Preview

Examine the Key Concepts of the Ontological Argument for the Existence of God

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
455 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examine the Key Concepts of the Ontological Argument for the Existence of God
1b) Examine the key concepts of the ontological argument for the existence of God (18)

The ontological argument rests on the premise that the universe’s existence is contingent- it depends on something else to exist. The argument is deductive, analytic and a priori, and was first formed by St. Anselm, who prayed for a short argument that would prove God to be “that than which nothing greater can be conceived”. This prayer was called the proslogion and tried to prove God by means of reductio ad absurdum, which states that the existence of God is logically necessary. The argument is based on the word “God”, a being that possesses all perfections, therefore must exist. Anselm was aware that the existence of God is denied by atheists and in response to this, he states “the fool has said in his heart there is no God”.

Descartes later reformulated the ontological argument, who sought to prove the existence of God through reason alone. He stated that he exists, and in his mind he has the concept of a perfect being, and as an imperfect being, he could not have conjured up the idea of a perfect being, therefore this idea must have originated from the perfect being itself, and this perfect being must exist in order to be perfect, consequently a perfect being exists. He also stated that the idea of God is the idea of a perfect being, and a supremely perfect being has all perfections, existence is perfection, a supremely perfect being must have existence, therefore it is impossible to think of God as not existing, hence God exists.

Gaunilo stated that if the ontological argument was applied to things other than God, then it led to invalid conclusions. He applied Anselm’s premise to the idea of a perfect island: I can conceive of an island that no greater island can be thought of; such an island must possess all perfections; existence is a perfection; the island exists. He also stated that the views of the “greatest island” would be subjective. Kant stated that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Anselm, Archbishop of Canterbury and a monk was the creator of the Ontological Argument. The main aspect behind the argument was that the existence of God was true, in simple words, God exists. The argument is deductive as it depends only on knowledge and logic, not on experience as experiencing God is impossible physically. It is also a priori for similar reasons; the argument relies on logic alone.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Examine the ways in which the design argument provides evidence for the existence of God…

    • 984 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    St. Anselm, Archbishop of Cantebury (1033-1109), is the originator of the ontological argument, which he describes in the Proslogium as follows: [Even a] fool, when he hears of … a being than which nothing greater can be conceived … understands what he hears, and what he understands is in his understanding.… And assuredly that, than which nothing greater can be conceived, St. Anselm, Archbishop of Cantebury (1033-1109), is the originator of the ontological argument, which he describes in the Proslogium as follows: [Even a] fool, when he hears of … a being than which nothing greater can be conceived … understands what he hears, and what he understands is in his understanding.… And assuredly that, than which nothing greater can be conceived,St. Anselm, Archbishop of Cantebury (1033-1109), is the originator of the ontological argument, which he describes in the…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anselm is not trying to say that whatever one can think of exist because, everyone can think of something that does not exist. Neither is he trying to saying believing in something without any doubt makes it exist. Finally Anselm might believe in God, he is not trying to convince us that God exist but rather he is trying to show us that once one understands or grasp the concept of who or what God, then based on logic it follows that God has to exist. Anselm ontological argument follows that if one makes an assumption and can show things that follow from that assumption lead to contradiction, then the initial assumption is rejected and conclude the opposite…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descarte would also agree with the statement, as in his ontological argument he sets out that God is a perfect being, a part of being perfect is existing, and therefore God must exist. Descarte also uses the idea of the triangle in his argument, he writes that even if we think of triangles having four sides, the truth will not change; the triangle will remain to have 3 sides. For Descarte the triangle is God, he believes that God is immutable and will not change even if humans think he does not exist. Descarte would argue…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ontological arguments are a priori, they begin with some prior claim about the concept of God, and deduce conclusions or proof from this conception. In line two, he asserts that if God, or x is the most perfect object thought, it then follows also that x exists either in the understanding or reality. Line 3 follows from this assertion. In line 4 Anselm asserts that if x exists in the understanding only, then something else greater can be thought and that being greater, it then must exist in reality. In line 5 he restates his assertion in line one, and concludes that x then exists in reality.…

    • 2513 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anselm’s argument did lead to objections as most do. The first was that of a Monk Named Gaunilo, who argued against Anselm’s ontological Argument with the use of the concept of a perfect island. Gaunilo argued that concept of a perfect island does not prove that the existence of an island. In this case that perfection does not imply ‘existence’. Gaunilo claims that if the word God was replaced with the words perfect island, then Anselm’s ontological argument would not conclude that the perfect island exists. The fact Gaunilo was trying to bring across that a valid argument can never have true premises and a false conclusion, as the conclusion has to follow logically from the premises. Constructing a similar argument in which the conclusion is false shows that Anselm’s argument is flawed. Gaulino’s argument follows the basic form as such:…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Outline the Ontological argument for the existence of God and consider the view that, while it may strengthen a believer’s faith, it has no value for the non ....…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Examine some of the key principles of the argument for the existence of God based upon religious experiences…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ontological argument proposed by Anselm, in Anselm’s Proslogion is a priori argument, meaning it does not start from a feature of the world but rather a definition of God. It seeks to move from a definition of god to the reality of god by reasoning.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The existence of God is one of the greatly talked about philosophical topics throughout history. There have been many arguments proposed in order to answer the question. One argument is the ontological argument. The first person to propose the ontological argument is St. Anselm in the eleventh century. St. Anselm tries to prove the existence God from the idea of a being that which no greater being can be imagined. St. Anselm contemplated that, if such a being did not exist, then a more superior being can be thought of to…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, the argument clearly has its weaknesses and primarily this is that the argument is successful in proving that if God exists then he must exist, although for the atheist, this may not be enough. Interstingly, even among the faithful there are theories that suggest the idea to know of God’s essence at all is impossible, as the great theologian Aquinas remarked: “we do not know the essence of God”11 Clearly, there can be little doubt that the Ontological Argument has stimulated huge amounts of debate and even in the last century thinkers, philosophers and theologians such as Hick and Malcolm have attempted to rework the argument in a manner of different ways. However, despite this constant reworking, perhaps the argument’s real value is only in the devotional, for those who already believe, and not for the atheist. After all, to truly show that God must exist with this argument, one must accept that God exist to begin with which perhaps explains why Anselm originally set it out not as a formal proof, but as a…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    During the 11th Century Saint Anslem came up with an apriori argument which deals with the existence of God. This argument was refuted by Aquinas in the 13th Century, while in the 17th century it was revised by Descartes only to then be refuted once more by Immanuel Kant. It was Kant himself who finally gave a name to this argument to which today we know it as the Ontological Argument. With works such as ‘Fides Quaerense Intellectum’ and ‘Proslogian’ Anslem tried to prove and show that certain Christian beliefs are actually true. He got his inspiration from Psalm 14 which shows how the Fool ‘hath said in his heart ‘There is no God.’…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ontological Argument

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Through the ontological argument, Anselm seeks to prove that God exists and he attempts to refute the fool who says in his heart that there is no God. This fool has two important characteristics: he understands the claim that God exists and he does not believe that God exists. Gaunilo plays the role of the “fool” and challenges Anselm’s ontological argument. I will argue that Anselm’s response to Gaunilo’s attack is not adequate because it does not address the issue of certainty, which plays an important role in Gaunilo’s objection. First, I will explain, in greater depth, Anselm’s ontological argument. I will then elaborate on why Gaunilo denies that than which nothing greater can be conceived exists in the understanding. Lastly, I will argue why Anselm’s response to Gaunilo’s attack is insufficient.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He starts by refuting Descartes triangle example, and objects Descartes attempt to transfer the logic to the existence of God. He argues that a triangle has three sides only if it first exists, a nonexistent triangle has no existing sides. Saying that a triangle has three sides does not mean that a triangle actually exists. He then continues on to declare that the claim “God exists” is either analytic or synthetic, if it is analytic then the predicate is contained with the subject, if its synthetic the predicate is not contained with the subject, the ontological argument assumes the predicate to be within the subject making it an analytic claim, this would mean that the statement is only true because of the meaning given to the words. If we were to make the argument synthetic then we would find that it doesn’t work either, the existence of God would not be contained within the definition of God and as a result we would need to find other evidence. He follow this argument with another, this argument is that existence is not a real predicate and cannot be a part of a concept, he argues that existence does not add to the essence of a being, rather it only indicates whether something occurs in reality. His argument is that if existence isn’t a predicate then the ontological argument is invalid because it would be possible to be a perfect being that doesn’t…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays