Preview

Defamation Is the Publication of a Statement

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2908 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Defamation Is the Publication of a Statement
Defamation also called calumny, vilification, slander and libel is the communication of a statement that makes a claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government, or nation a negative image.

Defamation is the publication of a statement which refers on a person’s reputation and tends to lower him in the estimation of right-thinking members of society generally or tends to make then shun or avoid him. [1]

The tort of defamation protects a person’s interest in his reputation. If the defendant had made an untrue statement, or what amounts to a statement, which is defamatory of the plaintiff, the plaintiff has a right of action against him unless the defendant can establish one of the special defenses available to an action for defamation. Since the tort of defamation protects the plaintiff’s reputation, and since reputation depends on what other people think of the plaintiff, the publication of the statement by the defendant to persons other than the plaintiff himself is an essential part of the tort –the purpose of the tort is not to protect the injured the feelings of the plaintiff. The tort goes beyond protecting their mere personal reputation of the plaintiff and extends to the protection of the reputation of his commercial and business undertakings.

The rules of the tort represent an attempt to strike a balance between two important and often competing interests, the public interest in freedom of speech and the private interest in marinating one’s reputation. The difficulty of achieving this balance is perhaps indicated by the fact that, though liability for a defamatory statement is strict and substantial damages might be recovered from the one making the defamatory statement, a large variety of defenses exist for the one who makes such a statement.

Regardless of whether a defamation action is framed in libel or slander, the claimant must always prove that the words, pictures,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    WIRETIME has committed an intentional business related tort known as Defamation. In this case all four elements of defamation are present. A defamatory statement was made, it was spread to a third party, the statement was very definite to one company, and it caused damages to BUGusa business.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bugusa Case Study

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Tort was committed by WIRETIME, Inc. which means “a civil wrong where on party has acted, or in some cases failed to act, and that action or inaction causes a loss to be suffered by another party” (Melvin, S.P., 2011) The statement made by WIRETIME, Inc. will potentially harm Bugusa, Inc. reputation. A statement made by WIRETIME, Inc. accusing Bugusa, Inc. products were low quality and did not work past a months’ time. This type of statement is a defamatory “A false and defamatory…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first rule applied in this case was the rule of libel and slander, which states that the cause of defamation must include four elements: “1) a false and defamatory statement concerning the plaintiff; 2) an unprivileged communication to a third party; 3) fault by the defendant amounting at least to negligence; and 4) special harm of the actionability of the statement irrespective of special harm.” (822) Libel is the defamation of one’s character in written form, and slander is the…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. What is the most “jealously” protected kind of speech, according to the court in this case? (3 points)…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bugusa, Inc., Worksheet

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Communicated to a third party. By advertising the disparaging statement, WIRETIME communicated to a third party, the public, thus satisfying the third condition of trade libel.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    b) If the person is a public official or figure a plantiff seeking damages for distress must prove actual malice. Actual malice includes knowledge that the printed statements are false or circumstances showing a reckless disregard for whether they are true or not. If the plaintiff is not a public figure there is liability without malice.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first chapter focuses on slander cases within the Dutch settlement of New Amsterdam, where defamation was often grounds for court…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bugusa Worksheet

    • 459 Words
    • 3 Pages

    was very particular to one organization, and it put a negative frame of mind to BUGusa’s…

    • 459 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Intentional tort disparagement is the publishing of a false statement of a material fact about a business’s product or service” (Kubasek, Browne, Herron, Giampetro-Meyer, Barkacs, Dhooge, & Williamson, 2012).…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Plaintiff, Sullivan (Plaintiff) sued the Defendant, the New York Times Co. (Defendant), for printing an advertisement about the civil rights movement in the south that defamed the Plaintiff. New York Times vs. Sullivan Defamation can be defined as a written or spoken statement that subjects someone to hatred or ridicule or injures a person’s occupation or business. This case was decided on March 9th, 1964 by unanimous decision. Justice Brennan delivered the opinion of the Court and concurrences were written by Justice Black and Justice Goldberg. The question before the court involved the first amendment freedom of speech and press and whether it protected defamatory false statements concerning public officials.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Esposito v. SFX

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “A statement is defamatory if it tends to expose the plaintiff to public hatred, contempt, ridicule or disgrace--that is, if it would tend to lead the average person in the community to form an evil or bad opinion of the plaintiff.” (Taken from LexisNexis, Esposito v SFX case)…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gm 520 Research Paper

    • 4631 Words
    • 19 Pages

    There are other types of intentional torts including: Defamation and slander that may pertain to publishing concerns or to information disseminated to the public about a business or an individual in an advertisement and, product disparagement is a serious tort involving the defamation of a company’s product. Innocent criticisms may be allowed, however when the disparagement causes loss of profits or ruins a company’s reputation, the harmed company can recover damages when the criticism has been committed with malice aforethought.…

    • 4631 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Media Study Guide

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. Explain the key elements of New York Times v. Sullivan (1964). What were the legal issues involved, and what was the U.S. Supreme Court’s rationale for its ruling? As a result, what does a public official have to establish in order to win a libel suit?…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil Liberties

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5. How are the standards for winning libel lawsuits different for public figures and private individuals?…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    what is crime

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    of a criminal case. If I slander somebody, I might be dragged into court, and I might have…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics