Preview

Defamation on the Internet

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5855 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Defamation on the Internet
INTRODUCTION

‘Cyber crimes’ is a term that has gained unprecedented popularity in the recent past, thanks to the extent to which cyber crimes have been committed. The advent of the internet has been accompanied by outcomes, good and bad. While the internet provides easy access to any information or person in any part of the world, it is the same advantage which has been misused for gaining undue advantage, in the form of various cyber crimes. One such crime among the plethora of cyber crimes, is the crime of defamation on the internet.

The freedom of expression is a fundamental human right that has been recognized at both the international and the national level. At the international level, the European Convention on Human Rights provides everyone with the right to freedom of expression. The same has been guaranteed by the Indian Constitution also. However, as with other rights, the freedom of expression can never be absolute.[1] More so ever, in current times, with the increasing cases of defamation on the internet. Internet communications may do serious injury to individual and corporate reputations. The ease with which messages can be sent and read on the internet means that the most allegations and defamatory statements can gain widespread currency and acceptance.[2] This calls for serious consideration of the matter and criminalization of the act.

Defamation is dealt with under S.499 of the Indian Penal Code. Owing to S.91 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, all offences under the Indian Penal Code are also applicable to acts of such nature on the internet, thus allowing conviction under S.499 of the Penal Code for cyber defamation. An essential requirement for conviction under defamation is that the defamatory material should be published. This has raised one of the major issues under defamation on the internet. Can e-mails containing defamatory statements be considered as publication? Another issue at hand with respect to defamation on the



Bibliography: Primary Sources : The Indian Penal Code, 1860 Information Technology Act, 2000 Secondary Sources : Barendt, Eric, Freedom of Speech, 2nd Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006. Ferrera et al., Cyber Law : Text and Cases, 2nd ed., Thomson, USA, 2004. Gupta, Apar, Commentary on Information Technology Act, Wadhwa & Co., Nagpur, 2007. Justice Chadrachud, Y. V, Ratanlal & Dhirajlal- The Indian Penal Code, 29th Ed., Wadhwa & Co., Nagpur, 2004. Kamath, Nandan, Law Relating to Computers, Internet & E-Commerce, 2nd Ed., Universal Law Publishing Ltd., London, 2000. Kevan, Tim & Paul McGrath, E-mail, the Internet and the Law, Encyclopaedia if IT law, Universal Law Publishing Co., New Delhi, 2007. Kohl, Uta, Jurisdiction and the Internet, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007. Lloyd, Ian, Information Technology Law, 5th Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008. Maggs, Peter et al., Internet and Computer Law, West Group American Casebook Series, Minnesota, 2001. Sarvaria, S.K, RA Nelson’s Indian Penal Code, Vol.4, LexisNexis, Butterworths, New Delhi, 2003. Smith, Graham, Internet Law and Regulation, 4th Ed., Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2007. Sood, Vivek, Cyber Law Simplified, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Co. Ltd., New Delhi, 2002. No Bad Puns: A Different Approach to the Problem of Personal Jurisdiction on the Internet, 116 HARV. L. REV. 1821, Harvard Law Review, April, 2003. ----------------------- [1] Lloyd, Ian, Information Technology Law, 5th Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008, 571. [2] Barendt, Eric, Freedom of Speech, 2nd Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006, 463. [3] Justice Chadrachud, Y. V, Ratanlal & Dhirajlal- The Indian Penal Code, 29th Ed., Wadhwa & Co., Nagpur, 2004, 2339. [4] Ferrera et al., Cyber Law : Text and Cases, 2nd ed., Thomson, USA, 2004, 345. [5] Smith, Graham, Internet Law and Regulation, 4th Ed., Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2007, 534. [6]Sarvaria, S.K, RA Nelson’s Indian Penal Code, Vol.4, LexisNexis, Butterworths, New Delhi, 2003, 4681. [9] NCERT v. P.D. Bhatnager, (1980) Raj. Cr. Cases, 392 as cited in Justice Chadrachud, Y. V, Ratanlal & Dhirajlal- The Indian Penal Code, 29th Ed., Wadhwa & Co., Nagpur, 2004, 2351. [10]Ferrera et al., Cyber Law : Text and Cases, 2nd ed., Thomson, USA, 2004, 356. [11]Kevan, Tim & Paul McGrath, E-mail, the Internet and the Law, Encyclopaedia if IT law, Universal Law Publishing Co., New Delhi, 2007, 67. [13] Kevan, Tim & Paul McGrath, E-mail, the Internet and the Law, Encyclopaedia if IT law, Universal Law Publishing Co., New Delhi, 2007, 69. [14] Ferrera et al., Cyber Law : Text and Cases, 2nd ed., Thomson, USA, 2004, 344. [15] Smith, Graham, Internet Law and Regulation, 4th Ed., Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2007, 318. [16] Smith, Graham, Internet Law and Regulation, 4th Ed., Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2007, 334. [17] [1994] 4 All ER 342 as cited in Lloyd, Ian, Information Technology Law, 5th Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008, 578. [18] Kevan, Tim & Paul McGrath, E-mail, the Internet and the Law, Encyclopaedia if IT law, Universal Law Publishing Co., New Delhi, 2007, 64. [19] Barendt, Eric, Freedom of Speech, 2nd Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006, 465. [20] 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 3746(1999) as cited Ferrera et al., Cyber Law : Text and Cases, 2nd ed., Thomson, USA, 2004, 348. [21] 776 F.Supp. 135 (S.D. N.Y. 1991) as cited in Ferrera et al., Cyber Law : Text and Cases, 2nd ed., Thomson, USA, 2004, 349. [22] 1995 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 229 (1995) as cited in Ferrera et al., Cyber Law : Text and Cases, 2nd ed., Thomson, USA, 2004, 349. [23] Chief Judge Wilkinson in Zeran v. America Online Inc. 129 F.2d 327 (4th Cir. 1997) as cited in Ferrera et al., Cyber Law : Text and Cases, 2nd ed., Thomson, USA, 2004, 351. [24] District Judge Freidman in Sidney Blumenthal v. Matt Drudge and America Online Inc. 992 F,Supp.44 (D.D.C. April 22, 1998) as cited in Ferrera et al., Cyber Law : Text and Cases, 2nd ed., Thomson, USA, 2004, 353. [25] 992 F,Supp.44 (D.D.C. April 22, 1998) as cited in Rowland, Diane and Elizabeth Macdonald, Information Technology Law, 3rd Ed., Cavendish Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 2002, 407. [26] Case No. CV 01-0018 DT (C.D. Cal. 2002) as cited in Ferrera et al., Cyber Law : Text and Cases, 2nd ed., Thomson, USA, 2004, 355. [27] Barendt, Eric, Freedom of Speech, 2nd Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006, 466. [28] Gupta, Apar, Commentary on Information Technology Act, Wadhwa & Co., Nagpur, 2007, 216. [29] Gupta, Apar, Commentary on Information Technology Act, Wadhwa & Co., Nagpur, 2007, 216-18. [32] No Bad Puns: A Different Approach to the Problem of Personal Jurisdiction on the Internet, 116 HARV. L. REV. 1821, 1824. [33] 1997 WL 835442 (C.D. Cal.) as cited in No Bad Puns: A Different Approach to the Problem of Personal Jurisdiction on the Internet, 116 HARV. L. REV. 1821, 1824. [35] 631 F. Supp. 1356 (C.D. Cal. 1986) as cited in Amar, Tanmay & Sarayu Natarajan, Regulation of Defamation over the Internet : Jurisdictional Issues. [37] Laid down in Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc., 465 US 770 (1984) as cited in Amar, Tanmay & Sarayu Natarajan, Regulation of Defamation over the Internet : Jurisdictional Issues. [38] 977 F. Supp. 404 (E.D. Va. 1997) as cited in Amar, Tanmay & Sarayu Natarajan, Regulation of Defamation over the Internet : Jurisdictional Issues. [39] Gutnick v. Dow Jones & Co. Inc., 2002 HCA 56 as cited in Rowland, Diane and Elizabeth Macdonald, Information Technology Law, 3rd Ed., Cavendish Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 2002, 398. [40] Amar, Tanmay & Sarayu Natarajan, Regulation of Defamation over the Internet : Jurisdictional Issues, as available on www.ebc-india.com/practicallawyer/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=469&Itemid=54 last visited on 29 December, 2008. [41] 952 F. Supp. 1119 (W.D. Pa. 1997) as cited in Amar, Tanmay & Sarayu Natarajan, Regulation of Defamation over the Internet : Jurisdictional Issues. [42] Braintech Inc. v. Kostiuk, (1999), 63 B.C.L. R 3d as cited in Amar, Tanmay & Sarayu Natarajan, Regulation of Defamation over the Internet : Jurisdictional Issues. [43]Kohl, Uta, Jurisdiction and the Internet, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007, 259.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In his article "Douse the Online Flamers" published in the LA Times in 2008, Andrew Keen discusses 3 major court cases in an effort to show just how backwards the legal system is when dealing with the anonymous people of the internet. People on the internet can ruin anyone's reputation or even their life without the fear of prosecution.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cmgt 400 Week 2

    • 1100 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Whitman, M. E. (2011). Readings and Cases in Information Security: Law and Ethics. New York, NY: Cengage Learning.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    References: Cheeseman, H. R. (2013). The Legal environment of business and online comerce, seventh edition. Upper Sadle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Whitman, M. E., & Mattord, H. J. (2011). Readings and cases in information security: Law and ethics. Boston, MA: Course Technology.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In particular, that 45% of the court circuits have adopted as broad interpretation of the law while only 36% have adopted a narrow interpretation of the law (Mikulic, 2016). The cautionary tale that the author spelled out in part I of the article was in particular an eye opener. The famous hacker and “internet troll” (Lennard, 2014) Weev (Andrew Auernheimer) was “sentenced to 41 months in federal prison for revealing to media outlets that AT&T had configured its servers to allow the harvesting of iPad owners' unsecured email addresses” (EFF, 2013). Both Weev and co-defendant Daniel Spitler used “a script that [exploited] the security hole to collect roughly 120,000 email addresses” (EFF, 2013). Weev was indicted under the provisions of the CFAA law, in particular the broad interpretation of the law. In which Weev had exploited a security hole that AT&T had failed to secure. I found that the author described a strong case where millions of Americans can be punished under the broad scope of…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: * Hart, J. D. (2007). Internet law: A field guide (p. 750). Washington, D.C.: BNA Books.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this article, Patrick Thibodeau comments on Federal CIO Vivek Kundra’s claim that cloud computing concerns are exaggerated. Thibodeau explains clearly the claims made by Kundra about the overall security with cloud computing. Thibodeau blames the scare of cloud computing to IT developers belief of a status quo. Thibodeau concludes the article with a few success stories of basic cloud computing services working in the U.S. Government.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gasser, Urs. "Recoding Privacy Law: Reflections On The Future Relationship Among Law, Technology, And Privacy." Harvard Law Review 130.2 (2016): 61-70. Academic Search Premier. Web. 5 Feb. 2017.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Forum 6

    • 1004 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ferrera, G. (2001). Chapter 10: The Employment Relationship in the Internet and Tech Sectors. In Cyberlaw: Text and cases (p. 320). Cincinnati, Ohio: West/Thomson Learning.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The review of “Copyright Law and the Internet” by John C. Montana will reveal different types of intellectual property, legal protection for intellectual property, and how the internet both complicates and simplifies intellectual property. There will also be some minor discussion of privacy, ethics, and security as they apply to intellectual property and the Internet. Much of the information found in the article is in line with the information found in the textbook.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Constitutional Law for Business and E-Commerce." Pearson Custom Business Resources. Boston: Pearson, 2012. 24, 28, 29, . Print.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Controversy Over Internet

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Controversy over Internet Police has raged on since the creation of the internet. Several have thought that not policing the internet has led to numerous crimes such as theft, illegal transactions, and cyber bullying. But a majority, in defence, claim that such policing could revoke us from our rights as citizens of the United States. Cases as such tend to lean more to the side of not policing the Internet. We believe that as well.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Copyright Laws

    • 2082 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Computer programs and cyber space usage has become a major part of our every day lives. Nearly everyone has to use a computer at some point, and for some it may be an all day every day affair. This being the case, every one should be aware of the laws and boundaries of cyber space usage, copyright infringement on shareware, freeware, and computer software programs. Most of the main legal issues that relate to cyberspace can be listed as: tort issues, contract issues, intellectual property issues, criminal law issues, and constitutional restraint and protections, and securities law issues.…

    • 2082 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On the successful accomplishment of this project, we would like to thank our Penal Law professor Prof. Sachiv Kumar who despite of all his pre-occupations provided us all the assistance and guidance we needed for the accomplishment of this project.…

    • 10889 Words
    • 44 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Online Defamation

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Defamation is a false and unprivileged statement of fact that is harmful to someone's reputation, and published "with fault," meaning as a result of negligence or malice. State laws often define defamation in specific ways.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays