Theory , Vol. 33, No. 6 (Dec., 2005), pp. 763-785. Published by: Sage Publications, Inc.
Sundstrom, Linea. “Mirror of Heaven: Cross-Cultural Transference of the Sacred Geography of the Black Hills.” World Archaeology , Vol. 28, No. 2, Sacred Geography (Oct., 1996), pp. 177-189. Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
Bibliography: Brown, Dee Alexander., and Hampton Sides. Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee: an Indian History of the American West. New York: Picador, 2007. Hendrix, Burke A. “Memory in Native American Land Claims.”Political Theory , Vol. 33, No. 6 (Dec., 2005), pp. 763-785. Published by: Sage Publications, Inc. Sundstrom, Linea. “Mirror of Heaven: Cross-Cultural Transference of the Sacred Geography of the Black Hills.” World Archaeology , Vol. 28, No. 2, Sacred Geography (Oct., 1996), pp. 177-189. Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In 1874, George Armstrong Custer discovered gold in the Black Hills of Dakota where is Sioux’s reservation. Before the gold rich, in 1875, the U.S. Government made a negotiation with the Sioux for buying the Black Hills; however, the offer was refused because the Sioux considered this land as the sacred region. Ignoring the treaty agreements between the Sioux people and the Americans, the U.S. Army decided to invade this lands led to the battle of the Little Bighorn in June 1876. To the Sioux tribe, they decided to fight for their rights and preserve their reservation from white man; therefore, under the command of Sitting Bull, they were ready for combating so they left their reservation and gathered in encampments along the Little Bighorn…
- 255 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
For the most part Native Americans didn’t have a concept of land ownership. The tribes were very mobile and didn’t stay in one place. They moved from place to place along with the seasons so everything was made so that it could be mobile and could be moved when needed. They did not believe in owning the land however they believe that they should live off of the land.…
- 1217 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
All through the historical backdrop of the New World, there has been strife between indigenous populaces and approaching pioneers that usurp the land and assets. The uncovered histories and ficticious belief surrounding the Trail of Tears and the victory of the Incas and other local societies reminds us as readers that genocide and ethnic purifying leaves a sign of an awesome misfortune on American…
- 65 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Land to the English was a commodity to be bought and sold, to be fenced in, to be owned. They viewed the Indians, who looked at the land as part of nature to be used only to sustain oneself, as a group of people who were not getting all the benefit they could out of the land. In fact, many of the English believed that because the Indians did not use the land properly, it was "free for English taking." This is one characteristic of creating a "frontier of exclusion", the English had no intention of sharing the land as the Indian's philosophy put forth, they were intent on owning the land…
- 999 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Their concept of land ownership is not as well understood because the colonists really never cared what the Indians…
- 1527 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
During the early 19th century, Americans poured into the backcountry of the south and began to move toward and into what is now Alabama and Mississippi, due to the Homestead Act. This act provided 160 acres of free land to any settler willing to live on it and improve it for five years. (Pg.440) However, during these times Indian tribes lived there and they appeared to be the main obstacle to the westward expansion. White American settlers petitioned to the federal government to remove the Native Americans.…
- 895 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
With farming, the Indians had to pay taxes. The land was not a choice to get and now they have to pay taxes on it. If the didn’t pay taxes, then the land would be taken away. The Indians shouldn’t have had to pay taxes because they were forced to take control of the land.…
- 377 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In the mind of the Creeks, the battle was more than just a fight for survival; it was a struggle to tenaciously hold on to traditions and culture which the Creeks felt to be under attack by American colonists. As John Walton Caughey mentions in McGillivray of the Creeks, “Our lands are our life and breath, if we part with them, we part with our blood. We must fight for them.”1 This statement seemed to be a common theme among the Upper Creeks. American colonists and the government hoped the Creeks could be assimilated in a peaceful manner into American society through negotiations and financial enticements: “Westward expansion could then proceed in an orderly way, with Indian population retreating before the advancing American frontier or assimilating with American society.”2 The mainstay of…
- 2541 Words
- 11 Pages
Powerful Essays -
With the Confederation almost complete, forwarded Shawnee decision to send Tecumseh, a young renowned warrior and a strong speaker ‘to traverse the Miscopy Valley, seeking to revive Neolin’s pan Indian alliance of the 1760s. Feeling that the only alternative to westward expansion was extermination, as one chief asked “Where are the Narragansett, the Mohican, the Pocanet, and other powerful tribes of our people? ‘They have vanished before the avarice {greed) and oppression of the white man, as snow before the sun.’ Indians, he proclaimed, must recognize that they were a single people and equal right in the land. He repudiated, “chiefs who had sold land to the federal government were no better than their white rivals.”…
- 446 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Talbot, Steve. "Spiritual Genocide: The Denial of American Indian Religious Freedom, from Conquest to 1934." Wicazo Sa Review 21.2 (2006): 10. JSTOR. Web. 29 Mar. 2013.…
- 1992 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Conflicts over land developed between Native Americans and the settlers. The Natives took up most of the land because they moved from place to place. They did not have a set territory. They were like “foxes and wild beasts…” Colonist said “so it is lawful now to take a land which none useth; and make use of it.” Europeans believed that land was essential for a society to progress. On the other hand, Native American viewed the land as a resource to be used and left unchanged. Because of this fight over land and misunderstanding of cultures, colonists justified wars against the Native Americans.…
- 420 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Custer made its way into the Black Hills as an investigation of rumors of gold in the area. The investigation proved that the area was rich in natural resources such as its suitability for grazing, cultivation, mineral, and timber resources. The investigations findings gained widespread circulation, and there was soon pressure from the public on the United States government to open up the Black Hills area for settlement. For a while, the government used military force to prevent settlers from entering the Black Hills area. However, this only lasted a short period of time. Eventually, the government decided that the military should no longer provide resistance to miners attempting to occupy the Black Hills. These orders were to be carried out without any notice to the Sioux Nation. As more settlers began to flood the area of the Black Hills, the U.S. government felt that the only course of action that was sensible was to attempt to purchase the land from the Sioux. When the negotiations failed, the U.S. resorted to military…
- 760 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
For thousands of years there have been conflicts over the ownership of land. The case between the Native Americans and the European settlers was no different. Europe was becoming overpopulated which prompted brave individuals to venture across the Atlantic Ocean to claim land in the New World. Their claim of land became an issue as the land was already occupied by the Natives. More settlers came and eventually colonies sprung up, which proceeded to push the Natives westwards from their land. Assaults on the colonists by Native Americans to defend their way of life resulted in many deaths. Some of the Natives assimilated to the ideas of the white man resulting in loss of their culture.…
- 288 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
This may be true, that money can’t buy pride, but land can’t either. According to the article “REPARATIONS FOR NATIVE AMERICANS: ANOTHER TRAIL OF TEARS”, “Money cannot buy or return dignity and self-respect.” The same idea is presented in “Why Native Americans don’t want reparations”, that “Justice, for us, would require the return of our land, not money.” However, the land that the Natives once lived on have structures and other people living on them. Therefore, if the US gave the Natives land, it would have to be different from the one they once lived on. Otherwise, the US would have to relocate the current residents and destroy the buildings. From there, the US would have to make up for another…
- 750 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Thesis: Modern Native American traditions reflect the history of struggle, strife and triumph they experienced in history.…
- 1021 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays