2). With so many problems escalating, the well should have been shut down; however, all the signs were shrugged off as nothing to worry about. As disagreements over negative test and pressure escalated, did they “realize the seriousness of the situation;” were they competent enough to understand all the data receiving from the well (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2013, p. 362)? In the case of the Deepwater Horizon Disaster, there were too many warning signs to ignore. “The reality is that BP and Transocean had grown dangerously overconfident and were pushing too close to the edge” (Meigs, 2016, para. 8). Such overconfidence leads to poor decision-making processes that promote incompetence and ignoring issues rather than facing them head
2). With so many problems escalating, the well should have been shut down; however, all the signs were shrugged off as nothing to worry about. As disagreements over negative test and pressure escalated, did they “realize the seriousness of the situation;” were they competent enough to understand all the data receiving from the well (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2013, p. 362)? In the case of the Deepwater Horizon Disaster, there were too many warning signs to ignore. “The reality is that BP and Transocean had grown dangerously overconfident and were pushing too close to the edge” (Meigs, 2016, para. 8). Such overconfidence leads to poor decision-making processes that promote incompetence and ignoring issues rather than facing them head