Although Michaela is a well-meaning, kind servant girl, the soldiers on rest leave in Rome demean and insult her for no other reason than because they can. Through Michaela’s treatment, Heller argues that war brings out the worst in people and this is unacceptable. This is shown through the progression of Michaela’s abuse through the story. In the beginning of the war, the soldiers merely tease her. However, this escalates, as near the end of the war (and the novel), Aarfy brutally kidnaps, rapes, and murders her by throwing her out of a window. Aarfy does not feel remorse for his actions; More than that, he fails to even comprehend Yossarian’s furious reaction. In essence, Aarfy becomes an animal, a wild beast, unable to control his primal lust. The war has normalized violence and cruelty to Aarfy, which Heller shows through Aarfy’s transformation from a rude, but harmless fraternity boy to a cold-blooded murderer. Heller uses Michaela’s violent death to claim that people become beasts and a blight on humanity when constantly surrounded by the violence and bloodshed of…
Soldiers from all the different periods of time have faced the hardships of war. In history, there have been millions of troops. One of the soldiers to compare is Odysseus from Homer’s “The Odyssey. The other are soldiers from the second world war. In Homer’s The Odyssey, Odysseus experiences are similar to those of modern soldiers returning from war, such as the deaths of their fellow soldiers, the amount of time for which they left, and the ill treatment they faced when returning home. All soldiers experienced hardships. These experiences were proved to be obstacles for both soldiers, even though they came from different time periods.…
The novel is a reflection of the nationalism of german soldiers because of the horrors it brings. Nationalism brought millions of men to war. In the epigraph Paul says that a whole generation of men were destroyed by war, even those who survived it. Paul describes himself as dead, the war has only made him "an agony of himself" (185). The soldiers face the mud, rats, shelling, bullets, and starvation along with other horrors, all for their country. The novel is clearly a reflection of the nationalism of german soldiers because it has brought death and worse upon its population.…
Soldiers who barely knew each other were thrust into extremely dangerous situations. At the onset of the novel Paul has a naive judgement about war however, that quickly changes as Paul witnesses bloodshed. Paul and his friend go to visit their comrade, Kemmerich, whose leg got amputated. All the soldiers including Paul were aware that there friend was on the brink of death. Instead of being concerned, Paul and the others worry about who will get Kemmerich’s boots, “But as it is the boots are quite inappropriate to Kemmerich’s circumstances, whereas Muller can make good use of them” (Remarque 21). Furthermore, the death of a fellow soldier doesn’t affect Paul and the others since they show no sympathy instead they are egoistic and obsessed with who will get the boots. Paul’s tone demonstrates that he no longer cares for his buddies but rather focuses on his own selfish desires. Paul’s emotions have vanished and he believes that the boots are “inappropriate to Kemmerich’s circumstances”. Paul insists that “Muller can make good use of them” since the boots will be of no use to Kemmerich once he is dead. Paul can no longer feel the emotions that every individual feels such as sympathy, portraying that he is completely been dehumanized. The boots symbolize the cheapness of human life in war. A good pair of boots according to the soldiers is more valuable and more durable than a human life. The boots also show the attitude and emotions of soldiers as they are no longer sensitive or feel sad. Paul’s emotionless state shows how it affected his mentality “When a man has seen so many dead he cannot understand any longer why there should be so much anguish over a single individual” (Remarque 181). Upon seeing so many deaths Paul no longer…
Many men were destroyed by the war mentally. The Soldiers that survived the war and came home almost all had PTSD and were mentally ill from what they had seen or experienced. (Chapter 5, pg.87) "The war has ruined us for everything” This quote means that what they have seen and done in the war has transformed them into only being able to think of and understand the life of war. War becomes what they live and breath and cannot comprehend with other jobs that do not relate to war and the horrifying killing that they were trained to do. Paul was destroyed by the war when he was in a shelling whole and an enemy jumped into it with him and Paul stabbed…
War is a very controversial topic for many people. Depending on the person’s outlook on the war, it can be depicted as something good or bad. War brings destruction wherever it goes, whether it is on a place or the people, and it ultimately is inevitable. War also protects a country from having further destruction and keeps the people at home safe from any danger. As a person can see in many recordings of war, there are many comparisons and contrasts that are expressed through soldiers, veterans, and civilians. Some comparisons seen in many of the testimonies given by effected people are dehumanization, dislocation, and alienation; but they also have contrasts that can be seen through nationalism, technological advancements, and the coming home for many…
War is portrayed as just an armed state of conflict habitually, but that does not begin to cover the depths of it.War tears at an individual, whether you are a soldier fighting for your nation or daughter waiting for her father to return home unscathed. Additionally, it comes with the heavy price. Through the words of Jose Narosky, "In war, there are no unwounded soldiers." Every man or woman receives some type of damage. People are broken down by their surroundings and left emotionally and mentally paralyzed. Piece by piece a person is plagued by war's appalling actions. It is a very cruel reality but an accurate one.No matter what war is transpiring, this same outcome is precise.The World War 1 based novel, All Quiet on the Western Front, by Erich Maria Marque examines the…
Owen attempts to convey to the reader the experiences of the everyday man to demonstrate how unglamorous and futile war in fact was. In Strange Meetings, Owen displays a meeting with an individual who belonged to the opposing side, in which he stated to him ‘I am the enemy you killed my friend’. Although the man belonged to the opposing side, Owen still demonstrates compassion towards him by calling him a ‘friend’, friends who are forced to employ horrific and futile deaths upon one another. Similarly, in Apologia Owen exemplifies the fact soldiers were forced to ‘not feel sickness or remorse for murder’, which resulted in the exact opposite. Many soldiers, which Owen attempts to portray, showed tenderness and compassion to the opposing soldiers despite the negativity depicted against one another. The reader is forced to elicit negative emotions towards the instigators of war, which forced these men to participate in such events. Not only does Owen portray tenderness and compassion to the soldiers, he attempts to elicit negative emotions from to reader to disregard war.…
The people at home have a conception of the war that differs from the experience at the front.” The duty slots on the front are where the most serious changes occur between solder and a human being. They march up with self respect of being a man, but end up becoming animals. Individuals are no longer recognized, people are categorized in groups, a column of men ready to go into battle. The human instinct is no longer there, but instead the need to survive is the only thing that one can see. Upon arrival back home for leave, there is a sense of awkwardness. Though one is “home” the sense of feeling like constant distance and not feeling himself was an agonizing pain. The amount of trauma from losing friends and the constant struggle of being at war had made Paul feel like the feeling and meaning of home was something of the distant…
Similarly to Hardy and Owen, Shakespeare makes war seem a corrupting force both physically and mentally. War turned the Macbeth who was praised by the King, into a Macbeth who was killing people regardless of who they were and also a Macbeth who was disgraced and humiliated in the latter end of his life and after he died. Owen also faced this corrupting force through war, because he says, ‘In all my dreams, before my helpless sight, He plunges at me, guttering, choking, drowning.’ This shows how terrible nightmares and flashbacks are caused by participation in war. A much more unsophisticated version of this corruption can be seen in The Man He Killed because the ‘soldier’ killed a person who had never wronged him in any way and had he had met him outside of war, he would have ‘treat, if met where any bar is, Or help to half a crown.’…
Through out the appalling novel, All Quiet on the Western Front written by Erich Remarque, many themes were prevalent in the reading. The one theme that stood out most to me was the horrors and dehumanizing effects of war. Remarque, who fought in World War I himself, gives great details on how the solders live and the gruesome encounters.…
Dehumanization is one of the central processes in the transformation of ordinary, normal people into indifferent or even wanton perpetrators of evil, Phillip Zimbardo brilliantly explains in his novel The Lucifer Effect (Zimbardo 157). Dehumanization plays a key role in the military, whether it be utilized concerning the enemy or regarding America’s own troops. In A Few Good Men, Downey and Dawson did not have the privilege of being able to refer to Santiago as a person, they simply were ordered to perform a “code red” on a dissatisfactory marine. Zimbardo accounts for Dawson and Downey’s acts by elucidating that dehumanization resembles a “cortical cataract” that clouds one's thinking and fosters the perception that other individuals are less…
By this it is meant that no one who fights in a war isn’t changed in someway. Be it physically or mentally no one can escape some form of changing. Entire concepts and thoughts change too, even for those not affected, including the idea of war itself. One such example of how peoples perspective changed is shown in The World of Yesterday, In the the author describes the young recruits as thinking war is glorious and its almost a romantic thing to go off and die for your country, claiming “They still saw it in the perspective of their school readers in of the paintings in museums; brilliant cavalry attacks in glittering uniforms, the fatal shot always straight through the heart, the entire campaign a resounding march of victory” (Document H). And claims they were excited to go off fight in the war claiming this to be thought as the “most wonderful and exciting experience of their lives.” (Document H). However as history tells us, they were soon to be proven horribly wrong. The initial thought of how war was, this glorious romantic thing, turns out to have changed, its now brutal and deadly, with very few blessed with a quick and simple death. The change is brilliantly displayed in “Dulce Et Decorum Est” By Wilfred Owen. In this document the brutality of the great war is shown off. Explaining the horrors and issues soldiers has to deal with constantly such as how “Many had lost their boots but limped on, blood-shod. All went lame; all blind; drunk with fatigue; deaf…” Which doesn’t sound as glorious as described in the world of yesterday. The direct change is also exampled in Dulce where it is said that if you saw the horrors of the war “you would not tell with such high zest/to children ardent for some desperate glory, the old lie: Dulce et decorum est/pro patria mori.” (Document C). Meaning to get the message across that it is not actually “sweet and proper to die…
In the Iliad, the author, Homer, displays how war can affect individuals physically and mentally. This results in the individuals becoming more barbaric and hindering their true identities. Throughout the Iliad, the author shows the effects of war on specific characters.…
Henry and his conscious are undoubtedly unprepared for the future to come. He does not have the experience to know what lies ahead and in confusion begins to lose his fundamental ideas and really questions his ethics. The loss of ethics shows the dehumanizing effects already taking place before he has even experienced war.…