Preview

Descartes Arguments For The Existence Of God

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
944 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Descartes Arguments For The Existence Of God
There have been many arguments and philosophical beliefs of the existence of god. For many centuries, there have been many attempts by many philosophers to prove the existence of God. Many philosophers’ arguments for the existence of God come in many different evidence like using science, personal experience, history and philosophy. Looking at the philosopher's point of view, I have come across two arguments that explain the existence of god which is the cosmological and ontological argument. As of today, even with all the development of sciences, we still do not have a clear answer if god exists or not but from my personal belief, he exists. He exists because how the idea of god could be created in our minds and that the event of something …show more content…
He starts with the idea of a God who is eternal, infinite, and perfect. In the beginning of Meditations on First Philosophy, He explains that “we must believe that there is a God, because we are so taught in the Holy Scriptures, and, on the other hand, that we must believe the Holy Scriptures because they come from God “(Descartes 1). He then doubts himself if god does really exist. Through examining his thoughts, he ends up believing that the idea of God exists because of his innate idea of God which has to be God who “is the cause of this idea”(Descartes 25). Descartes then explains more in depth saying, “I have no choice but to conclude that the mere fact of my existing is and of there being in me an idea of a most perfect being, that is God, demonstrates most evidently that God too exists” (34). Another reason is how in his further mediations, he explains how if God does not exist, then he is not a supremely perfect being. Saying that God does not exist, we can imagine a being that is more perfect than God. But this is a contradiction because since the idea of God is the idea of the most perfect being of all. Therefore, God must exist because you cannot image a more perfect being than god, who he is the almighty and perfect of …show more content…
The problem of evil is that if God exists then he should know to prevent all evil doings. If this God existed then we would want him to prevent all of the evil doing in the world. War, rape, and murder are examples that have not been prevented and still are ongoing today. The argument claims then that there is no such God. I think the problem of evil exists because it exists for a certain kind of good meaning every bad thing will eventually lead to something good. There are certain things that need the opposite of one self in order to be true. For example, in order to become brave, you need to show that you are brave. You must be fearless of doing dangerous things in order to be brave. God created us to depend on each other so that we can become a loving

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The ontological argument rests on the premise that the universe’s existence is contingent- it depends on something else to exist. The argument is deductive, analytic and a priori, and was first formed by St. Anselm, who prayed for a short argument that would prove God to be “that than which nothing greater can be conceived”. This prayer was called the proslogion and tried to prove God by means of reductio ad absurdum, which states that the existence of God is logically necessary. The argument is based on the word “God”, a being that possesses all perfections, therefore must exist. Anselm was aware that the existence of God is denied by atheists and in response to this, he states “the fool has said in his heart there is no God”.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The problem with the logical problem of evil is plain and simple to what you’re reading. The word logical is the key. We as people like to think that suffering and evil will lead to build morality and character. But where is the proof? A theist could also say that you can prevent suffering and evil by your own freedom and choices. But clearly that isn’t the case and anything could happen at any given moment. A counter-example is if a man was walking on the sidewalk and gets hit by a car from behind, and suffers and dies slowly. How can you prove that this incident was for the greater good? If there was an omniscient being how could he not prevent this or let him die instantly instead of suffering? That is the evidential problem of evil’s argument.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes believes the starting point of anything is in the thinkers mind. In his third meditation he uses the thinker’s first starting point of idea to suggest the existence of God. If they have the idea of God, then the features and attributes we have of him, he must have and therefore exist. His line of thought is evidently anti- empiricism, proven further by his statement:…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The problem of evil refers to the question of how to reconcile the existence of evil with an omnibenevolent, omniscient, and omnipotent God.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to this principle, the reality of the cause must be greater than or equal to the reality of the effect. The idea of God has infinite reality and, by theory, the only cause of this infinite idea can only be God. With all this said, the reality of God is the only plausible cause to the reality of the idea of God. Descartes gives another proof in Meditation Five where he has reasoned that a triangle must have all the properties he assigns to it, because the triangle exists as an idea in his mind and he clearly and distinctly perceives all these properties. He then reasons, by analogy, that God exists as an idea in his mind and he clearly and distinctly perceives all of his qualities. One of these qualities is existence, so it follows from his clear and distinct perception that God must exist. If existence is the essence of God, then God would not be God if he did not exist, just as a triangle would not be a triangle if it were not three-sided. At the very least, then, the existence of God must be as certain as the properties of mathematical and geometrical objects since he can prove them in the same way. Having concluded that God must necessarily exist, Descartes goes further and then asks how he received the idea of God. He could have not invented the idea. Therefore, the idea must be innate which, according to Descartes, means that God must have created him…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most common and influential argument’s for the existence of God are design arguments. In the last fifty years design arguments have received the most attention philosophically. Design arguments are both empirical and inductive arguments. Design arguments identify properties of objects in nature and argue that the only way that they could have occurred or the best explanation for them is that there is some intelligent/higher being that created or conceived the object. William Paley was a Christian apologist in the eighteenth century who was known for his popular version of the teleological argument (“watchmaker analogy”). Paley stressed the idea that the world’s complexity and design is not based off luck or chance, but rather designed by…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The existence of God is one of the greatly talked about philosophical topics throughout history. There have been many arguments proposed in order to answer the question. One argument is the ontological argument. The first person to propose the ontological argument is St. Anselm in the eleventh century. St. Anselm tries to prove the existence God from the idea of a being that which no greater being can be imagined. St. Anselm contemplated that, if such a being did not exist, then a more superior being can be thought of to…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are 3 main arguments that each seek to prove the existence of God; the Ontological, Cosmological, and Teleological Arguments. Each is different in its approach, but all arrive at the same conclusion. Ontological Argument argues God’s existence from the assumption of the existence a “Greatest Thing that can ever be conceived.” From there, it argues that in order for something to be “The Greatest Thing ever” it must exist physically (that is outside of the mind). The Cosmological Argument argues that since everything in the universe is contingent (or is dependent on other things for its existence), there must be a first cause that set the universe in motion.…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To present the topic of “the problem with evil,” without acknowledging there is a God can be confusing. I think one of the best questions that you could ask is, why does God allow evil being a perfect and loving God (Elwell, pg 413…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In conclusion, despite each argument having its strengths and weaknesses, the ontological argument shines because it underscores perfect theology and reason, making it a compelling contender for the most persuasive argument for the existence of God. It's crucial to continue discussing and examining these arguments in order to fully grasp their complexities and importance. Descartes' argument merges cosmology and ontology in order to demonstrate the existence of a supremely perfect being. He argues that the concept of a perfect being is innate to us and cannot originate from anything else. This argument highlights the idea of perfection within us and posits that it must have originated from a perfect being, which is God.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Firstly, Descartes in the third meditation sets out to prove that God does indeed exist. To begin with, he considered that the source of an idea must be as real as the idea itself. He thought that since his idea of God had overwhelmingly unlimited content, then the one who caused the idea must be infinite and that it must be god, and thus asserted that what is more perfect cannot arise from what is imperfect. In his conclusion, Descartes says that God is a substance that is omnipotent, omniscient, independent and infinite. He argued that if the objective reality of an idea could not come from him, then it could have come from something else. The basis for the arguments he put forward lies in the…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate the arguments for the existence of god There are three main philosophical arguments for the existence of god; the Teleological argument (also known as the design argument), made by William Paley, which presents the central idea that the universe is so complex, perfectly designed and purposeful that it must have had an intelligent designer, the Cosmological argument, made by Thomas Aquinas, which is based on the main idea that everything has a starting point so an uncaused god must have made/caused the universe, and the (entirely a priori) Ontological argument, made by Anselm, based on the main idea that god is perfect, and that existence is a predicate of perfection so therefore God must be real both in our minds and reality as he…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cosmological Argument

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Out of the four arguments for the existence of a God, the Cosmological argument is the most persuasive. For thousands of years, humans have wondered what their purpose on Earth is and how we came to exist. Because of this wondering, many humans have concluded that there is an all-powerful creator who created the universe and everything in it. But, since we cannot see this creator and have no evidence as proof of his existence, there are many people who doubt the existence of an all-powerful creator. There are four main arguments for the existence of God. They are the Teleological argument, the Cosmological arguments, the Ontological arguments, and the Moral arguments. None of them provide objective proof…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Outline The Problem Of Evil

    • 2599 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The problem of evil is usually seen as the problem of how the existence of God can be reconciled with the existence of evil in the world. It's regarded as a logical problem, because it is based on the apparent contradiction involved in holding onto three incompatible beliefs. This being that God is omnipotent, that God is wholly good and that evil exists in the world. The fact that evil exists in the world constitutes the most common objection to the belief in the existence of the omnipotent (all powerful),…

    • 2599 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When Descartes philosophy deals with reality and what is deception, God enters the picture. God, being an all powerful being is considered when the idea of something perfect is thought of. Since every idea must have some relevance to reality, the thought of perfection must have come from somewhere (Ex nihilo nihil fit; nothing comes from nothing). The idea of perfection must have been placed in our minds by a perfect being. Therefore God exists. The proof of God 's existence is explained in different terms because the translation cannot always be correct. The main components of the proof are always present.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays